Influência do tempo de armazenamento sobre o selamento de restaurações de amálgama utilizando diferentes forradores
Influence of storage time on sealing of amalgam restorations using different liners
Moraes, R.R.; Lima, F.G.; Bueno, M.; Demarco, F.F.
Rev. odontol. UNESP, vol.34, n3, p.135-140, 2005
Resumo
O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar, pela análise da microinfiltração, a influência do tempo de armazenamento sobre o selamento de restaurações de amálgama com diferentes materiais forradores. Cavidades Classe V padronizadas, com margens em dentina/cemento, foram confeccionadas nas raízes de 80 incisivos bovinos. Todos os materiais foram aplicados seguindo as recomendações dos fabricantes, formando 4 grupos (n = 20): G1 – controle (sem forrador); G2 – verniz Copalite (Cooley & Cooley) com secagem por 5 segundos; G3 – verniz Copalite com secagem por 30 segundos; e G4 – sistema adesivo Single Bond (3M ESPE). As cavidades foram restauradas com a liga Dispersalloy (Dentsply Caulk) e, após 24 horas, realizou-se o acabamento e o polimento, sendo as amostras armazenadas em soro fisiológico, a 37°C. Após 7 dias, 10 espécimes de cada grupo foram aleatoriamente selecionados, submetidos a termociclagem e imersos em solução de fucsina básica a 0,5%. Os espécimes foram então longitudinalmente seccionados, e a penetração do corante avaliada sob magnificância (40x), com escores padronizados (0-2). Procedimentos semelhantes foram realizados com os espécimes restantes após 15 meses de armazenagem. Os dados foram submetidos ao teste estatístico de Kruskal-Wallis (α = 0,01). Na primeira avaliação, as restaurações forradas com o adesivo Single Bond (G4) apresentaram escores de infiltração significativamente menores em relação aos dos demais grupos (p < 0,001). Após 15 meses de armazenamento, nenhum dos grupos testados apresentou melhoria na capacidade de vedamento, enquanto o G4 demonstrou aumento significativo dos escores de penetração do corante (p < 0,001)
Palavras-chave
Amálgama de prata, infiltração dentária, verniz cavitário, adesivos dentinários.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate, by microleakage means, the storage time effect on sealing of amalgam restorations lined with different materials. Standard Class V cavities, with margins placed in dentin/cementum, were made in 80 bovine incisors roots. All materials were applied following manufactures’ instructions, defining 4 groups (n = 20): G1 – control (unlined restorations); G2 – 5 s air-dried Copalite liner (Cooley & Cooley Ltd.); G3 – 30 s air-dried Copalite liner; and G4 – Single Bond adhesive system (3M ESPE). Cavities were filled (Dispersalloy, Dentsply Caulk) and finishing and polishing performed after 24 hours. Specimens were stored in sodium azide solution at 37°C. After 7 days, 10 samples per group were randomly selected, thermal cycled and immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin solution. Specimens were then cross sectioned and dye penetration evaluated under magnification (40x), with standard scores (0-2). Similar procedures were performed with the remaining samples, after 15 months of storage. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 0.01). In the first evaluation, restorations lined with Single Bond (G4) presented significantly lower leakage scores between all groups (p < 0.001). After the 15-month storage period, none of the tested groups presented significant improvement in the sealing ability, while G4 showed a significant increase in the dye leakage scores (p < 0.001).
Keywords
Dental amalgam, dental leakage, dental cavity lining, dentin-bonding agents
References
1. Wilson NH. Curricular issues changing from amalgam to tooth-coloured materials. J Dent. 2004; 32: 367-9.
2. Burke FJ. Amalgam to tooth-coloured materials – implications for clinical practice and dental education: governmental restrictions and amalgam-usage survey results. J Dent. 2004; 32: 343-50.
3. Oliveira FS, Silva SM, Bijella MF, Lima JE. In vitro evaluation of the marginal microleakage of class II amalgam restoration associated with dentin adhesive. Rev Odontol Univ São Paulo. 1999; 13: 263-8.
