Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Original Article

Efeitos da Luz Visível Azul Emitida por um Aparelho Fotopolimerizador sobre a Pele do Lábio de Coelhos

Effects of visible light resin-curing over rabbit’s lip skin

Petroucic, F.; Fontana, U.F.; Hetem, S.; Fontana, C.R.

Downloads: 3
Views: 1175


Foi estudado o efeito da luz visível azul emitida por um aparelho fotopolimerizador sobre a pele do lábio de coelhos. Os animais foram expostos à luz em períodos variáveis de tempo e de duração de exposição, tendo o mais longo atingido 30 minutos diariamente por 180 dias. Os resultados encontrados mostraram que a exposição à luz do fotopolimerizador nos períodos analisados não determinou alterações morfológicas macro ou microscopicamente nesses animais em comparação com os animais do grupo controle.


Luz azul, aparelho de fotopolimerização, alterações histológicas, pele do lábio.


It was studied the effect of visible blue light produced by a resin curing light photopolymerization device on the lip skin of rabbits. The animals were exposed to the light for several periods of time being the longest one as much as 180 days, 30 minutes daily. The results did not show harmful effects when the lip skin of treated animals was compared to that obtained from animals of the control group. Thus, based in our results, it was concluded that the rabbit lip skin exposure to the curing light of photopolymerization devices does not produce any deleterious effect in its morphology even after exposition of 30 minutes daily during 180 days.


Blue light, light cure unit, deleterious effects, lip skin


1. Abarca D. Novedades en fotodermatologia. Dermatologia. 1994; 10:271-6.

2. Adam Neto A. Efeitos agudos da luz fluorescente sobre as estruturas do bulbo ocular [Dissertação Mestrado em Oftalmologia]. Ribeirão Preto: Faculdade de Medicina da USP; 1981.

3. Alvarez C, Dorfman M, Minon S. Experiência de dos anos en el tratamiento con fototerapia. Arch Argent Dermatol. 1982; 36:181-9.

4. American Dental Association. Council of Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. Visible light-cured composites and activating units. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985; 110:100-3.

5. Birdsell DC, Bannon, PJ, Webb RB. Harmful effects of near ultraviolet radiation used for polymerization of a sealant and a composite resin. J Am Dent Assoc. 1977; 94:311-4.

6. Blankeneau R J. Wavelenght and intensity of seven systems for visible light-curing composite resins: a comparison study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983; 106:471-4.

7. Bloom E, Cleaver J, Sayre RM, Maibach HI, Plansky JR. Halogen lamp phototoxicity. Dermatology. 1996; 193:207-11.

8. Calkins JL, Hocheimer, BF. Retinal exposure from ophthalmoscopes, slit lamps and overhead surgical lamps. An analysis of potential hazards. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1980;19:1009-15.

9. Carvalho M. Comparação entre fototerapia convencional e de fibra óptica. J Pediatr. 1992; 68:289-92.

10. COLE C, Sambuco C, Forbes P, Davies R. Response to ultraviolet radiation: ear swelling in airless mice. Photodermatol. 1984; 1:114-8.

11. Cook WD. Spectral distributions of dental photopolymerization sources. J Dent Res. 1982;61:1436-8.

12. Costa LJ, Pinto RHR, Marcucci G. Xeroderma pigmentoso: aspectos gerais e apresentação de casos clínicos. RPG: Rev Pos-Grad. 1996; 3:123-6.

13. Cullen AP, Chou BR, Ahmedbhain N. Light –curing units and protective filters. J Can Dent Assoc. 1986;11:939-41.

14. Dental Products Report. Regular testing of curing lights helps reduce restoration failures. Medec Dental Communications Publication; 1991.

15. Dougherty T, Grindey GB, Fiel R, Weishaukt KR, Boyle DG. Photoradiation therapy II. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1984; 55:115-21.

16. Elder, RL. Hazard of ultraviolet radiation from fluorescent lamps to infant during phototherapy. J Pediatr. 1974; 84-145.

17. Ellingson OL, Land RJ, Bostrom RG. An evaluation of optical radiation emissions from dental visible photopolymerization devices. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986; 112:67-72.

