Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
https://revodontolunesp.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/1807-2577.00421
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Original Article

Effect of different placement techniques on color stability and surface roughness of resin composites

Efeito das técnicas de inserção e alisamento na estabilidade de cor e rugosidade superficial de resinas compostas

Fernanda KERPEL; Ana Carolina BAMBERG; Gabriel Ferreira NICOLOSO; Leonardo Lamberti MIOTTI; Andressa DALMOLIN; Luciana Abitante SWAROWSKY; Marcela MARQUEZAN; Letícia Brandão DURAND

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.00421 Rev. odontol. UNESP, vol.50, e20210004, 2021
PDF
Downloads: 5
Views: 889

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Longevity and clinical success of dental restorations can be influenced by many factors during the restorative procedures.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different placement techniques on color stability and surface roughness of two resin composites.

Material and method: The groups of specimens (n=10) were divided according to resin composite (FiltekTM Z250 XT and FiltekTM Z350 XT) and placement technique: Mylar strip, spatula, dry brush, modeling liquid, and surface sealant. Color stability and surface roughness were accessed using a spectrophotometer (CIELab color space) and a rugosimeter (standard cutoff of 0.8 mm), respectively, after water storage. Subsequently, the specimens were immersed in coffee for 48 h and final color was measured. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and the Tukey’s post hoc test (α=5%) and the correlation between surface roughness (Ra) and color change (∆Eab) was assessed using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Result: The different placement techniques influenced Ra and ∆Eab on both resin composites. The groups treated with surface sealant showed greater difference in ∆Eab for both resin composites. The FiltekTM Z250 XT resin showed greater color stability compared with the FiltekTM Z350 XT resin regardless of the placement technique used. Ra of each placement technique was similar among the resin composites except for the FiltekTM Z350 XT modeling liquid group, which presented lower Ra values compared with those of FiltekTM Z250 XT. A correlation between Ra and staining was identified (p=0.268).

Conclusion: Color stability and Ra are influenced by different placement techniques.

Keywords

Dental materials, dental esthetic, staining

Resumo

Resumo: Introdução: A longevidade e o sucesso clínico das restaurações dentárias podem ser influenciados por muitos fatores durante os procedimentos restauradores.

Objetivo: Avaliar a influência da técnica de alisamento na estabilidade de cor e rugosidade superficial de duas resinas compostas.

Material e método: Os grupos de amostras (n=10) foram divididos conforme a resina composta (FiltekTM Z250 XT e FiltekTM Z350 XT) e as técnicas empregadas: tira de poliéster, espátula, pincel seco, selante de superfície. A cor e a rugosidade da superfície foram avaliadas por espectrofotômetro (espaço de cor CIELab) e rugosímetro (corte padrão de 0,8 mm), respectivamente, após o armazenamento em água. Posteriormente, as amostras foram imersas em café por 48h e a cor final foi aferida. Os dados foram analisados usando teste ANOVA e Tukey post hoc (α = 5%) e a correlação entre rugosidade da superfície (Ra) e variação de cor (∆Eab) através do coeficiente de correlação de Pearson.

Resultado: As técnicas de alisamento influenciaram a Ra e a ∆Eab em ambas as resinas compostas. Os grupos tratados com selante de superfície apresentaram maior diferença na ∆Eab. A resina FiltekTM Z250 XT apresentou maior estabilidade de cor comparada à FiltekTM Z350 XT, independentemente da técnica utilizada. A Ra das técnicas de alisamento foi semelhante entre os compósitos, exceto para o grupo do líquido modelador da FiltekTM Z350 XT, que apresentou os menores valores. Uma correlação entre Ra e manchamento (p = 0,268) foi identificada.

Conclusão: A estabilidade da cor e a Ra são influenciadas pelas técnicas de alisamento utilizadas.
 

Palavras-chave

Materiais dentários, estética dental, coloração

References

1 Angerame D, De Biasi M. Do nanofilled/nanohybrid composites allow for better clinical performance of direct restorations than traditional microhybrid composites? A systematic review. Oper Dent. 2018 Jul-Aug;43(4):E191-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/17-212-L. PMid:29570022.

2 Baldissera RA, Corrêa MB, Schuch HS, Collares K, Nascimento GG, Jardim PS, et al. Are there universal restorative composites for anterior and posterior teeth? J Dent. 2013 Nov;41(11):1027-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.016. PMid:24001506.

3 Mara da Silva T, Barbosa Dantas DC, Franco TT, Franco LT, Rocha Lima Huhtala MF. Surface degradation of composite resins under staining and brushing challenges. J Dent Sci. 2019 Mar;14(1):87-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2018.11.005. PMid:30988884.

4 Nocca G, Callà C, Martorana GE, Cicillini L, Rengo S, Lupi A, et al. Effects of dental methacrylates on oxygen consumption and redox status of human pulp cells. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:956579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/956579. PMid:24693541.

