Estudo comparativo entre dois protocolos anestésicos envolvendo bloqueio do nervo alveolar inferior convencional e de Vazirani‑Akinosi para exodontia de terceiro molar inferior
Comparative study of two anaesthetic protocols involving conventional and Vazirani‑Akinosi alveolar inferior nerve block for lower third molar extraction
Borges, Danilo de Paula R.; Souza, Liane Maciel de Almeida; Souto, Maria Luisa S.; Dantas, Liliane Poconé; Paixão, Mônica Silveira; Groppo, Francisco Carlos
Resumo
Introdução: O bloqueio do nervo alveolar inferior (BNAI) apresenta alta porcentagem de falha na Odontologia. A fim de melhorar esse índice, vêm‑se estudando diferentes alternativas, como diferentes técnicas e soluções anestésicas. Objetivo: Avaliar duas diferentes técnicas – técnica convencional e de Vazirani‑Akinosi – para o bloqueio do nervo alveolar inferior, bem como compará‑las quanto à sua efetividade e quantificar o percentual de aspirações positivas nas duas diferentes técnicas. Material e método: Foram avaliados 160 pacientes de ambos os sexos, sendo 80 submetidos ao bloqueio do nervo alveolar inferior de Vazirani‑Akinosi e bloqueio do nervo bucal (G1), e 80 submetidos ao bloqueio do nervo alveolar inferior convencional e ao bloqueio do nervo bucal (G2). Em ambos os grupos, utilizou‑se a combinação de articaína 4% com epinefrina 1:100.000 para bloqueio do nervo bucal, e lidocaína 2% com epinefrina 1:100.000 para bloqueio do nervo alveolar inferior. Foram avaliados: a quantidade de aspirações positivas, a eficácia da anestesia e o momento em que ocorreu a falha anestésica durante o procedimento cirúrgico. Resultado: Não houve diferenças estatisticamente significantes (p = 0,2453) entre os grupos G1 e G2 observando‑se a eficácia e o índice de aspirações positivas, e o momento em que ocorreu a falha anestésica, observando‑se uma maior eficácia de ambas as técnicas, quando comparadas com a literatura (90%) Conclusão: Não houve diferença significativa entre o BNAI pela técnica convencional e o BNAI pela técnica de Vazirani‑Akinosi quanto a quantidade de aspirações positivas e eficácia, sendo que o uso da articaína 4% com
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Introduction: The inferior alveolar nerve block has a high percentage of failure in dentistry. To improve this ratio, has been studied different alternatives, as different techniques, as well as anesthetics. Objective: Evaluate two different techniques (conventional technique and Vazirani‑Akinosi) for inferior alveolar nerve block, and compare them regarding their effectiveness and quantify the percentage of positive aspirations in both techniques. Material and method: 160 patients were evaluated for both sex, with 80 undergoing Vazirani‑Akinosi technique plus buccal nerve block (G1), and 80 to conventional inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal nerve block (G2), both groups using a combination of 4% articaine with 1:100.000 epinephrine to buccal nerve block and 2% lidocaine with 1:100.000 epinephrine to inferior alveolar nerve block. We evaluated the amount of positive aspirations, the effectiveness or not of anesthesia (pain) and when it occurred during the surgical procedure. Result: There were no statistically significant differences (p = 0.2453) between G1 and G2 observing the positive aspiration. It was obtained efficiency of 90% for both techniques. Conclusion: No significant difference between the conventional alveolar inferior nerve block technique and Vazirani‑Akinosi alveolar nerve block technique considering the amount of positive aspirations and efficacy, and the use of 4% articaine with 1:100.000 epinephrine in buccal nerve block possibly increased the anesthetic efficacy of both techniques.
Keywords
References
1. Goldberg S, Reader A, Drum M, Nusstein J, Beck M. Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of the conventional inferior alveolar, Gow‑Gates, and Vazirani‑Akinosi techniques. J Endod. 2008; 34:1306‑11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.025
2. Malamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2004.
3. Hargreaves KM, Keiser K. Local anesthetic failure in endodontics: mechanisms and management. Endod Topics. 2002; 1:26‑39. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1601‑1546.2002.10103.x
4. Kuster CG, Udin RD. Frequency of accidental intravascular injection of local anesthetics in children. J Dent Child. 1985 May‑Jun; 52(3):183‑7.
5. Harris SC. Aspiration before injection of dental local anesthetics. J Oral Surg. 1957; 15:299‑303.
6. Taghavi Zenouz A, Ebrahimi H, Mahdipour M, Pourshahidi S, Amini P, Vatankhah M. The incidence of intravascular needle entrance during inferior alveolar nerve block injection. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2008 Winter; 2(1):38‑41. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2008.008. Epub 2008 May 15.
