Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
https://revodontolunesp.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/rou.2014.028
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Original Article

Uso da rugoscopia palatina como ferramenta biométrica: um estudo populacional em Niterói-RJ, Brasil

Use of palatine rugoscopy as biometric tool: a population study in Niteroi, RJ, Brazil

Castro-Silva, Igor Luco; Silva, Olivia Machado L. da; Veiga, Bianca Melânia C.

Downloads: 0
Views: 1082

Resumo

Introdução: Pesquisas por métodos biométricos auxiliares em perícias têm crescido na Odontologia Legal. Objetivo: Este estudo avaliou a eficácia da rugoscopia palatina na identificação humana. Material e método: Foram utilizados 184 modelos de gesso de estudantes voluntários em Niterói-RJ, para delineamento de suas rugosidades palatinas, sendo classificadas segundo quantidade, direção (sistema de Carrea) e formato individual (sistema de Silva), e comparadas às variáveis demográficas sexo, cor da pele e idade. A análise estatística foi realizada com o teste qui-quadrado para amostras independentes, considerando-se p<0,05. Resultado: Houve maior prevalência de 2-7 rugas em homens. O tipo IV de Carrea e o tipo 1 de Silva foram mais evidentes, porém sem diferenças intergrupos significativas, de acordo com as variáveis propostas. Conclusão: A rugoscopia palatina é uma ferramenta biométrica viável e fornece informações morfológicas individuais relevantes, embora sua análise cega e em tempo único não exiba acurácia na estratificação populacional.

Palavras-chave

Odontologia Forense, palato duro, identificação biométrica

Abstract

Introduction: Researches by auxiliary biometric methods for skills have grown in Forensic Dentistry. Objective: This study evaluated the effectiveness of palatal rugoscopy in human identification. Material and method: They were used 184 plaster models of students volunteers in Niterói, RJ, performing the design of their palatal rugae sorted by amount, direction (Carrea’s pattern) and individual format (Silva’s pattern) and compared to the demographic variables gender, skin color and age. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test for independent samples and considering p<0.05. Result: There was a higher prevalence of 2-7 rugae in men. Carrea’s pattern IV and Silva’s pattern 1 were evident, but no significant intergroup differences in accord to the proposed variables. Conclusion: The palatal rugoscopy is a practicable biometric tool and it provides relevant individual morphological information, although its blind and one-time analysis not displays accurancy in population stratification.

Keywords

Forensic dentistry, palate, hard, biometric identification

References

 


1. Caldas IM, Magalhães T, Afonso A. Establishing identity using cheiloscopy and palatoscopy. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;165(1):1-9. PMid:16725290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.04.010

2. Castellanos DCA, Higuera LFH, Avella AMH, Gutiérrez APP, Martínez JAC. Identificación positiva por medio del uso de la rugoscopia en un município de Cundinamarca (Colombia): reporte de caso. Acta Odontol Venezol. 2007;45(3):446-9.

3. Castro-Silva II, Veiga BMC. O papel da odontologia na prática forense. Rev Trab Acad. 2012;3(5-supl.):1-11.

4. English WR, Robinson DHD, Summitt JB, Oeslerle LJ, Brannon RB, Marlang WM. Individuality of human palatal rugae. J Forensic Sci. 1988;33(3):718-26. PMid:3385381.

5. Valenzuela A, Martin-de las Heras S, Marques T, Exposito N, Bohoyo JM. The application of dental methods of identification to human burn victims in a mass disaster. Int J Legal Med. 2000;113(4):236-9. PMid:10929240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004149900099

6. Martins-Filho IE, Sales-Peres SHC, Sales-Peres A, Carvalho SPM. Palatal rugae patterns as bioindicators of identification in Forensic Dentistry. RFO/UPF. 2009;14(3):227-33.

7. Kavitha B, Einstein A, Sivapathasundharam B, Saraswathi TR. Limitations in forensic odontology. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2009;1(1):8-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2948.50881

8. Nedel F, Nedel AP, Silva RHA, Lund RG. Evaluation of identification cases involving forensic dentistry in the city of Pelotas, RS, Brazil, 2004-2006. Braz J Oral Sci. 2009;8(1):55-8.

9. Bansode SC, Kulkarni MM. Importance of palatal rugae in individual identification. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2009;1(2):77-81. http://dx.doi. org/10.4103/0974-2948.60378

10. Jurado J, Martínez JM, Quenguán R, Martínez C, Moreno F. Análisis de rugas palatinas en jóvenes pertenecientes a dos grupos étnicos colombianos. Rev Estomatol. 2009;17(2):17-22.

11. Barbieri AA, Scoralick RA, Naressi SCM, Moraes MEL, Daruge Jr. E, Daruge E. The evidence of the rugoscopy efectiveness as a human identification method in patients submitted to rapid palatal expansion. J Forensic Sci. 2013;58(Suppl 1):S235-8. PMid:22937817. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02263.x

12. Miranda RF, Lima LNC, Tinoco RLR, Rabello PM, Costa-e-Silva APS, Daruge Jr E. Palatal rugoscopy as a method of human identification. Odonto. 2011;19(38):71-9.

13. Oliveira DD, Ruellas ACO, Drummond MEL, Pantuzo MCG, Lanna AMQ. Confiabilidade do uso de modelos digitais tridimensionais como exame auxiliar ao diagnóstico. Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2010;12(1):27-31.

14. España L, Paris A, Florido R, Arteaga F, Solórzano E. Estudio de las características individualizantes de las rugas palatinas. Caso: bomberos de la Universidad de Los Andes Mérida - Venezuela. Cuad Med Forense 2010;16(4):199-204.

15. Shetty M, Premalatha K. Study of palatal rugae pattern among the student population in Mangalore. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2011;33(2):112-5.

16. Fahmi FM, Al-Shamrani SM, Talic YF. Rugae pattern in a Saudi population sample of males and females. Saudi Dent J. 2001;13(2):92-5.

17. Hermosilla V, Valenzuela JSP, López MC, Galdames ICS. Palatal rugae: systematic analysis of its shape and dimensions for use in human identification. Int J Morphol. 2009;27(3):819-25.

18. Kapali S, Townsend G, Richards L, Parish T. Palatal rugae patterns in Australian Aborigines and Caucasians. Aust Dent J. 1997;42(2):129-

33. PMid:9153843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1997.tb00110.x

19. Paliwal A, Wanjari S, Parwani R. Palatal rugoscopy: establishing identity. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2010;2(1):27-31. PMid:21189987 PMCid:PMC3009548. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2948.71054

20. Saraf A, Bedia S, Indurkar A, Degwekar S, Bhowate R. Rugae patterns as an adjunt to sex differentiation in forensic identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2011;29(1):14-9. PMid:21841264.

21. Shukla D, Chowdhry A, Bablani D, Jain P, Thapar R. Establishing the reliability of palatal rugae pattern in individual identification (following orthodontic treatment). J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2011;29(1):20-9. PMid:21841265.

 

588019687f8c9d0a098b5128 rou Articles
Links & Downloads

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Share this page
Page Sections