Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
https://revodontolunesp.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/1807-2577.20260018
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Original Article

Do patients understand wisdom teeth post-op care? A double-blind clinical trial

Pacientes entendem cuidados pós-operatórios de terceiros molares? Estudo clínico duplo cego

Leonardo Perazza SILVA; Melissa Koto MURAI; Tiburtino José de LIMA NETO; Willian Phillip Pereira da SILVA; Anderson Maikon de Souza SANTOS; Fábio Ricardo Loureiro SATO; Osvaldo MAGRO FILHO; Leonardo Perez FAVERANI

Downloads: 0
Views: 15

Abstract

Introduction: Effective communication of postoperative instructions is a fundamental pillar for successful surgical recovery. However, information retention and patient comprehension regarding care remain significant challenges in clinical dental practice, potentially impacting treatment outcomes directly.

Objective: To assess patient comprehension of postoperative care following third molar extraction by comparing the effectiveness of three different instruction delivery methods.

Material and method: A study was conducted with 40 patients (21 females, 19 males; mean age 24.38 years) undergoing third molar surgeries. Participants were assigned to three groups: Group A (verbal instructions for postoperative and complementary care), Group B (verbal and written postoperative instructions + verbal complementary care), and Group C (verbal and written instructions for both). Comprehension was evaluated using a structured questionnaire administered with interviewer assistance.

Result: While overall understanding was similar across groups, Group C demonstrated significantly superior adherence to the ‘avoid spitting’ instruction (p = 0.025). Critical errors were identified regarding treatment duration (20% incorrect), antibiotic dosing intervals (35% incorrect), and anti-inflammatory use (62.5% incorrect). Only 7.5% of patients correctly understood trismus mitigation strategies.

Conclusion: These findings highlight severe gaps in information retention, particularly concerning medication regimens and the management of common sequelae. Optimized instructional strategies, combining verbal and written formats, are essential to enhance patient safety and improve clinical outcomes.

Keywords

Oral surgical procedures; dentists; postoperative complications; postoperative care; tooth extraction

Resumo

Introdução: A comunicação eficaz de instruções pós-operatórias é um pilar fundamental para a recuperação cirúrgica favorável. No entanto, a retenção de informações e a compreensão dos cuidados por parte do paciente permanecem como desafios significativos na prática clínica odontológica, podendo impactar diretamente o desfecho do tratamento.

Objetivo: Avaliar o entendimento de pacientes sobre os cuidados pós-operatórios após a exodontia de terceiros molares, comparando a eficácia de três diferentes métodos de entrega de instruções.

Material e método: Estudo realizado com 40 pacientes (21 mulheres, 19 homens; média de 24,38 anos) submetidos a cirurgias de terceiros molares. Os participantes foram divididos em três grupos: Grupo A (instruções verbais para cuidados pós-operatórios e complementares), Grupo B (instruções verbais e escritas para o pós-operatório e apenas verbais para cuidados complementares) e Grupo C (instruções verbais e escritas para ambos). A compreensão foi avaliada por meio de um questionário estruturado aplicado com auxílio de um entrevistador.

Resultado: Embora a compreensão global tenha sido similar entre os grupos, o Grupo C demonstrou adesão significativamente superior à orientação de 'não cuspir' (p = 0,025). Erros críticos foram identificados na duração do tratamento (20% de incorreção), intervalos entre doses de antibióticos (35% de incorreção) e uso de anti-inflamatórios (62,5% de incorreção). Apenas 7,5% dos pacientes compreenderam corretamente as medidas de mitigação do trismo.

Conclusão: Os achados evidenciam falhas severas na retenção de informações, particularmente quanto ao regime medicamentoso e manejo de sequelas comuns. Estratégias de instrução otimizadas, combinando suportes verbais e escritos, são fundamentais para aumentar a segurança do paciente e melhorar os resultados clínicos.

Palavras-chave

Procedimentos cirúrgicos bucais; odontólogos; complicações pós-operatórias; cuidados pós-operatórios; extração dentária

References

1 Alvira-González J, Gay-Escoda C. Compliance of postoperative instructions following the surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars: a randomized clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 Mar;20(2):e224-30. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20121. PMid:25475774.

2 Ghaeminia H, Hoppenreijs TJ, Xi T, Fennis JP, Maal TJ, Bergé SJ, et al. Postoperative socket irrigation with drinking tap water reduces the risk of inflammatory complications following surgical removal of third molars: a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jan;21(1):71-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1751-1. PMid:26922634.

3 Colorado-Bonnin M, Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Quality of life following lower third molar removal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Apr;35(4):343-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2005.08.008. PMid:16280233.

4 Sittitavornwong S, Waite PD, Holmes JD, Klapow JC. The necessity of routine clinic follow-up visits after third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Sep;63(9):1278-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.292. PMid:16122590.

5 Atchison KA, Black EE, Leathers R, Belin TR, Abrego M, Gironda MW, et al. A qualitative report of patient problems and postoperative instructions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Apr;63(4):449-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.07.019. PMid:15789315.

6 Chaves AC Jr, Pereira ACL, Fronsa BR, Oliveira HTR, Chagas OL Jr, Silva TSN. Técnica cirúrgica para remoção dos terceiros molares inferiores e a classificação de Pell-Gregory: um estudo relacional. Rev Cir Traumatol Buco-Maxilo-Fac. 2006 Out-Dez;6(4):65-72.