7. Vasconcelos BCE, Freitas KCM, Almeida RAC, Mauricio HA. A importância da técnica de aspiração prévia ao bloqueio anestésico do nervo alveolar inferior. Rev Cir Traumatol Buco‑Maxilo‑Fac. 2007; 7:29‑36.
8. Martínez‑González JM, Peña BB, Cáliz FF, Marín LSH, DiagoMP. Estudio comparativo entre el bloqueo mandibular directo y la técnica de Akinosi. Med Oral. 2003; 8:143‑9.
9. Sisk AL. Evaluation of the akinosi mandibular block technique in oral surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986; 44:113‑5. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/0278‑2391(86)90192‑8
10. Rowson JE, Preshaw PM. The use of lignocaine in dental practice: results of a survey of a group of general and hospital dental practitioners. J Dent. 1997; 25:431‑3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300‑5712(96)00062‑0
11. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Efficacy of articaine: a new amide local anesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000; 131:635‑42. http://dx.doi. org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0237
12. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, LeBlanc D. Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001; 132:177‑85. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0152
13. Hersh EV, Giannakopoulos H, Levin LM, Secreto S, Moore PA, Peterson C, et al. The pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular effects of high‑dose articaine with 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 epinephrine. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Nov; 137(11):1562‑71. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/ jada.archive.2006.0092
14. Srinivasan N, Kavitha M, Loganathan CS, Padmini G. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107:133‑6. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.002
15. Isen DA. Articaine: pharmacology and clinical use of a recently approved local anesthetic. Dent Today. 2000; 19:72‑7.
16. Oertel R, Rahn R, Kirch W. Clinical pharmacokinetics of articaine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997; 33:417‑25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/000 03088‑199733060‑00002
17. Tortamano IP, Siviero M, Costa CG, Buscariolo IA, Armonia PL. A comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 2009; 35:165‑8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.020
18. Claffey E, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M, Weaver J. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with irreversible pulpitis. J Endod. 2004 Aug; 30(8):568‑71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000125317.21892.8F
19. Mikesell P, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M, Weaver J. A comparison of articaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks. J Endod. 2005 Apr; 31(4):265‑70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000140576.36513.cb
20. Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Corbett IP, Meechan JG. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double‑blind crossover study. J Endod. 2006; 32:296‑8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.016
21. Robertson D, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M, McCartney M. The anesthetic efficacy of articaine in buccal infiltration of mandibular posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007 Aug; 138(8):1104‑12. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0324
22. Jung IY, Kim JH, Kim ES, Lee CY, Lee SJ. An evaluation of buccal infiltrations and inferior alveolar nerve blocks in pulpal anesthesia for mandibular first molars. J Endod. 2008 Jan; 34(1):11‑3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.09.006
23. Nusstein J, Reacher A, Beck M. Anesthetic efficacy different volumes of lidocaine with epinephrine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks. Gen Dent. 2002; 50:372–5, quiz 376‑7.
24. Lai TN, Lin CP, Kok SH, Yang PJ, Kuo YS, Lan WH, et al. Evaluation of mandibular block using a standardized method. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Oct; 102(4):462‑8. Epub 2006 Jun 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.003
25. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Kabi D. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of Gow‑Gates mandibular conduction anesthesia, Vazirani‑Akinosi technique, buccal‑plus‑lingual infiltrations, and conventional inferior alveolar nerve anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Feb; 109(2):303‑8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. tripleo.2009.09.016
26. van Eden SP, Patel MF. Prolonged paraesthesia following inferior alveolar nerve block using articaine. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002 Dec; 40(6):519‑20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0266435602002231
27. Garisto GA, Gaffen AS, Lawrence HP, Tenenbaum HC, Haas DA. Occurrence of paresthesia after dental local anesthetic administration in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010; 41:836‑44. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0281
28. Pogrel MA. Permanent nerve damage from inferior alveolar nerve blocks: a current update. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2012; 40:795‑7.
29. Pell GJ, Gregory BT. Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified techniques for removal. Dent Digest. 1933; 39: 330‑8.
30. Avellanal CD. Tratado de odontologia: cirurgia odontomaxilar. Buenos Aires: Editora Ediar; 1946.
31. Frangiskos F, Stavrou E, Merenditis N, Tsitsogianis H, Vardas E, Antonopoulou I. Incidence of penetration of a blood vessel during inferior alveolar nerve block. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Jun; 41(3):188‑9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0266‑4356(03)00045‑7
32. Meechan JG, Blair GS. Clinical experience in oral surgery with 2 different automatic aspirating syringes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989 Apr; 18(2):87‑9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0901‑5027(89)80137‑7
33. Corbett IP, Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars. J Endod. 2008 May;34(5):514‑8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.042
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email