Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
https://revodontolunesp.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/1807-2577.14815
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Original Article

Relining effects on the push-out shear bond strength of glass fiber posts

Efeitos do reembasamento sobre a resistência ao cisalhamento por extrusão (push-out) de pinos de fibra de vidro

Andrioli, Adriana Rosado Valente; Coutinho, Margareth; Vasconcellos, Andréa Araújo de; Miranda, Milton Edson

Downloads: 0
Views: 1057

Abstract

Introduction: The correct use of glass fiber posts in endodontically treated teeth is essential for the clinical success of restorative treatment. Objective: This study evaluated the push-out shear bond strength of relined (R) or non-relined (NR) glass fiber posts, cemented with self-adhesive resin cement [RelyXTM U100 (U100)] and conventional resin cement [RelyXTM ARC (ARC)]. Material and method: Sixty human single-rooted teeth were endodontically treated and divided into ARC-NR; U100-NR; ARC-R; U100-R groups. The teeth were sectioned into cervical, middle and apical thirds, and subjected to the push-out test. Bond strength was analyzed by the Friedman test; cement and post types were compared by the Mann Whitney test. The pattern of failures was evaluated with digital camera through images at 200x magnification, and was classified as adhesive (at the cement/dentin or cement/post interface), cohesive (cement or post), and mixed failures. Result: In ARC-NR, bond strength values were higher in the cervical third; in U100-NR and ARC-R they were similar between the thirds. In U100-R, in the cervical and middle thirds the bond strength values were similar, and there was lower value in the apical third. For non-relined glass fiber posts, the highest mean bond strength values were observed with self-adhesive resin cement. Whereas, relined posts cemented with conventional resin cement had stronger cement layer in comparison with non-relined fiber posts. Conclusion: The post relining technique was efficient in ARC-R. ARC-NR and U100-R showed improved bond strength in the cervical region of canal walls. The main failures were adhesive at the cement-post interface.

Keywords

Dental bonding, dental materials, dentin, post and core technique, shear strength.

Resumo

Introdução: O correto uso de pinos de fibra de vidro em dentes tratados endodonticamente é essencial para o sucesso clínico do tratamento restaurador. Objetivo: Esse estudo avaliou a resistência ao cisalhamento por extrusão (push-out) em pinos de fibra de vidro reembasados (R) ou não reembasados (NR), cimentados com cimento resinoso auto-adesivo [RelyXTM U100 (U100)] e cimento resinoso convencional [RelyXTM ARC (ARC)]. Material e método: Sessenta dentes humanos unirradiculares foram tratados endodonticamente e divididos nos grupos ARC-NR; U100-NR; ARC-R; U100-R. Os dentes foram seccionados nos terços cervical, médio e apical para serem submetidos ao teste de cisalhamento por extrusão (push-out). A resistência de união foi analisada pelo teste de Friedman; os tipos de cimento e de pinos foram comparados pelo teste de Mann Whitney. O padrão de falhas foi avaliado com câmera digital através de imagens em 200x de ampliação e foi classificado como falhas adesivas (na interface cimento/dentina ou cimento/pino), coesivas (cimento ou pino), e mistas. Resultado: No grupo ARC-NR, os valores de resistência de união foram maiores no terço cervical; os grupos U100-NR e ARC-R foram semelhantes entre os terços. No grupo U100-R, os valores de resistência de união foram semelhantes nos terços cervical e médio, e houve menor valor no terço apical. Para pinos de fibra de vidro não reembasados, a média mais alta dos valores de resistência de união foi com cimento resinoso auto-adesivo. Considera-se ainda que os pinos reembasados com cimento resinoso convencional tiveram camada de cimento mais forte em comparação com os pinos de fibra não reembasados. Conclusão: A técnica do pino reembasado foi eficiente no grupo ARC-R. Os grupos ARC-NR e U100-R mostraram melhor resistência de união na região cervical das paredes do canal radicular. As principais falhas foram adesivas na interface cimento-pino.

Palavras-chave

Colagem dentária, materiais dentários, dentina, técnica para retentor intrarradicular, resistência ao cisalhamento.

References

1. Lamichhane A, Xu C, Zhang F-Q. Dental fiber-post resin base material: a review. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014 Feb;6(1):60-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.60. PMid:24605208.

2. Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Aust Dent J. 2011 Jun;56(Suppl 1):77-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01298.x. PMid:21564118.

3. Suzuki TY, Gomes-Filho JE, Gallego J, Pavan S, Dos Santos PH, Fraga Briso AL. Mechanical properties of components of the bonding interface in different regions of radicular dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jan;113(1):54-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.07.009. PMid:25277035.

4. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjör IA. Bonding to root canal: structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent. 2000 Oct;13(5):255-60. PMid:11764112.

5. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater. 2003 May;19(3):199-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00030-1. PMid:12628431.

6. Toman M, Toksavul S, Sarıkanat M, Firidinoglu K, Akın A. The evaluation of displacement resistance of glass FRC posts to root dentine using a thin slice push-out test. Int Endod J. 2009 Sep;42(9):802-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01586.x. PMid:19548933.

