Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
https://revodontolunesp.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/1807-2577.02020
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Original Article

Different bonding agents effect on adhesive bond strength: lithium disilicate glass ceramic

Efeito de diferentes agentes de união na cimentação adesiva em superfície cerâmica de dissilicato de lítio

Marcos Daniel Septímio LANZA; Walisson Arthuso VASCONCELLOS; Giovani Lana Peixoto de MIRANDA; Rogéli Tibúrcio Ribeiro da Cunha PEIXOTO; Lincoln Dias LANZA

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.02020 Rev. odontol. UNESP, vol.49, e20200020, 2020
PDF
Downloads: 1
Views: 722

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The silanization of the ceramic surface prior to applying the adhesive and/or resinous materials plays an important role in bond strength. Nowadays, a new family of adhesive systems has been introduced into the market, aiming to simplify the technique of adhesive procedures during cementation.

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of different bonding agents containing silane and primer on Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic (LD) surface by shear bond strength tests.

Material and method: 130 LD ceramic blocks were included in acrylic resin, polished and washed in ultrasound for 10 minutes. The specimens were divided into 2 groups according to surface treatment: Polished Surface (PS); Hydrofluoric Acid 9.5% - 20s (HF). Each group was divided into 5 subgroups (n = 13) according to bonding agent type: metallic primer containing MDP (ZPrimePlus, Bisco Inc); two traditional silanes (MonobondPlus, IvoclarVivadent / Porcelain Prime, Bisco Inc.); mixture of silane and resin (Kerr Silane, Kerr); mixture of silane and universal adhesive (Single-bond Universal, 3M Espe). The specimens were mounted in a standard device for shear testing (UltradentBonding Assembly), cemented with dual resin cement (RelyX UltimateTM, 3M Espe.) and photo-polymerized for 20s. The samples were tested after 24 hours and 3 months of storage in distilled water at ±36 °C. The data were analyzed by 3-Way Anova and Tukey's test (α = 5%).

Result: Shear bond strength (SBS) was significantly influenced by surface treatment, bonding agent used and storage (p <0.001).

Conclusion: Adequate adhesive bond strength to Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic can be obtained with traditional silanes, combined with HF acid pretreatment surface.

Keywords

Adhesion, adhesive strength, lithium disilicate glass ceramic, resin cement, silanes

Resumo

Resumo: Introdução: A silanização da superfície cerâmica antes da aplicação do adesivo e/ou materiais resinosos desempenha um papel importante na resistência adesiva. Atualmente, uma nova família de sistemas adesivos foi introduzida no mercado, visando simplificar a técnica dos procedimentos adesivos durante a cimentação.

Objetivo: Investigar a eficácia de diferentes soluções contendo silano e primer na superfície de cerâmicas de Dissilicato de Lítio (DLT) por meio de testes de resistência adesiva por cisalhamento.

Material e método: 130 blocos cerâmicos DLT foram incluídos em resina acrílica, polidos e lavados em ultra-som por 10 minutos. Os espécimes foram divididos em 2 grupos de acordo com tratamento de superfície: Superfície Polida (PS); Ácido Hidro-Fluorídrico 9,5% - 20s (HF). Cada grupo foi dividido em 5 sub-grupos (n = 13) de acordo com o tipo de primer/silano: primer metálico contendo MDP (ZprimePlus, Bisco Inc); dois silanos tradicionais (MonobondPlus, IvoclarVivadent / Porcelain Prime, Bisco Inc.); mistura de silano e resina (Kerr Silane, Kerr); mistura de silano e adesivo universal (Single-bond Universal, 3M Espe). Os espécimes foram montados em um dispositivo padrão (UltradentBonding Assembly) para teste de cisalhamento Bisco Shear Bond Tester), cimentados com cimento resinoso dual (RelyX UltimateTM, 3M Espe.) e foto-polimerizados por 20s. O teste foi realizado após o período de: 24 horas e 3 meses de armazenamento em água destilada à ±36 °C. Os dados foram analisados por 3-Way Anova e Teste de Tukey (α=5%).

Resultado: A resistência adesiva ao cisalhamento (SBS) foi significativamente influenciada pelo tipo de tratamento da superfície, pelo tipo de agente de união utilizado e pelo armazenamento (p<0,001).

Conclusão: Adequada resistência adesiva pode ser obtida com silanos tradicionais, combinados com o pré-tratamento de superfície com ácido HF.
 

Palavras-chave

Adesão, resistência adesiva, dissilicato de lítio, cimento resinoso, silano

References

1 Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J. 2011 Jun;56(Suppl 1):84-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01299.x. PMid:21564119.

2 Guess PC, Zavanelli RA, Silva NRFA, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Thompson VP. Monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate versus veneered Y-TZP crowns: comparison of failure modes and reliability after fatigue. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Sep-Oct;23(5):434-42. PMid:20859559.

3 Raigrodski AJ, Hillstead MB, Meng GK, Chung K-H. Survival and complications of zirconia- based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Mar;107(3):170-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60051-1. PMid:22385693.