5 Pagano S, Coniglio M, Valenti C, Negri P, Lombardo G, Costanzi E, et al. Biological effects of resin monomers on oral cell populations : descriptive analysis of literature. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2019 Sep;20(3):224-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2019.20.03.11. PMid:31489823.

6 Motevasselian F, Zibafar E, Yassini E, Mirzaei M, Pourmirhoseni N. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to microhybrid and nanohybrid resin composites and dental amalgam: an in vitro study. J Dent (Tehran). 2017 Nov;14(6):337-43. PMid:29942328.

7 Choi M-S, Lee Y-K, Lim B-S, Rhee S-H, Yang H-C. Changes in surface characteristics of dental resin composites after polishing. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005 Apr;16(4):347-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-005-0634-9. PMid:15803280.

8 Alzraikat H, Burrow MF, Maghaireh GA, Taha NA. Nanofilled resin composite properties and clinical performance: a review. Oper Dent. 2018 Jul-Aug;43(4):E173-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/17-208-T. PMid:29570020.

9 Kumar N, Sangi L. Water sorption, solubility, and resultant change in strength among three resin-based dental composites. J Investig Clin Dent. 2014 May;5(2):144-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12012. PMid:23188774.

10 Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-de-Souza FH, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, et al. Anterior composite restorations: a systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. Dent Mater. 2015 Oct;31(10):1214-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.005. PMid:26303655.

11 Demarco FF, Collares K, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing? Braz Oral Res. 2017 Aug;31(suppl 1):e56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0056. PMid:28902236.

12 Sedrez-Porto JA, Münchow EA, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Translucency and color stability of resin composite and dental adhesives as modeling liquids - a one-year evaluation. Braz Oral Res. 2017 Jul;31(0):e54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0054. PMid:28678973.

13 Sedrez-Porto JA, Münchow EA, Brondani LP, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Effects of modeling liquid/resin and polishing on the color change of resin composite. Braz Oral Res. 2016 Aug;30(1):S1806-83242016000100275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0088. PMid:27556554.

14 Münchow EA, Sedrez-Porto JA, Piva E, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS. Use of dental adhesives as modeler liquid of resin composites. Dent Mater. 2016 Apr;32(4):570-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.01.002. PMid:26850844.

15 Lepri CP, Palma-Dibb RG. Influence of surface sealant on the color-stability of a composite resin immersed in different beverages. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014 Sep;13(3):600-4. PMid:25284519.

16 Brooksbank A, Owens BM, Phebus JG, Blen BJ, Wasson W. Surface sealant effect on the color stability of a composite resin following ultraviolet light artificial aging. Oper Dent. 2019 May-Jun;44(3):322-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/18-053-L. PMid:30444695.

17 Ruschel VC, Bona VS, Baratieri LN, Maia HP. Effect of surface sealants and polishing time on composite surface roughness and microhardness. Oper Dent. 2018 Jul-Aug;43(4):408-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/17-048-L. PMid:29630480.

18 Pedroso LB, Barreto LFC, Miotti LL, Nicoloso GF, Durand LB. Effect of a surface sealant on the color stability of composite resins after immersion in staining solution. Gen Dent. 2016 Mar-Apr;64(2):e22-5. PMid:26943097.

19 CIE Central Bureal. CIE technical report: colorimetry. 3rd ed. Vienna: CIE Central Bureal; 2004.

20 Tuncer S, Demirci M, Tiryaki M, Ünlü N, Uysal Ö. The effect of a modeling resin and thermocycling on the surface hardness, roughness, and color of different resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013 Dec;25(6):404-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12063. PMid:24172016.

21 Khalaj K, Soudi A, Tayefi-Nasrabadi M, Keshvad MA. The evaluation of surface sealants’ effect on the color stability of nano-hybrid composite after polishing with one-step system (in-vitro). J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Sep 1;10(9):e927-32. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.54857. PMid: 30386527.

22 Prodan DA, Gasparik C, Mada DC, Miclăuş V, Băciuţ M, Dudea D. Influence of opacity on the color stability of a nanocomposite. Clin Oral Investig. 2015 May;19(4):867-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1315-1. PMid:25217277.

23 National Coffee Association Blog. NCA National Coffee Data Trends 2019 [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 29]. Available from: https://nationalcoffee.blog/2019/03/09/national-coffee-drinking-trends-2019

24 Pecho OE, Ghinea R, Alessandretti R, Pérez MM, Della Bona A. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas. Dent Mater. 2016 Jan;32(1):82-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.10.015. PMid:26631341.

25 Paravina RD, Pérez MM, Ghinea R. Acceptability and perceptibility thresholds in dentistry: a comprehensive review of clinical and research applications. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Mar;31(2):103-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12465. PMid:30891913.
 

Submitted date:
01/21/2021

Accepted date:
02/04/2021

60904ed9a9539503336a9833 rou Articles
Links & Downloads
1807-2577 (Electronic)
Rev. odontol. UNESP ©2024 All rights reserved.

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Share this page
Page Sections