7. Goracci C, Fabianelli A, Sadek F, Papacchini F, Tay F, Ferrari M. The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J Endod. 2005 Aug;31(8):608-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000153841.23594.91. PMid:16044046.

8. Pirani C, Chersoni S, Foschi F, Piana G, Loushine RJ, Tay FR, et al. Does hybridization of intraradicular dentin really improve fiber post retention in endodontically treated teeth? J Endod. 2005 Dec;31(12):891-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000164853.92310.e7. PMid:16306825.

9. Perez BE, Barbosa SH, Melo RM, Zamboni SC, Özcan M, Valandro LF, et al. Does the thickness of the resin cement affect the bond strength of a fiber post to the root dentin? Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Nov-Dec;19(6):606-9. PMid:17165301.

10. Grandini A, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Borracchini A, Ferrari M. SEM evaluation of the cement layer thickness after luting two different posts. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7(3):235-40. PMid:16240965.

11. D’Arcangelo C, D’Amario M, De Angelis F, Zazzeroni S, Vadini M, Caputi S. Effect of application technique of luting agent on the retention of three types of fiber-reinforced post systems. J Endod. 2007 Nov;33(11):1378-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.07.027. PMid:17963968.

12. Grandini S, Sapio S, Simonetti M. Use of anatomic post and core for reconstructing an endodontically treated tooth: a case report. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5(3):243-7. PMid:14621246.

13. Faria-e-Silva AL, Pedrosa-Filho CF, Menezes MS, Silveira DM, Martins LRM. Effect of relining on fiber post retention to root canal. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 Nov-Dec;17(6):600-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000600012. PMid:20027434.

14. Macedo VC, Faria e Silva AL, Marcondes Martins LR. Effect of cement type, relining procedure, and length of cementation on pull-out bond strength of fiber posts. J Endod. 2010 Sep;36(9):1543-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.014. PMid:20728724.

15. Kadam A, Pujar M, Patil C. Evaluation of push-out bond strength of two fiber-reinforced composite posts systems using two luting cements in vitro. J Conserv Dent. 2013 Sep;16(5):444-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.117522. PMid:24082575.

16. Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesive resin cements- chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Apr;38(4):295-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02148.x. PMid:21133983.

17. Al-Assaf K, Chakmakchi M, Palaghias G, Karanika-Kouma A, Eliades G. Interfacial characteristics of adhesive luting resins and composites with dentine. Dent Mater. 2007 Jul;23(7):829-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.023. PMid:16934865.

18. Silva RAT, Coutinho M, Cardozo PI, Silva LA, Zorzatto JR. Conventional dual-cure versus self-adhesive resin cements in dentin bond integrity. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Aug;19(4):355-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011005000010. PMid:21710099.

19. Santos V, Perdigão J, Gomes G, Silva AL. Sealing ability of three fiber dowel systems. J Prosthodont. 2009 Oct;18(7):566-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00482.x. PMid:19515165.

20. Huang C, Kei LH, Wei SH, Cheung GS, Tay FR, Pashley DH. The influence of hygroscopic expansion of resin-based restorative materials on artificial gap reduction. J Adhes Dent. 2002;4(1):61-71. PMid:12071630.

21. Gerth HU, Dammaschke T, Züchner H, Schäfer E. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites: a comparative study. Dent Mater. 2006 Oct;22(10):934-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.004. PMid:16364427.

22. Dauvillier BS, Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Visco-elastic parameters of dental restorative materials during setting. J Dent Res. 2000 Mar;79(3):818-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790030601. PMid:10765954.

23. Calixto LR, Bandéca MC, Clavijo V, Andrade MF, Vaz LG, Campos EA. Effect of resin cement system and root region on the push-out bond strength of a translucent fiber post. Oper Dent. 2012 Jan-Feb;37(1):80-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/11-035-L. PMid:21942240.

24. Topcu FT, Erdemir U, Sahinkesen G, Mumcu E, Yildiz E, Uslan I. Push-out bond strengths of two fiber post types bonded with different dentin bonding agents. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010 May;93(2):359-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31590. PMid:20091920.

25. Reginato CF, Oliveira AS, Kaizer MR, Jardim OS, Moraes RR. Polymerization efficiency through translucent and opaque fiber posts and bonding to root dentin. J Prosthodont Res. 2013 Jan;57(1):20-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2012.05.003. PMid:23116926.

26. Goracci C, Corciolani G, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Light-transmitting Ability of Marketed Fiber Posts. J Dent Res. 2008 Dec;87(12):1122-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154405910808701208. PMid:19029079.

27. Muniz L, Mathias P. The influence of sodium hypochlorite and root canal sealers on post retention in different dentin regions. Oper Dent. 2005 Jul-Aug;30(4):533-9. PMid:16130876.

28. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambil JP, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. Int Endod J. 2006 Oct;39(10):809-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01155.x. PMid:16948667.

588019e57f8c9d0a098b53b1 rou Articles
Links & Downloads

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Share this page
Page Sections