4 Alex G. Preparing porcelain surfaces for optimal bonding. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008 Jul-Aug;29(6):324-35, quiz 336. PMid:18795637.

5 Shimakura Y, Hotta Y, Fujishima A, Kunii J, Miyazaki T, Kawawa T. Bonding strength of resin cement to silicate glass ceramics for dental CAD/CAM systems is enhanced by combination treatment of the bonding surface. Dent Mater J. 2007 Sep;26(5):713-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.713. PMid:18203473.

6 Klosa K, Boesch I, Kern M. Long-term bond of glass ceramic and resin cement: evaluation of titanium tetrafluoride as an alternative etching agent for lithium disilicate ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 2013 Aug;15(4):377-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a29381. PMid:23534032.

7 Meng X, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Influence of ceramic thickness on mechanical properties and polymer structure of dual-cured resin luting agents. Dent Mater. 2008 May;24(5):594-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.014. PMid:17669482.

8 Brentel AS, Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Alarça LG, Amaral R, Bottino MA. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldpathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions. Dent Mater. 2007 Nov;23(11):1323-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.011. PMid:17188745.

9 Kitayama S, Nikaido T, Takahashi R, Zhu L, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, et al. Effect of primer treatment on bonding of resin cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater. 2010 May;26(5):426-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.159. PMid:20102781.

10 Kim RJ-Y, Woo J-S, Lee I-B, Yi Y-A, Hwang J-Y, Seo D-G. Performance of universal adhesives on bonding to leucite-reinforced ceramic. Biomater Res. 2015 May;19(1):11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40824-015-0035-1.

11 Research Randomizer [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2007 Mar 27]. Available from: http://www.randomizer.org

12 Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV. Enhanced resin-composite bonding to zirconia framework after pretreatment with selected silane monomers. Dent Mater. 2011 Mar;27(3):273-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.002. PMid:21122907.

13 Kalavacharla VK, Lawson NC, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. Influence of etching protocol and silane treatment with a universal adhesive on lithium disilicate bond strength. Oper Dent. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):372-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/14-116-L. PMid:25535784.

14 Matinlinna JP, Lassila LVJ, Ozcan M, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Mar-Apr;17(2):155-64. PMid:15119865.

15 Hooshmand T, Matinlinna JP, Keshvad A, Eskandarion S, Zamani F. Bond strength of a dental leucite-based glass ceramic to a resin cement using different silane coupling agents. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013 Jan;17:327-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.08.020. PMid:23122713.

16 Loguercio AD, Paula EA, Hass V, Luque-Martinez I, Reis A, Perdigão J. A new universal simplified adhesive: 36-month randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Dent. 2015 Sep;43(9):1083-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.005. PMid:26159382.

17 Lee Y, Kim J-H, Woo J-S, Yi Y-A, Hwang J-Y, Seo D-G. Analysis of self-adhesive resin cement microshear bond strength on leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic with/without pure silane primer or universal adhesive surface treatment. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:361893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/361893. PMid:26557660.

18 Cuevas-Suárez CE, de Oliveira da Rosa WL, Vitti RP, da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding strength of universal adhesives to indirect substrates: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthodont. 2020 Apr;29(4):298-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13147. PMid:31994803.

19 Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Sonoda A, Maruo Y, Makita Y, Okihara T, et al. Effectiveness and stability of silane coupling agent incorporated in ‘universal’ adhesives. Dent Mater. 2016 Oct;32(10):1218-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.07.002. PMid:27461880.

20 Chen L, Shen H, Suh BI. Effect of incorporating BisGMA resin on the bonding properties of silane and zirconia primers. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Nov;110(5):402-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.04.005. PMid:24007793.

21 Makishi P, André CB, Silva JPL, Bacelar-Sá R, Correr-Sobrinho L, Giannini M. Effect of storage time on bond strength performance of multimode adhesives to indirect resin composite and lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Oper Dent. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):541-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/15-187-L. PMid:27379836.

22 Amaral R, Ozcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Resin bonding to a feldspar ceramic after different ceramic surface conditioning methods: evaluation of contact angle, surface pH, and microtensile bond strength durability. J Adhes Dent. 2011 Dec;13(6):551-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a19815. PMid:21246072.

23 Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV. Experimental novel silane system in adhesion promotion between dental resin and pretreated titanium. Part II: effect of long term water storage. Silicon. 2010 Apr;2(2):79-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12633-010-9039-6.

24 Roulet JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res. 1995 Jan;74(1):381-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740011501. PMid:7876433.

25 Tian T, Tsoi JK-H, Matinlinna JP, Burrow MF. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater. 2014 Jul;30(7):e147-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.017. PMid:24612840.

26 Shimada Y, Yamaguchi S, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of dual-cured resin cement to glass ceramics. Dent Mater. 2002 Jul;18(5):380-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00054-9. PMid:12175577.
 

Submitted date:
03/27/2020

Accepted date:
07/06/2020

5f5296df0e8825b4657dc2e4 rou Articles
Links & Downloads
1807-2577 (Electronic)
Rev. odontol. UNESP ©2024 All rights reserved.

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Share this page
Page Sections