Skeletal changes produced by cervical and parietal headgears: a cephalometric evaluation
Avaliação cefalométrica das alterações esqueléticas decorrentes do uso do aparelho extrabucal com ancoragens cervical e parietal
Anderson Jaña ROSA; Oswaldo de Vasconcellos VILELLA
Abstract
Keywords
Resumo
Resumo:
Palavras-chave
References
1 Angle EH. Classification of malocclusion. Dental Cosmos. 1899 Mar;41(3):248-64.
2 Farret MM, Lima EM, Araújo VP, Rizzatto SMD, Menezes LM, Grossi ML. Molar changes with cervical headgear alone or in combination with rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod. 2008 Sep;78(5):847-51.
3 Henriques FP, Janson G, Henriques JFC, Pupulim DC. Effects of cervical headgear appliance: a systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Jul-Aug;20(4):76-81.
4 Kirjavainen M, Hurmerinta K, Kirjavainen T. Facial profile changes in early class II correction with cervical headgear. Angle Orthod. 2007 Nov;77(6):960-7.
5 Baptista AA, Galindo AGS, Pinheiro CC, Motta AFJ, Vilella OV, Mucha JN. A prevalência de maloclusões em escolares de Niterói – 1ª parte. Rev Flumin Odontol. 1997;6(1):12-6.
6 Freitas MR, Freitas DS, Pinheiro FHSL, Freitas KMS. Prevalência das más oclusões em pacientes inscritos para tratamento ortodôntico na Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru. Rev Fac Odontol Bauru. 2002;10(3):164-9.
7 Nanda RS. The contributions of craniofacial growth to clinical orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 May;117(5):553-5.
8 Maruo IT, Maruo H, Saga AY, Oliveira DD, Argenta MA, Tanaka OM. Tridimensional finite element analysis of teeth movement induced by different headgear forces. Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):18.
9 Phan XL, Schneider BJ, Sadowsky C, BeGole EA. Effects of orthodontic treatment on mandibular rotation and displacement in Angle class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2004 Apr;74(2):174-83. PMid:15132443.
10 Piva LM, Brito HHA, Leite HR, O’Reilly M. Effects of cervical headgear and fixed appliances on the space available for maxillary second molars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Sep;128(3):366-71.
11 Wieslander L. The effect of orthodontic treatment on the concurrent development of the craniofacial complex. Am J Orthod. 1963 Jan;49(1):15-27.
12 Barton JJ. High-pull headgear versus cervical traction: a cephalometric comparison. Am J Orthod. 1972 Nov;62(5):517-29.
13 Casaccia GR, Gomes JC, Squeff LR, Penedo ND, Elias CN, Gouvêa JP, et al. Analysis of initial movement of maxillary molars submitted to extraoral forces: a 3D study. Dental Press J Orthod. 2010 Out;15(5):37-9.
14 Ibitayo AO, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger J, Bayirli B. Dentoskeletal effects of functional appliances vs bimaxillary surgery in hyperdivergent class II patients. Angle Orthod. 2011 Mar;81(2):304-11.
15 Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015 May;18(2):86-95.
16 Bilbo EE, Marshall SD, Southard KA, Allareddy V, Holton N, Thames AM, et al. Long term skeletal effects of high-pull headgear followed by fixed appliances for the treatment of class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2018 Sep;88(5):530-7.
17 Tüfekçi E, Allen SB, Best AM, Lindauer SJ. Current trends in headgear use for the treatment of class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2016 Jul;86(4):584-9.
18 Rosa AJ, Nascimento RR, Mucha JN, Vilella OV. Effects of the cervical headgear in growing Angle Class II malocclusion patients: a prospective study. Dental Press J Orthod. 2020 Apr;25(2):25-31.
19 Lima RMA Fo, Lima AL, Ruellas ACO. Mandibular changes in skeletal class II patients treated with Kloehn cervical headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jul;124(1):83-90.
20 Almeida-Pedrin RR, Henriques JFC, Almeida RR, Almeida MR, McNamara JA Jr. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Dec;136(6):833-42.
21 Baccetti T, Franchi L, Stahl F. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jun;135(6):698.e1-10.
22 Lione R, Franchi L, Laganà G, Cozza P. Effects of cervical headgear and pendulum appliance on vertical dimension in growing subjects: a retrospective controlled clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2015 Jun;37(3):338-44.
23 Tamburús VS, Pereira JS No, Siqueira VCV, Tamburús WL. Treatment effects on class II division 1 high angle patients treated according to the bioprogressive therapy (cervical headgear and lower utility arch), with emphasis on vertical control. Dental Press J Orthod. 2011 May-June;16(3):70-8.
24 Oosthuizen L, Dijkman JF, Evans WG. A mechanical appraisal of the Kloehn extraoral assembly. Angle Orthod. 1973 Jul;43(3):221-32. PMid:4515770.
25 Jacobson A. A key to the understanding of extraoral forces. Am J Orthod. 1979 Apr;75(4):361-86.