Resistência à tração diametral de cimentos de ionômero de vidro submetidos à aplicação de ondas de ultrassom
Diametral tensile strength of glass ionomer cements subjected to of ultrasound waves
Souza, Mônica Irma A. V. de; Azavedo, Elcilaine Rizzato; Santos-Pinto, Lourdes Aparecida M. dos; Zuanon, Ângela Cristina Cilense
Resumo
Introdução: O cimento de ionômero de vidro é um material odontológico que apresenta limitações de uso devido às suas propriedades mecânicas, como baixa resistência ao desgaste, microdureza, compressão e tração diametral. Com base nisso, este estudo investigou o efeito da excitação ultrassônica sobre o CIV, em diferentes tempos de aplicação, por meio da resistência à tração diametral. Material e método: Os materiais utilizados foram o Ketac Molar Easymix (KME) e o Ketac Cem Easymix (KCE). Foram confeccionados 10 corpos de prova para cada condição estudada: grupo controle, e os grupos que receberam aplicação de ultrassom por 15s, 30s e 45s, para ambos materiais. A excitação ultrassônica foi aplicada durante a reação de presa inicial do CIV, logo após sua inserção na matriz de silicone. Os valores de resistência à tração diametral foram analisados pelo teste Shapiro Wilk e Anova (α = 0.05). Resultado: A aplicação de excitação ultrassônica não apresentou efeito estatisticamente significante na resistência à tração diametral dos materiais testados, independente do tempo de aplicação (p ≥ 0,05). O KME apresentou resistência estatisticamente maior que o KCE (p = 0,023). Conclusão: A utilização das ondas ultrassônicas não influenciou na resistência à tração diametral dos CIV testados independentemente do seu tempo de aplicação.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Introduction: The glass ionomer cement is a dental material that has limitations of use due to its mechanical properties, such as low wear resistance, hardness, tensile and compressive diametral. Based on this, this study investigated the effect of ultrasonic excitation on the GIC in different application times, through the diametral tensile strength. Material and method: The materials used were Ketac Molar EasyMix (KME) and Ketac Cem EasyMix (KCE). Were made 10 specimens for each condition studied: control group, and the groups that received application of ultrasound for 15s, 30s and 45s, for both materials. The ultrasonic excitation was applied during the initial setting reaction of GIC, soon after its insertion into the silicone matrix. The values of the diametral tensile strength were analyzed by Shapiro Wilk test and ANOVA (α = 0.05). Result: The application of ultrasonic excitation showed no statistically significant effect on diametral tensile strength of the materials tested, regardless of the time of application (p ≥ 0.05). The KME resistance showed statistically greater than the KCE (p = 0.023). Conclusion: The use of ultrasound waves did not influence the diametral tensile strength of CIV tested regardless of their time of application.
Keywords
References
1. Mount GJ. Glass ionomers: a review of their current status. Oper Dent. 1999;24:115-24. PMid:10483449.
2. McLean JW. Limitations of posterior compost resins and extending their use with glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int. 1987;18:517-29. PMid:3507719.
3. Mount GJ. Glass ionomer cements: ast, present and future. Oper Dent. 1994;19:82-90. PMid:9028245.
4. McLean JW. Glass-ionomer cement. Br Dent J. 1988; 164: 293-300. PMid:3289597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4806434
5. Kramer PF, Pires LAG, Tovo MF, Kersting TC, Guerra S. Grau de infiltração marginal de duas técnicas restauradoras com cimento de ionômero de vidro em molares decíduos: Estudo comparativo "in vitro". J Appl Oral Sci. 2003;11(2):114-9. PMid:21409323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572003000200006
6. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res. 1997;76:883-94. PMid:9126185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760041001
7. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 2000;16:129-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00093-7
8. Pereira LC, Nunes MC, Dibb RG, Powers JM, Roulet JF, Navarro MF. Mechanical properties and bond strength of glass-ionomer cements. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4:73-80. PMid:12071632.
9. Yap AUJ, Pek YS, Cheang P. Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:1-8. PMid:12485377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01006.x
10. McKinney JE, Antonucci JM, Rupp NW. Wear and microhardness of glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1134-9. PMid:3476584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660060801
11. Corrêa LGP, Ogasawara T. Estudos comparativos de alguns cimentos ionoméricos convencionais. Matéria. 2006;11(3):297-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-70762006000300019
12. Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Payan J, F Moya, Meyer JM. Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Mater Dent. 1999;15(1):71-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00016-0
13. Balamuth L. Ultrasonics and dentistry. Sound. 1963;2:15-9.
14. Towler MR, Bushby AJ, Billington RW, Hill RG. A preliminary comparison of the mechanical properties of chemically cures and ultrasonically cures glass ionomer cements, using nano-indentation techniques. Biomaterials. 2001;22:1401-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00297-0
15. Kleverlaan CJ, van Duinen RN, Feilzer AJ. Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements affected by curing methods. Dent Mater. 2004;20(1):45-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00067-8
16. Twomey E, Towler MR, Crowley CM, Doyle J, Hanspshire S. Investigation into the ultrasonic setting of glass ionomer cements. Part II: setting times and compressive strengths. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004;39:4631-2.
17. Tanner DA, Rushe N, Towler MR. Ultrasonically set glass polyalkenoate cements for orthodontic applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006;17(4):313-8. PMid:16617409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-8229-7
18. Mitra SB, Kedrowski BL. Long-term mechanical properties of glass ionomers. Dent Mater. 1994;10(2):78-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90044-2
19. Fagundes TC, Barata TJE, Bresciani E, Cefaly DFG, Carvalho CAR, Navarro MFL. Influence of ultrasonic setting on tensile bond strength of glass-ionomer cements to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8(6):401-7. PMid:17243598.
20. Towler MR, Crowley CM, Hill RG. Investigation into the ultrasonic setting of glass ionomer cement: Part I: postulated modalities. J Mater Sci Lett. 2003;22(7):539-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022946605523
21. Vérez-Fraguela Jl, Vallés MAV, Calvo LJE. Effects of ultrasonic dental scaling on pulp vitality in dogs: an experimental study. J Vet Dent. 2000;17:75-9. PMid:11968922.
22. Mitchell DF, Jensen JR. Preliminary report on the reation of the dental pulp to cavity preparation on ultrasonic device. J Acad Dent Am . 1957;66:57-62.
23. Arcoria CJ, Butler JR, Wagner MJ and Vitasek BA. Bending strength of Fuji® and Ketac® glass ionomers after sonication. J Oral Rehabil. 1992;19:607-13. PMid:1469496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01490.x
24. Lopes JHP, Guimarães MS, Coldebella CR, Zuanon ACC. Evoluation of ultrasonic waves application on glass ionomer cements: superficial roughness and hardness. ROBRAC: Rev Odontol Bras Central. 2010;19(48):42-7.
25. Prentice LH, Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. The effect of mixing time on the handling and compressive strength of an encapsulated glass-ionomer cement. Dent Mater. 2005;21(8):704-8. PMid:16026665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.09.006
26. Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ. The influence of environmental conditions on the material properties of setting glass-ionomer cement. Dent Mater. 2006;22:852-6. PMid:16376421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.013
27. Barata TJE, Bresciani E, Adachi A Fagundes TC, Carvalho CAR, Navarro MF'. Influence of ultrasonic setting on compressive and diametral tensile strengths of glass ionomer cements. Mater Res. 2008;11:55-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392008000100011
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email