Exacerbated activity of the buccinator muscle in subjects Angle Class III malocclusion
Atividade exacerbada do músculo bucinador em sujeitos com má oclusão de Angle Classe III
Nagae, Mirian Hideko; Bérzin, Fausto; Alves, Marcelo Corrêa
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-25772012000600003
Rev. odontol. UNESP, vol.41, n6, p.384-389, 2012
Abstract
Studies describe the role of the buccinators muscle as controlling the bolus during mastication. Little is known, however, about its behavior in subjects with different dental and skeletal standards, which would contribute to the development of orthodontic and orthognathic treatments. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the electromyographic activity of the buccinator muscle, in subjects Class III Angle, during mastication. Material and method: The sample was composed by 32 healthy subjects, without Temporomandibular Disfunction, during mastication, being 16 Class I and 16 Class III. In order to guarantee the reliability of the caption of the signal, differential electrode were used, as well as function tests, correlation and normalization of data. As the data revealed a non-normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test), the median test was carried out, establishing then the level of significance in 5%. Result: In the comparison of the normalized data of the variable Root Means Square (RMS) (µV), from the active period, no significant differences were found (Classe I: 0,469 ± 0,355; Classe III: 0,531 ± 0,355 – p: 0,4812). Nonetheless, in comparison to the variables RMS (µV) from the inactive period (Classe I: 0,359 ± 0,355; Classe III: 0,641 ± 0,355 – p; 0,0016), duration of the active period (ON) (Classe I: 0,313 ± 0,180; Classe III: 0,687 ± 0,180 – p: 0,0368) and the result between the RMS of the inactive period and the RMS of the active period (RIA) Classe I: 0,391 ± 0,355; Classe III: 0,609 ± 0.355 – p: 0,0137) significant differences were found. Conclusion: Based in the results of the data analysis, we could to comprove the existence of exacerbated activity of the buccinator muscle in Angle’s Class III subjects.
Keywords
Buccinators, electromyography, Angle Class III malocclusion, mastication.
Resumo
Estudos descrevem a função do músculo bucinador como controlador do bolo alimentar durante a mastigação. Pouco se sabe, entretanto, sobre seu comportamento em sujeitos com distintos padrões dentário e esquelético, o que contribuiria para o desenvolvimento dos tratamentos ortodônticos e ortognático. Objetivo: Este estudo tem como objetivo investigar a atividade eletromiográfica do músculo bucinador, em sujeitos Classe III de Angle, durante a mastigação. Material e método: A amostra foi constituída por 32 sujeitos saudáveis, sem Disfunção Temporomandibular durante a mastigação, sendo 16 sujeitos Classe I e 16 sujeitos Classe III. Para garantir a fidedignidade da captação do sinal, foram utilizados eletrodos diferenciais, além de testes de função, correlação e normalização dos dados. Na medida em que os dados revelaram uma distribuição não normal (teste de Shapiro-Wilk), realizou-se teste da mediana, sendo estabelecido o nível de significância em 5%. Resultado: Na comparação dos dados normalizados da variável Root Means Square (RMS) (µV), do período ativo, não foram encontradas diferenças significativas (Classe I: 0,469 ± 0,355; Classe III: 0,531 ± 0,355 – p: 0,4812). Entretanto, em relação às variáveis RMS (µV) do período inativo (Classe I: 0,359 ± 0,355; Classe III: 0,641 ± 0,355 – p: 0,0016), duração do período ativo (ON) (Classe I: 0,313 ± 0,180; Classe III: 0,687 ± 0,180 – p: 0,0368) e razão entre o RMS do período inativo e RMS do período ativo (RIA) (Classe I: 0,391 ± 0,355; Classe III: 0,609 ± 0.355 – p: 0,0137), foram observadas diferenças significativas. Conclusão: A partir dos dados obtidos, pôde-se constatar uma atividade exacerbada do músculo bucinador nos sujeitos Classe III de Angle.
Palavras-chave
Bucinador, eletromiografia, má oclusão de Angle Classe III, mastigação.
References
1. Ahlgren J, Henrikson T, Sonesson B. EMG studies of buccinator mechanism. Craniofacial growth theory and orthodontic treatment. In: D.S. Carlson DS, editor. Craniofacial growth series 23. Center for Human Growth & Development. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; 1990. p. 171-85.
2. Blanton PL, Biggs NL, Perkins RC. Electromyographic analysis of the buccinator muscle. J Dent Res. 1970; 49: 389-94. PMid:5264602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345700490023201
3. Happak W, Burggasser G, Gruber H. Histochemical characteristics of human mimic muscles. J Neurol Sci. 1988; 83: 25-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(88)90017-2
4. Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Maeda M, Ariji Y, Ariji E, Langlais RP.Three dimensional computed tomography evaluation of facial asymmetry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 99:212-20. PMid:15660095. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.072
5. Palinkas M, Bataglion C, Regalo SCH, Nassar MSP, Siéssere S, Petenusci SO, et al. Mordida aberta anterior: eletromiografia e eficiência mastigatória antes e após uso da placa oclusal. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2007; 36: resumo 134.
6. Moss JP. Function – fact or fiction? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1975; 67: 625-46.
7. Raustia AM, Oikarinen KS. Changes in electrical activity of masseter and temporal muscles after mandibular sagital split osteotomy. Int J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 1994; 23: 253-7.
8. Subtelny JD. Malocclusion, orthodontic corrections and orofacial muscle adaptation. Angle Orthod. 1970; 40: 170-201. PMid:5269951.
