Removable partial or complete dentures exposed to beverages and mouthwashes: evaluation of microhardness and roughness
Próteses parciais e totais removíveis expostas a bebidas e enxaguatórios bucais: avaliação da microdureza e rugosidade
Feitosa, Fernanda Alves; Reggiani, Mateus Guimarães Lage; Araújo, Rodrigo Máximo de
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate microhardness and roughness of denture base polymethylmethacrylate resinn exposed to acid beverages and mouthwashes. Material and method: Rectangular samples (n=80) were prepared from poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). They were divided into 8 groups and had the initial microhardness and Knoop roughness measured. Samples of each group were immersed for 10 min into a test solution (coffee, lemon juice, chlorhexidine gluconate, red wine, cola-based soft drink, vinegar or antiseptic with and without alcohol) and after stored in artificial saliva for 23 h and 50 min, completing a period of 24 h. This procedure was performed for 14 consecutive days and after this period the microhardness and surface roughness measurements were made again. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA non parametric, Kruskal-Walis and the Dunn´s test for microhardness and the t-Student and ANOVA for roughness. Result: For microhardness there were found statistically significant differences among the chlorhexidine gluconate solution, antiseptic without alcohol and cola-based soft drink. For roughness was observed that the mean values between the initial period and after immersion in the test products differed statistically in all groups, without difference among groups. Conclusion: The microhardness of poly(methyl methacrylate) was affected by continue exposition to chlorhexidine gluconate, antiseptic without alcohol and cola-based soft drink. The roughness of poly(methyl methacrylate) is negatively influenced by the exposure to all tested products. It may be concluded that both, microhardness and roughness, were affected by the treatments.
Keywords
Resumo
Objetivo: Avaliar a rugosidade e microdureza de uma resina acrílica utilizada para base de prótese quando submetidas a diferentes bebidas e enxaguatórios bucais. Material e método: Oitenta amostras retangulares foram confeccionadas com polimetilmetacrilato, e separados em 8 grupos. As amostras foram avaliadas quanto àmicrodureza e rugosidade (Knoop) superficiais e imersas por 10 minutos em um dos seguintes produtos: café, suco artificial de limão, gluconato de clorexidina, vinho tinto, refrigerante a base de cola, vinagre e antissépticos com e sem álcool. Após a imersão nas soluções, as amostras foram acondicionados em saliva artificial por 23 horas e 50 minutos, completando o período de 24 horas. Esse procedimento ocorreu por 14 dias consecutivos e após esse período outras mensurações de microdureza e rugosidade foram realizadas. Os dados obtidos foram analisados estatisticamente pela ANOVA não paramétrico, Kruskal-Walis e teste de Dunn para a microdureza e ANOVA e t-student (α=5%) para rugosidade. Resultado: Para microdureza foram encontradas diferenças significativas entre os grupos onde houve imersão em clorexidina, antisséptico sem álcool e refrigerante de coca-cola. Para a rugosidade foi observado que a media entre os valores antes e após a imersão nos produtos diferiu estatisticamente em todos os grupos, porém sem diferença entre eles. Conclusão: A microdureza do polimetilmetacrilato foi afetada pela exposição ao gluconato de clorexidina, antisseptico sem álcool e refrigerante à base de coca-cola. A rugosidade da superfície do polimetilmetacrilato foi afetada por todos os produtos estudados.
Palavras-chave
References
1. Tsakos G, Watt RG, Rouxel PL, de Oliveira C, Demakakos P. Tooth loss associated with physical and cognitive decline in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jan;63(1):91-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13190. PMid:25523131
2. McKenzie-Green B, Giddings LS, Buttle L, Tahana K. Older peoples’ perceptions of oral health: ‘it’s just not that simple’. Int J Dent Hyg. 2009 Feb;7(1):31-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00328.x. PMid:19215309
3. Hong G, Murata H, Li Y, Sadamori S, Hamada T. Influence of denture cleansers on the color stability of three types of denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Mar;101(3):205-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60032-9. PMid:19231574
4. Sepúlveda-Navarro WF, Arana-Correa BE, Borges CP, Jorge JH, Urban VM, Campanha NH. Color stability of resins and nylon as denture base material in beverages. J Prosthodont. 2011 Dec;20(8):632-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00791.x. PMid:22040527
5. Bettencourt AF, Neves CB, Almeida MS, Pinheiro LM, Oliveira SA, Lopes LP, et al. Biodegradation of acrylic based resins: a review. Dent Mater. 2010 May;26(5):e171-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.01.006. PMid:20189238
6. Hersek N, Canay S, Uzun G, Yildiz F. Color stability of denture base acrylic resins in three food colorants. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Apr;81(4):375-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)80001-8. PMid:10095204
7. Rodrigues Garcia RC, Joane Augusto S Jr, Rached RN, Del Bel Cury AA. Effect of denture cleansers on the surface roughness and hardness of a microwave-cured acrylic resin and dental alloys. J Prosthodont. 2004 Sept;13(3):173-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04028.x. PMid:15345017
8. Azevedo A, Machado AL, Vergani CE, Giampaolo ET, Pavarina AC, Magnani R. Effect of disinfectants on the hardness and roughness of reline acrylic resins. J Prosthodont. 2006 July-Aug;15(4):235-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00112.x. PMid:16827736
9. Al-Huraishi H, Moran J, Jagger R, MacDonald E. Evaluation of stain removal and inhibition properties of eight denture cleansers: an in vitro study. Gerodontology. 2013 Mar;30(1):10-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00522.x. PMid:23088443
10. Pavarina AC, Vergani CE, Machado AL, Giampaolo ET, Teraoka MT. The effect of disinfectant solutions on the hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 July;30(7):749-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01145.x. PMid:12791163
11. Machado AL, Breeding LC, Vergani CE, da Cruz Perez LE. Hardness and surface roughness of reline and denture base acrylic resins after repeated disinfection procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Aug;102(2):115-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60120-7. PMid:19643225
12. Asad T, Watkinson AC, Huggett R. The effects of various disinfectant solutions on the surface hardness of an acrylic resin denture base material. Int J Prosthodont. 1993 Jan-Feb;6(1):9-12. PMid:8507335.
13. Neppelenbroek KH, Pavarina AC, Vergani CE, Giampaolo ET. Hardness of heat-polymerized acrylic resins after disinfection and long-term water immersion. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Feb;93(2):171-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.020. PMid:15674229
14. Ural C, Sanal FA, Cengiz S. Effect of different denture cleansers on surface roughness of denture base materials. Clin Dent Res. 2011;35(2):14-20.
15. Žilinskas J, Junevičius J, Česaitis K, Junevičiūtė G. The effect of cleaning substances on the surface of denture base material. Med Sci Monit. 2013;19:1142-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.889568. PMid:24326781
16. Jin C, Nikawa H, Makihira S, Hamada T, Furukawa M, Murata H. Changes in surface roughness and colour stability of soft denture lining materials caused by denture cleansers. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Feb;30(2):125-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01014.x. PMid:12535137
17. Regis RR, Soriani NC, Azevedo AM, Silva-Lovato CH, Paranhos HF, Souza RF. Effects of ethanol on the surface and bulk properties of a microwave-processed PMMA denture base resin. J Prosthodont. 2009 Aug;18(6):489-95.; June 3, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00475.x. PMid:19500235
18. Williams DW, Lewis MA. Isolation and identification of Candida from the oral cavity. Oral Dis. 2000 Jan;6(1):3-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2000.tb00314.x. PMid:10673781
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email