Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
https://revodontolunesp.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/rou.2014.046
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Original Article

Exames radiográficos solicitados no atendimento inicial de pacientes em uma Faculdade de Odontologia brasileira

Radiographic examination of patient’s initial care in a Brazilian Dental School

Moura, Lucas Borin; Blasco, Marco Aurelio Plá; Damian, Melissa Feres

Downloads: 2
Views: 1077

Resumo

Introdução: Para que radiografias ofereçam mais benefícios do que riscos, precisam ser realizadas ou solicitadas de acordo com cada situação clínica. Objetivo: Avaliar os exames radiográficos solicitados no atendimento inicial em uma Faculdade de Odontologia, considerando os sinais/sintomas e o motivo para busca pelo atendimento. Material e método: Foram avaliados os prontuários de 3.100 pacientes adultos, tratados em um período de três anos, excluindo aqueles em que os pacientes não haviam realizado exames radiográficos na consulta inicial. Numa amostra final de 1.567 prontuários, foram coletados os seguintes dados: idade e gênero, razão da procura pelo tratamento, presença de sinais e/ou sintomas, além da técnica e do número de radiografias realizadas. Os dados foram analisados por estatística descritiva. Resultado: 5.034 radiografias realizadas, com média de 3,24 (±2,97) por paciente. Entre as técnicas, a mais utilizada foi a periapical seguida pela panorâmica. Extração dentária e dor foram as razões mais prevalentes da procura pelo atendimento, enquanto dor, doença periodontal e presença de patologias de tecidos moles foram os sinais/sintomas mais comuns. Verificou-se que 35,41% da amostra não apresentou sinais ou sintomas. Conclusão: Há uma grande variação na requisição de radiografias no exame inicial, mostrando uma falha na aplicação de critérios de seleção de imagens para diagnóstico, o que pode levar à exposição desnecessária do paciente à radiação X.

Palavras-chave

Radiografia dentária, dosagem de radiação, guia de práticas clínicas, assistência odontológica, registros odontológicos

Abstract

Introduction: For X-rays offer more benefits than risks, they need to be performed or ordered according to each clinical situation. Objective: To evaluate the radiographic exams requested in the initial care in a dental school, considering signs/symptoms and the reported reasons for seeking care. Material and method: We evaluated the medical records of 3100 adult patients treated over a period of three years, and eliminated those who had not performed radiographic examinations in the initial care. In a final sample of 1567 records, was collected: age and gender, reason for seeking care, presence of signs and/or symptoms, beyond technique and the number of radiographs requested. The dates were analysed by descriptive statistics. Result: 5034 radiographs were made, mean of 3.24 (±2.97) per patient. Among the techniques, the most widely used was the periapical, followed by panoramic. Tooth extraction and pain were the most prevalent reasons for seeking care, while pain, periodontal disease and the presence of soft tissue pathologies were the signs/symptoms more common. 35.41% of the sample had no signs or symptoms. Conclusion: There is a wide variation in the request of radiographs for initial care showing a lack of application of criteria in the selection diagnostic imaging, which can lead to unnecessary exposure to radiation X.

Keywords

Radiography dental, radiation dosage, practice guidelines, dental care, dental records

References

 


1. American Dental Association. Council on Scientific Affairs. The use of dental radiographs: update and recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137(9): 1304-12. PMid:16946440. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0393

2. Kim IH, Mupparapu M. Dental radiographic guidelines: a review. Quintessence Int. 2009; 40(5): 389-98. PMid:19582243.

3. Beneyto YM, Baños MA, Lajarín LP, Rushton VE. Clinical justification of dental radiology in adult patients: a review of the literature. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007; 12: E244-51.

4. Hollender LG. Decision making in radiographic imaging. J Dent Educ. 1992; 56(1): 834-43. PMid:1487586.

5. Brooks SL. A study of selection criteria for intraoral dental radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986; 62(2): 234-9. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/0030-4220(86)90056-3

6. Stephens RG, Kogon SL. New U.S. guidelines for prescribing dental radiographs – a critical review. J Can Dent Assoc. 1990; 56(11): 1019- 24. PMid:2261588.

7. Brooks SL. Guidelines for radiologic examination: do we have all answer yet? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1997; 83(5): 523-4. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90113-X

8. American Dental Association. U.S. Department of Health and Human Service. Dental radiographic examination: recommendation for patient selection and limiting radiation exposure. Revised 2012. Available from: http://www.ada.org/5160.aspx?currentTab=2

9. White SC, Heslop EW, Hollender LG, Moiser KM, Ruprecht A., Shrout MK. Parameters of radiologic care: an official report of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radioloy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 91(5): 498-511. PMid:11346726. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.114380

10. European Commission. Radiation Protect n˚172. Cone Beam CT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. 2012. Available from: http:// www.sedentexct.eu/content/guidelines-cbct-dental-and-maxillofacial-radiology

11. Atchinson KA, White SC, Flack VF, Hewlett ER. Assessing the FDA guidelines for ordering dental radiographs. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995; 126(10): 1372-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0048

12. Shahab S, Kavosi A, Nazarinia H, Mehralizadeh S, Mohammadpour M, Emami M. Compliance of Iranian dentists with safety standards of oral radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012; 41(2): 159-64. PMid:22301640 PMCid:PMC3520373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/ dmfr/29207955

13. Kantor ML, Hill CH. Radiographic examination of comprehensive care patient in U.S. and Canadian dental school. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988; 65(6): 778-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(88)90029-1

14. Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. Routine panoramic radiography of new adult patients in general dental practices: relevancy of diagnostic yield to treatment and identification of radiographic selection criteria. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002; 93(4): 488-95. PMid:12029290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.121994

15. Bohay RN, Stephens RG, Kogon SL. Survey of radiographic practices of general dentists for the dentate adult patient. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995; 79(4): 526-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(05)80140-4

16. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância Sanitária. Portaria nº 453, de 1 de julho de 1998. Disponível em: http://www.abro. org.br/legislação

17. Napier ID. Reference doses for dental radiography. Br Dent J. 1999; 186(8): 392-6. PMid:10365461.

18. Peker I, Alkurt MT. Evaluation of radiographic errors made by undergraduate dental students in periapical radiography. N Y State Dent J. 2009; 75(5): 45-8. PMid:19882842.

19. Salti L, Whaites EJ. Survey of dental radiographic service in private dental clinics in Damascus, Syria. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002; 31(2): 100-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600676

 

5880196c7f8c9d0a098b5138 rou Articles
Links & Downloads

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Share this page
Page Sections