Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
https://revodontolunesp.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/1807-2577.20250011
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Original Article

Ethical guidelines in scientific journal policies: analysis and recommendations

Diretrizes éticas nas políticas de periódicos científicos: análise e recomendações

Catarina Pereira Monteiro LIMA; Larissa Braz PONTES; François Isnaldo Dias CALDEIRA; Luan Viana FARIA; Fernando Afonso de OLIVEIRA; Luana Raphael da SILVA; Maurício Gandini Gianni MARTELLI; Clemente Maia da Silva FERNANDES; Mônica da Costa SERRA

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.20250011 Rev. odontol. UNESP, vol.54, e20250011, 2025
PDF
Downloads: 0
Views: 31

Abstract

Introduction: The growth of online scientific publications has expanded the dissemination of knowledge but has also fostered the emergence of predatory journals that disregard ethical principles of publishing.

Objective: This study examined ethical requirements in health science journals using “Submission Guidelines” from journal websites.

Material and method: A sample of 270 journals was randomly selected from 2,523 identified via the Qualis portal, distributed across Dentistry (15.9%), Health Sciences (53.7%), and multidisciplinary areas (30.4%).

Result: Findings revealed a decline in ethical submission standards with decreasing impact factor and Qualis classification.

Conclusion: Higher-impact journals emphasized robust methodologies, ethical adherence, and reliable results, contrasting with lower-impact journals, which showed less stringent policies. These trends also applied to multidisciplinary journals.

Keywords

Ethics in scientific publication; journals; guidelines

Resumo

Introdução: O crescimento das publicações científicas online ampliou a disseminação do conhecimento, porém também favoreceu o surgimento de revistas predatórias que desconsideram princípios éticos de publicação.

Material e método: Uma amostra de 270 periódicos foi selecionada aleatoriamente a partir de 2.523 identificados no portal Qualis, distribuídos entre Odontologia (15,9%), Ciências da Saúde (53,7%) e áreas multidisciplinares (30,4%).

Resultado: Os achados revelaram uma queda nos padrões éticos de submissão à medida que o fator de impacto e a classificação Qualis diminuíam.

Conclusão: Periódicos de maior impacto enfatizavam metodologias robustas, adesão ética e resultados confiáveis, enquanto periódicos de menor impacto apresentavam políticas menos rigorosas. Essas tendências também se aplicaram a periódicos multidisciplinares.

Palavras-chave

Ética na publicação científica; periódicos; diretrizes

References

1 Oermann MH, Nicoll LH, Chinn PL, Ashton KS, Conklin JL, Edie AH, et al. Quality of articles published in predatory nursing journals. Nurs Outlook. 2018 Jan-Feb;66(1):4-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.05.005. PMid:28641868.

2 Yan JR, Baldawi H, Lex JR, Simchovich G, Baisi LP, Bozzo A, et al. Predatory publishing in orthopaedic research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov;100(21):e138. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01569. PMid:30399085.

3 Ball S, Kopel J, Alexander R, Nugent K. Solicitation for article submission by electronic journals. Proc Bayl Univ Med Cent. 2018 Sep;31(4):443-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2018.1498725. PMid:30948976.

4 Graf C, Wager E, Bowman A, Fiack S, Scott-Lichter D, Robinson A. Best practice guidelines on publication ethics: a publisher’s perspective. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2007 Jan;61(152):1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01230.x. PMid:17206953.

5 Beall J. What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochem Med. 2017 Jun;27(2):273-8. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.029. PMid:28694718.

6 Sharma H, Verma S. Predatory journals: the rise of worthless biomedical science. J Postgrad Med. 2018 Oct-Dec;64(4):226-31. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_347_18. PMid:30306968.

7 Taylor GA. Predatory journals: a different pandemic. Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Apr;51(4):516-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04918-4. PMid:33404785.

8 Sullivan LS. Motivated reasoning and research ethics guidelines. J Appl Philos. 2022 Jul;39(3):519-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12577.

9 Isaacs D, Elliot C, Kilham H, Preisz A. The ethics of publishing in medical journals. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2021 Sep;39:41-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2019.04.005. PMid:31678037.

10 Strong G. Understanding quality in research: avoiding predatory journals. J Hum Lact. 2019 Nov;35(4):661-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419869912. PMid:31491365.

11 Brasil. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – CAPES. The 2017–2020 CAPES Classification. Brasília: CAPES; 2023 [cited 2025 May 14]. Available at: https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/index.jsf

12 Journal Citation Reports. Zendesk. 2024 [cited 2025 Apr 30]. Available from: https://jcr.clarivate.com/jcr/browse-journals

13 World Medical Association – WMA. Declaration of Helsinki 2008. WMA; 2008 [cited 2025 Jan 30]. Available from: https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/doh-oct2008/

14 European Medicines Agency. EU Clinical Trials Register. The Netherlands: European Medicines Agency. 2025 [cited 2025 Jan 30]. Available from: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu

15 ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical Trials. Bethesda: National Library of Medicine; 2025 [cited 2025 Jan 30]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov

16 ISRCTN. The Uk’s Clinical Study Registry. ISRCTN; 2025 [cited 2025 Jan 30]. Available from: https://www.isrctn.com

17 Equator Network. Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research; 2023[cited 2025 Jan 30]. Available from: https://www.equator-network.org/

18 Bealls list. Potential Predatory scholarly open-acess publishers. Bealls list; 2021 [cited 2025 Jan 30] Available from: https://beallslist.net/

19 Ruy Carneiro NC, Vieira Prado H, Duda Deps Almeida T, Almeida Pordeus I, Borges-Oliveira AC, Castro Martins C. A survey of dental journal methodological practices: reporting guidelines and ethical policies. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 Dec;149(12):1057-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2018.08.008. PMid:30244866.