9. Takada K, Yashiro K, Sorihashi Y, Morimoto T, Sakuda M. Tongue, jaw, and lip muscle activity and jaw movement during experimental chewing efforts in man. J Dent Res. 1996; 75: 1598-606. PMid:8906129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750081201
10. Takeda H, Nakamura Y, Handa H, Ishii H, Hamada Y, Seto K. Examination of masticatory movement and rhythm before and after surgical orthodontics in skeletal Class III patients with unilateral posterior cross-bite. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2009; 67: 1844-9. PMid:19686920. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.027
11. Harn SD, Shackelford LS. Further evaluation of the superficial and deep tendons of the human temporalis muscle. Anat Rec. 1982; 202: 537‑48. PMid:7072995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092020413
12. Vitti M, Basmajian JV. Integrated actions of masticatory muscles: simultaneous EMG from eight intramuscular electrodes. Anat Rec. 1976; 187:173-90. PMid:848775. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091870205
13. Jardini RSR, Ruiz LSR, Moysés MAA. Electromyographic Analysis of the Masseter and Buccinator Muscles with the Pro-Fono Exerciser use in bruxers. J Craniomandibular Practice. 2006; 24: 29-37.
14. Dutra EH, Caria PH, Rafferty KL, Herring SW. The buccinators during mastication: a functional and anatomical evaluation in minipigs. Arch Oral Biol. 2010; 55: 627-38. PMid:20621287 PMCid:2920343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.06.004
15. Wictorin L, Hedegard B, Lundberg M. Masticatory function – a cineradiographic study III. Position of the bolus in individuals with full complement of natural teeth. Acta Odontol Scand. 1968; 26: 213-22. PMid:5247258. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016356809026134
16. D'andrea E, Barbaix E. Anatomic research on the perioral muscles, functional matrix of the maxillary and mandibular bones. Surg Radiol Anat. 2006; 28: 261-6. PMid:16547604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00276-006-0095-y
17. Eckardt L, Harzer W, Schneevoigt R. Comparative study of excitation patterns in the masseter muscle before and after orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1997; 25: 344-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(97)80037-6
18. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Merletti R, Hägg G, Stegeman D, Blok J, et al., editors. SENIAM 8: European recommendations for surface electromyography. Roessingh Research and Development bv; 1999. ISBN: 90-75452-15-2
19. Winter DA, Fuglevand AJ, Archer SE. Crosstalk in surface electromyography: theoretical and practical estimates. J Electromgr Kinesiol. 1994; 4(1): 15-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1050-6411(94)90023-X
20. De Luca CJ. The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J Appl Biomech. 1997; 13: 135-63.
21. Dimitrov GV, Disselhorst Klug C , Dimitrova NA , Dimitrova NA, Schulte E, Rau G. Simulation analysis of the ability of different types of multielectrodes to increase selectivity of detection and to reduce crosstalk. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003; 13: 125-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(02)00095-0
22. Tallgren A, Christiansen RL, Ash MM, Miller RL. Effects of a myofunctional appliance on orofacial muscle activity and structures. Angle Orthod. 1998; 68: 249-58. PMid:9622762.
23. Schieppati M, Di Francesco G, Nardone A. Patterns of activity of perioral facial muscles during mastication in man. Exp Brain Res. 1989; 77: 103-12. PMid:2792253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00250572
24. Hanawa S, Tsuboi A, Watanabe M, Sasaki K. EMG study for perioral facial muscles function during mastication. J Oral Rehabil. 2008; 35:159‑70. PMid:18254793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01747.x
25. The MathWorks Inc. Matlab: the language of technical computing, version 7.10. The MathWorks Inc., Natick:MA; 2010
26. SAS Insitute Inc. The SAS System, release 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary:NC; 2008.
27. Kroll CD, Bérzin F, Alves MC. Avaliação clínica da atividade dos músculos mastigatórios durante a mastigação habitual – um estudo sobre a normalização de dados eletromiográficos. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2010; 39: 157-62.
28. Ingerval B, Ridell A, Thilander B. Changes in activity of the temporal, masseter and lip muscles after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. Int J Oral Surg. 1979; 8: 290-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(79)80051-4
29. Kobayashi T, Honma K, Shingaki S, Nakajima T. Changes in masticatory function after orthognathic treatment in patients with mandibular prognathism. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 39: 260-5. PMid:11437420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/bjom.2000.0576
30. Sforza C, Peretta R, Grandi G, Ferronato G, Ferrario VF. Soft tissue facial planes and masticatory muscle function in skeletal Class III patients before and after orthognathic surgery treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 66: 691-8. PMid:18355592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.645
31. Di Palma E, Gasparini G, Pelo S, Tartaglia GM, Chimenti C. Activities of masticatory muscles in patients after orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009; 37: 417-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2009.05.004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2009.05.004
32. Takahiro M, Noboyuki I, Mari Y, Ogawa H, Okuda T, Miyauchi S, et al. Influence of abnormal occlusion in the analysis of chewing movement Part 2: Relation between analysis of chewing movement and abnormality of occlusion. Proceeding of Japanese Soc of Stomatognathic Function. 1989; 7:31-44.
33. Moss JP, Chalmers CP. An electromyographic investigation of patients with a normal jaw relationship and a Class III jaw relationship. Am J Orthod. 1974; 66: 538-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90113-4
34. Miralles R, Hevia R, Contreras L, Carjaval R, Bull R, Manns. A pattern of electromyographic activity in subjects with different skeletal facial types. Angle Orthod. 1991; 61: 277-84. PMid:1763838.
35. Ueki K, Marukawa K, Shimada M, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto E, Nizawa S. Changes in the chewing path of patients in skeletal Class III with and without asymmetry before and after orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63:442-8. PMid:15789314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.06.059
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email