18. Eriksen P, Moscato PM, Franks JK, Sliney DH. Optical hazard evaluation of dental curing lights. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1987; 15:187-201.

19. Fan PL, Wazniak WT, Reyes WD, Stanford JW. Irradiance of visible light-curing units and voltage variation effects. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987; 115:442-5.

20. Ferracane JL, Aday P, Matsumoto H, Marker VA. Relationship between shade and depth of cure for lightactivated dental composite resins. Dent Mater. 1986; 66:145-65.

21. Filgueira AL. Envelhecimento cutâneo preventivo. An. Bras. Dermatol. 1991; 66:145-165.

22. Fioravante C. Soldando o DNA. Pesquisa Fapesp. 2002; 82:44-7.

23. Flannery JG, Fisher SK. Light triggered red – disc she- dding in xenopus retina in vitro. Invest. Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1979; 18:638-40.

24. Friedman J. Viability of lamps characteristics in dental curing lights. J Esthet Dent. 1989; 1:189-90.

25. Friedman J. Care and maintenance of dental curing lights. Dent Today. 1991; 10:1-2.

26. Gladstone GJ, Tasman W. Solar retinitis after minimal exposure. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978; 96:1368-9.

27. Goette D K. Benign lichenoid keratosis. Arch Dermatol. 1980; 116:780-3.

28. Grayson M. Disease of the cornea. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1979.

29. Ham Jr WT, Ruffolo JJ Jr, Mueller HA, Guerry D. The nature of retinal radiation damage, dependence on wavelength. Power level and exposure time. Vision Res. 1980; 20:1105-11.

30. HUHuneke RB, Foltz CJ, Vande Woude S, Mandel TD, Garman RH. Characterization of dermatologic changes in geriatric rhesus macaques. J Med Primatol. 1996; 25:404-13.

31. Kligman AM, Grave GL, Hirose R, Leyden JJ. Topical tretinoin for photoaged skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986; 15:836-59.

32. Messner KH, Maisels MJ, Leure-Dupree AE. Phototoxicity to the newborn primate retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1978; 17:178-82.

33. Montenegro G, Pinto T, Guimarães C, Assunção M CA, Blazzio MD. Descobrindo seu fotopolimerizador . Rev. Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 2003; 57:66-71.

34. O’brien JP. Actinic granuloma the expanding significance. Int J Dermatol. 1985; 24:473-90.

35. Padilha Gonçalves A. Dermatites elastótica solaris. Arch Dermatol. 1984; 120:1613-9.

36. Pagnano PMG. Envelhecimento da pele e suas conseqüências. J Bras Psiquiatr. 1990; 39:37-41.

37. Parrish JA, Pitts DG, Urbach F. Safety of an ultravioletemitting instrument used in destistry for polymerizing resin systems. Dentsply International; 1975.

38. Pollack BF, Lewis HL. Visible light curing generators: an update. Gen Dent.1984; 32:193-7.

39. Rauterberg A, Jung EG, Burger R, Rauterberg E W. Phototoxic erythema following UVA treatment: independence of complement. J Invest Dermatol. 1990; 94:144-9.

40. Rock WP. The use of ultra-violet radiation in dentistry. Br Dent J. 1974; 136:455-8.

41. Roisenblatt J. Cuide-se bem: profissional saudável não tem idade. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 1999; 53:85-97.

42. Sisson TRC, Kendall N, Shaw E. Phototherapy of jaundice in the newborn infant.II. Effect of various light intensities. J Pediatr. 1972;8:35-8.

43. Spencer JM, Amonette R. Tanning beds and skin cancer: artificial sun + old sun = real risk. Clin Dermatol. 1998; 16:487-501.

44. Takema Y, Imoka WAG. The effects of UVA and UVB irradiation on the viscoelastic properties of hairless mouse skin in vivo. Dermatology. 1998; 196:397-400.

45. Walsberg G E, Weaver T, Wolf B O. Seasonal adjustment of solar heat independent of cost coloration in a desert mammal. Physiol. Zool. 1995; 70:150-7.
588017a87f8c9d0a098b4836 rou Articles
Links & Downloads

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Share this page
Page Sections