Estudo in vitro e in vivo de sondas periodontais do tipo Williams disponíveis no mercado brasileiro
In vitro and in vivo study of Williams-type periodontal probes available in the Brazilian market
Isabella Soares de Oliveira MATOS; Tainá Mara CARREIRA; Eliane Marçon BARROSO; Gabriela Alessandra da Cruz Galhardo CAMARGO; Alessandra Areas e SOUZA; Elizangela Cruvinel ZUZA
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Abstract:
Keywords
References
1 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. SB Brasil 2010: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde Bucal: resultados principais. Brasília; 2011.
2 Eke PI, Dye BA, Wei L, Slade GD, Thornton-Evans GO, Borgnakke WS, et al. Update on Prevalence of Periodontitis in adults in the United States: NHANES 2009 to 2012. J Periodontol. 2015 May;86(5):611-22.
3 Loe H, Theilade E, Jensen SB. Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol. 1965 May-Jun;36(3):177-87.
4 Armitage GC. The complete periodontal examination. Periodontol 2000. 2004;34(1):22-33.
5 Chapple ILC, Mealey BL, Van Dyke TE, Bartold PM, Dommisch H, Eickholz P, et al. Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45(Suppl 20):S68-77.
6 Andrade R, Espinoza M, Gómez EM, Rolando Espinoza J, Cruz E. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of manual probing depth. Braz Oral Res. 2012 Jan-Feb;26(1):57-63.
7 Magalhães D, Campoli MAO, Teixeira CPR. Avaliação da precisão de sondagem periodontal. ROBRAC. 1993;3(7):4-6.
8 Cesar JB No, Nogueira GR Fo, Tramontina VA, Sallum EA, Nociti FH Jr, Sallum AW. Millimeter marks and probe tip diameter standardisation from commercially available periodontal probes: a comparative study. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2001 Jul;3(3):57-60. PMid:12666942.
9 Rocha EF, Campanelli V, Crivelenti LAM, Joaquim AMC. Variability of the probing depth between conventional and controlled-force periodontal probes. Rev Salusvita. 2003;22(2):219-27.
10 Pinto FM, Gusmão ES, Souza EHA, Silveira RCJ. Sondagem clínica do sulco gengival: avaliação da sua variabilidade e reprodutibilidade. RGO (Porto Alegre). 2006 Jan-Mar;54(1):39-42.
11 Penteado LAM, Awabdi TWM, Auto VC, Rodrigues EDO, Oliveira DP, Santos NB. Avaliação da padronização das sondas periodontals utilizadas em uma instituição de ensino superior de Maceió-AL. Int J Dent. 2010;9(3):120-7.
12 Tahim CM, Barbosa CS, Mota OML, Pereira SLS, Lima DLF, Carlos MX. Avaliação da padronização de sondas periodontais tipo Williams. Revista Periodontia. 2007 Set;17(3):86-9.
13 López NJ, Smith PC, Gutierrez J. Periodontal therapy may reduce the risk of preterm low birth weight in women with peridotal disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2002 Aug;73(8):911-24.
14 Barendregt DS, Van Der Velden U, Timmerman MF, Van Der Weijden GA. Comparison of two automated periodontal probes and two probes with a conventional readout in periodontal maintenance patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2006 Apr;33(4):276-82.
15 Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J. 1975 Dec;25(4):229-35. PMid:1058834.
16 Research, Science and Therapy Committee. Position paper: diagnosis of periodontal diseases. J Periodontol. 2003 Aug;74(8):1237-47.
17 Highfield J. Diagnosis and classification of periodontal disease. Aust Dent J. 2009 Sep;54(Suppl 1):S11-26.
18 Bulthuis HM, Barendregt DS, Timmerman MF, Loos BG, Van Der Velden U. Probe penetration in relation to the connective tissue attachment level: Influence of tine shape and probing force. J Clin Periodontol. 1998 May;25(5):417-23.
19 Costa FO, Guimarães AN, Cota LOM, Pataro AL, Segundo TK, Cortelli SC, et al. Impact of different periodontitis case definitions on periodontal research. J Oral Sci. 2009 Jun;51(2):199-206.
Submitted date:
10/31/2020
Accepted date:
11/18/2020
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email