Fluorescence intensity in composite resin: influence of superficial polishing and storage means
Intensidade de fluorescência em resina composta: influência do polimento superficial e dos meios de armazenagem
Nora, Ângela Dalla; Bueno, Renata Plá Rizzolo; Pozzobon, Roselaine Terezinha
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-25772013000200007
Rev. odontol. UNESP, vol.42, n2, p.104-109, 2013
Abstract
Resin composite is a versatile material in cosmetic dentistry due mainly to its optical properties, fluorescence among them. There are a few studies which assessed such property and a comparison of results becomes difficult due to the lack of a pattern in the specimens storage and confection methodologies. Objective: Verify the influence of superficial polishing and means of storage in in vitro studies that assess the optical property of fluorescence in dental resin composites. Material and method: 70 circular specimens (10 mm × 2 mm) were prepared with microhybrid composite resin (Opallis, - A2E - FGM). The means of storage were: deionized water, tap water and artificial saliva. The superficial polishing protocols used 600, 1200 and 2500 sandpaper grit sizes, accomplished with polisher after specimens were obtained. The fluorescence intensity values were assessed using Cary Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer after 1, 7 and 21 days. Result: There was not a statistically significant difference in Fluorescence Intensity among the groups submitted to the different polishing protocols. Concerning the means of storage, from the seventh day on the fluorescence variation was significantly bigger in tap and deionized water, compared to artificial saliva, such result kept on after 21 days. Conclusion: the superficial polishing protocol did not promote significant changes in the assessed resin composite fluorescence. Regarding the means of storage, the fluorescence intensity was less affected when in artificial saliva.
Keywords
Composite resins, fluorescence, esthetics, dental.
Resumo
A resina composta é um material versátil em Odontologia Estética, principalmente por suas propriedades ópticas, dentre as quais a fluorescência. Poucos são os estudos que avaliaram esta propriedade e a comparação dos resultados encontrados torna-se difícil em função da inexistência de padronização nas metodologias na confecção e na armazenagem dos corpos de prova. Objetivo: Verificar a influência do polimento superficial e do meio de armazenagem, em estudos in vitro, em que se avalia a propriedade óptica de fluorescência em resinas compostas. Material e método: Foram preparados 70 corpos de prova circulares (10 mm × 2 mm ) com resina composta microhíbrida (Opallis,- A2E - FGM.) Os meios de armazenagem foram: água deionizada, água da torneira e saliva artificial. Os protocolos de polimento superficial, realizados em politriz após a obtenção dos corpos de prova, utilizaram lixas de granulações 600, 1200 e 2500. Os valores de intensidade de fluorescência foram avaliados através do espectrofotômetro Cary Eclipse, após 1, 7 e 21 dias. Resultado: Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa na Intensidade de Fluorescência entre os grupos submetidos aos diferentes protocolos de polimento. Quanto aos meios de armazenagem, a partir do sétimo dia, a variação de fluorescência foi significativamente maior em água da torneira e deionizada, quando comparada à variação observada em saliva artificial, resultado que se manteve após 21 dias. Conclusão: O protocolo de polimento superficial não promoveu alterações significativas na fluorescência da resina composta avaliada. Quanto ao meio de armazenagem, a intensidade de fluorescência foi menos afetada quando em saliva artificial.
Palavras-chave
Resinas compostas, fluorescência, estética dentária.
Referências
1. Takahashi MK, Vieira S, Rached RN, de Almeida JB, Aguiar M, de Souza EM. Fluorescence intensity of resin composites and dental tissues before and after accelerated aging: a comparative study. Oper Dent. 2008 Mar-Apr; 33(2):189-95. PMid:18435194. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/07-74
2. Villalta P, Lu H, Okte Z, Garcia-Godoy F, Powers JM. Effects of staining and bleaching on color change of dental composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95 (2):137-42. PMid:16473088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.11.019
3. Ayad NM. The Effect of a current home bleaching agent on the color of nine tooth-colored restorative materials stained with common beverages: an in vitro study. Internet Journal of Dental Science. 2009; 6 (2): 14.
4. Fay RM, Servo T, Powers JM. Color of restorative materials after staining and bleaching. Oper Dent. 1999; 24: 292-6. PMid:10823076.
5. Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Difference in the colour and colour change of dental resin composites by the background. J Oral Rehabil. 2005; 32: 227-33. PMid:15707434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01402.x
6. Park MY, Lee YK, Lim BS. Influence of fluorescent whitening agent on the fluorescent emission of resin composites. Dent Mater. 2007; 23: 731-5. PMid:16911821. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.028
7. Baratieri LN, Araujo E, Monteiro Junior S. Color in natural teeth and direct resin composite restorations: essencial aspects. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2007; 2(2): 172-86. PMid:19655564.
8. Yu B, Lee YK. Differences in color, translucency and fluorescence between flowable and universal resin composites. J Dent. 2008; 36 (10): 840-6. PMid:18621459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.06.003
9. Queiroz RS, Bandéca MC, Calixto LR, Gaiao U, Cuin A, Porto-Neto ST. Influence of the light-curing unit, storage time and shade of a dental composite resin on the fluorescence. Laser Physics. 2010;20(7):1647-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1054660X10130165
10. Baran GR, O'Brien WJ, Tien TY. Colored emission of rare earth ions in a potassium feldspar glass. J Dent Res. 1977; 56(11):1323-9. PMid:274451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345770560110401
11. Reis RSA, Casemiro LA, Carlino GV, Lins EC, Kurachi C, Bagnato VS, et al. Evaluation of fluorescence of dental composites using contrast ratios to adjacent tooth structure: a pilot study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19:199–207. PMid:17635326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00100.x
12. Soderholm K-JM, Mukherjee R, Longmate J. Filler leachability of composites stored in distilled water or artificial saliva. J Dent Res. 1996; 75(9):1692–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750091201
13. Soderholm K-JM, Achanta S, Olsson S. Variables affecting the water diffusion coefficient of experimental composites. J Dent Res. 1994; 73(Spec Issue):106.
14. Carreiro AFP, Cruz CAS, Vergani CE. Hardness and compressive strength of indirect compositeresins: effects of immersion in distilled water. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31: 1085–9. PMid:15525387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01147.x
15. Musanje L, Darvell BW. Aspects of water sorption from the air, water and artificial saliva in resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2003;19: 414–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00085-4
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email