4. Busato AL, Barbosa AN, Bueno M, Baldissera RA. Restaurações de dentes posteriores. São Paulo: Artes Médicas; 1997.
5. Berry TG, Parker SD, Rice D, Muñoz CA. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using dentin bonding system primers. Am J Dent. 1996; 9: 174-8.
6. Raskin A, D’Hoore W, Gonthier S, Degrange M, Dejou J. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. J Adhes Dent. 2001; 3: 295-308.
7. Sepetcioglu F, Ataman BA. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of cavity varnish and adhesive resin with amalgam. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 79: 136-9.
8. Kelsey WP, Panneton MJ. A comparison of amalgam microleakage between a copal varnish and two resincompatible cavity varnishes. Quintessence Int. 1988; 19: 895-8.
9. Ziskind D, Venezia E, Kreisman I, Mass E. Amalgam type, adhesive system, and storage period as influencing factors on microleakage of amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90: 255-60.
10. Cenci MS, Piva E, Potrich F, Formolo E, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials. Braz Dent J. 2004; 15: 13-8.
11. Pilo R, Brosh T, Shapinko E, Dodiuk H. Long-term durability of adhesive systems bonded to fresh amalgam. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 76: 431-6.
12. Ben-Amar A, Liberman R, Rothkoff Z, Cardash HS. Long term sealing properties of Amalgambond under amalgam restorations. Am J Dent. 1994; 7: 141-3.
13. Crim GA. Effect of aging on microleakage of restorative systems. Am J Dent. 1993; 6: 192-4.
14. Liberman R, Ben-Amar A, Nordenberg D, Jodaikin A. Long-term sealing properties of amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Dent Mater. 1989; 5: 168-70.
15. Formolo E, Sartori A, Demarco FF. Infiltração marginal em cavidades de Classe V com o uso de diferentes materiais adesivos. RPG Rev Pós Grad. 2001; 8: 306-12.
16. Ben-Amar A, Cardash HS, Liberman R. Varnish application technique and microleakage of amalgam restorations. Am J Dent. 1993; 6: 65-8.
17. Acciari HA, Codaro EN, Guastaldi AC. Uma revisão sobre a corrosão em amálgamas dentários. Pós-Grad Rev Fac Odontol São José dos Campos. 1998; 1: 13-20.
18. Anusavice KJ. Phillip’s science of dental materials. 10th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998.
19. Von Fraunhofer JA, Staheli PJ. Corrosion of amalgam restorations. A new explanation. Br Dent J. 1971; 130: 522-4.
20. Derand T. Test of long-term corrosion of dental amalgams. Scand J Dent Res. 1986; 94: 253-8.
21. Kreulen CM, Tobi H, Gruythuysen RJ, van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer PJ. Replacement risk of amalgam treatment modalities: 15-year results. J Dent. 1998; 26: 627-32.
22. Gottlieb EW, Retief DH, Bradley EL. Microleakage of conventional and high-cooper amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53: 355-61.
23. Wendt SL Jr, McInnes PM, Dickinson GL. The effect of thermocycling in microleakage analysis. Dent Mater. 1992; 8: 181-4.
24. Fitchie JG, Reeves GW, Scarbrough AR, Hembree JH. Microleakage of a new cavity varnish with a high-copper spherical amalgam alloy. Oper Dent. 1990; 15: 136-40.
25. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent. 1997; 22: 173- 85.
26. Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res. 1983; 62: 1076-81.
27. Schilke R, Bauss O, Lisson JA, Schuckar M, Geurtsen W. Bovine dentin as a substitute for human dentin in shear-bond strength measurements. Am J Dent. 1999; 12: 92-6.
28. Yap AU, Ng BL, Blackwood DJ. Corrosion behaviour of high copper dental amalgams. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31: 595-9.
29. Ilikli BG, Aydin A, Isimer A, Alpaslan G. In vitro corrosion behaviour and microhardness of high-copper amalgams with platinum and indium. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26: 170-6.
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email