20 Malički M, Jerončić A, Aalbersberg IJ, Bouter L, Ter Riet G. Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017. Nat Commun. 2021 Oct;12(1):5840. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26027-y. PMid:34611157.

21 Teixeira RK, Yamaki VN, Gonçalves TB, Botelho NM, Silva JA. O fator de impacto influencia na ética das instruções aos autores de uma revista? Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2013 May-Jun;59(3):280-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ramb.2012.12.003. PMid:23680270.

22 Fontanarosa PB, Flanagin A, DeAngelis CD. Reporting conflicts of interest, financial aspects of research, and role of sponsors in funded studies. JAMA. 2005 Jul;294(1):110-1. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.1.110. PMid:15998899.

23 Mugnaini R, Igami MPZ, Krzyzanowski RF. Acesso aberto e financiamento da pesquisa no Brasil: características e tendências da produção científica. Encontros Bibli. 2022;27(1):1-26. https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2022.e78818.

24 Cooper CM, Gray H, Barcenas L, Torgerson T, Checketts JX, Vassar M. An evaluation of reporting guidelines and clinical trial registry requirements among addiction medicine journals. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2020 Dec;120(12):823-30. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2020.148. PMid:33075122.

25 Sims MT, Checketts JX, Wayant C, Vassar M. Requirements for trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines in critical care journals: a meta-epidemiological study of journals’ instructions for authors. Int J Evid-Based Healthc. 2018 Mar;16(1):55-65. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000120. PMid:28863029.

26 Han MA, Kim SJ, Hwang EC, Jung JH. The status quo of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals in Korea: a study focused on protocol registration and GRADE use. Epidemiol Health. 2022;44:e2022108. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2022108. PMid:36397240.

27 Bazi T. Peer review: single-blind, double-blind, or all the way-blind? Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Mar;31(3):481-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04187-2. PMid:31820012.

28 Serra MC, Penteado VP, Barbosa ACS, Fernandes CMS. Research integrity and scientific misconduct: international guidelines, national standards and cooperative research. Ethical and legal reflections. Res Soc Dev. 2021;10(9):e46110918219. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i9.18219.

29 Beltrão JF, Silva TC, Silva NLL. Análise das políticas de plágio na publicação científica: o caso de um segmento de revistas da área de Ciências Humanas na América Latina. Transinformacao. 2022;34:e220018. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889202234e220018.

30 Resnik DB, Tyler AM, Black JR, Kissling G. Authorship policies of scientific journals. J Med Ethics. 2016 Mar;42(3):199-202. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-103171. PMid:26714812.

31 Wager E. Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship? MedGenMed. 2007 Jul;9(3):16. PMid:18092023.

32 Gomes WJ, Evora PRB, Guizilini S. Artificial intelligence is irreversibly bound to academic publishing - ChatGPT is cleared for scientific writing and peer review. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;38(4):e20230963. https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0963. PMid:37797272.

33 Rahimi F, Talebi Bezmin Abadi A. ChatGPT and publication ethics. Arch Med Res. 2023 Apr;54(3):272-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2023.03.004. PMid:36990890.

34 Zielinski C, Winker MA, Aggarwal R, Ferris LE, Heinemann M, Lapeña JF Jr, et al. Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications. Colomb Med. 2023 Sep;54(3):e1015868. https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v54i3.5868. PMid:38089825.

35 Patel RB, Vaduganathan M, Mosarla RC, Venkateswaran RV, Bhatt DL, Bonow RO. Open access publishing and subsequent citations among articles in major cardiovascular journals. Am J Med. 2019 Sep;132(9):1103-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.02.009. PMid:30851265.

36 Ferris LE, Winker MA. Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals. Biochem Med. 2017 Jun;27(2):279-84. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.030. PMid:28694719.

37 Manca A, Martinez G, Cugusi L, Dragone D, Mercuro G, Deriu F. Predatory open access in rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May;98(5):1051-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.002. PMid:28115073.

38 Shen C, Björk BC. ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Med. 2015 Oct;13(1):230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2. PMid:26423063.
 

Submitted date:
05/14/2025

Accepted date:
08/25/2025

69380652a95395610852310a rou Articles
Links & Downloads
1807-2577 (Electronic)
Rev. odontol. UNESP ©2025 All rights reserved.

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Share this page
Page Sections