7 Seguro D, Oliveira RV. Complicações pós-cirúrgicas na remoção de terceiros molares inclusos. Uningá Rev. [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2026 Apr 22];20(1):30-4. Available from: https://revista.uninga.br/uningareviews/article/view/1572

8 Martins M, Garcia MAPY, Fernandes MV, Reis EMF, Vilela RR, Azevedo TS, et al. Principais complicações clínicas odontológicas pós-operatórias da cirurgia de terceiro molar incluso/impactado. ConScientiae Saúde. 2010;9(2):278-84. https://doi.org/10.5585/conssaude.v9i2.2056.

9 Culbertson VL, Arthur TG, Rhodes PJ, Rhodes RS. Consumer preferences for verbal and written medication information. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1988 May;22(5):390-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/106002808802200505. PMid:3391109.

10 Gheisari R, Resalati F, Mahmoudi S, Golkari A, Mosaddad SA. Do different modes of delivering postoperative instructions to patients help reduce the side effects of tooth extraction? A randomized clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug;76(8):1652.e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.04.019. PMid:29758175.

11 Moura WL, Moura WL, Freire SASR, Valentini R No, Mendes SM. Eficácia da antibioticoprofilaxia nas cirurgias de terceiros molares: avaliação morfométrica. Rev CirTtraumatol Buco-Maxilo-Fac. 2011 Abr-Jun;11(2):83-90.

12 Bortoluzzi MC, Manfro R, De Déa BE, Dutra TC. Incidence of dry socket, alveolar infection, and postoperative pain following the extraction of erupted teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2010 Jan;11(1):E033-040. https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-11-1-33. PMid:20098964.

13 Menon RK, Kar Yan L, Gopinath D, Botelho MG. Is there a need for postoperative antibiotics after third molar surgery? A 5-year retrospective study. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019 Nov;10(4):e12460. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12460. PMid:31608608.

14 Sayed N, Bakathir A, Pasha M, Al-Sudairy S. Complications of third molar extraction: a retrospective study from a tertiary healthcare centre in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2019 Aug;19(3):e230-5. https://doi.org/10.18295/squmj.2019.19.03.009. PMid:31728221.

15 Blondeau F, Daniel NG. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007 May;73(4):325. PMid:17484797.

16 Cho H, Lynham AJ, Hsu E. Postoperative interventions to reduce inflammatory complications after third molar surgery: review of the current evidence. Aust Dent J. 2017 Dec;62(4):412-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12526. PMid:28498604.

17 Morrow AJ, Dodson TB, Gonzalez ML, Chuang SK, Lang MS. Do postoperative antibiotics decrease the frequency of inflammatory complications following third molar removal? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr;76(4):700-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.12.001. PMid:29294351.

18 Ramos E, Santamaría J, Santamaría G, Barbier L, Arteagoitia I. Do systemic antibiotics prevent dry socket and infection after third molar extraction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016 Oct;122(4):403-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.04.016. PMid:27499028.

19 Chitturi S, George J. Hepatotoxicity of commonly used drugs: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antihypertensives, antidiabetic agents, anticonvulsants, lipid-lowering agents, psychotropic drugs. Semin Liver Dis. 2002;22(2):169-83. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-30102. PMid:12016548.

20 Bessone F. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: what is the actual risk of liver damage? World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec;16(45):5651-61. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i45.5651. PMid:21128314.

21 Meunier L, Larrey D. Recent advances in hepatotoxicity of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Ann Hepatol. 2018 Mar;17(2):187-91. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.8633. PMid:29469052.

22 Goodchild JH, Donaldson M. Acetaminophen: is too much of a good thing too much? Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2022 May;43(5):268-73. PMid:35589145.

23 Singh Gill A, Morrissey H, Rahman A. A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating antibiotic prophylaxis in dental implants and extraction procedures. Medicina. 2018 Dec;54(6):95. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina54060095. PMid:30513764.

24 Vallerand WP, Vallerand AH, Heft M. The effects of postoperative preparatory information on the clinical course following third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Nov;52(11):1165-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(94)90536-3. PMid:7965311.

25 Reyes-Gilabert E, Luque-Romero LG, Bejarano-Avila G, Garcia-Palma A, Rollon-Mayordomo A, Infante-Cossio P. Assessment of pre and postoperative anxiety in patients undergoing ambulatory oral surgery in primary care. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017 Nov;22(6):e716-22. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21929. PMid:29053655.

26 Torres-Lagares D, Recio-Lora C, Castillo-Dalí G, Ruiz-de-León-Hernández G, Hita-Iglesias P, Serrera-Figallo MA, et al. Influence of state anxiety and trate anxiety in postoperative in oral surgery. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014 Jul;19(4):e403-8. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19604. PMid:24608206.

27 González-Martínez R, Jovani-Sancho MD, Cortell-Ballester I. Does psychological profile influence third molar extraction and postoperative pain? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Mar;75(3):484-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.09.023. PMid:27765547.

28 Garcia Garcia A, Gude Sampedro F, Gandara Rey J, Gallas Torreira M. Trismus and pain after removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Nov;55(11):1223-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90172-5. PMid:9371111.

29 Flores JA, Machado E, Machado P, Flores FW, Mezomo MB. Avaliação da prevalência de trismo em pacientes submetidos à exodontia de terceiros molares. RGO. 2007 Jan-Mar;55(1):17-22.
 


Submitted date:
04/22/2026

Accepted date:
06/16/2026

6a85eddaa95395443b7ca5f5 rou Articles
Links & Downloads

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Share this page
Page Sections