Solvent action of methyl salicylate on Resilon and gutta-percha
Ação solvente do salicilato de metila sobre Resilon e guta-percha
Nascimento, Camila Almeida; Tanomaru-Filho, Mário; Bosso, Roberta; Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria; Anna-Júnior, Arnaldo Sant´; Faria, Gisele
Rev. odontol. UNESP, vol.41, n3, p.160-163, 2012
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the action of methyl salicylate in dissolving Resilon and gutta‑percha. Material and method: Ten discs of Resilon, Alpha gutta-percha and ProTaper gutta-percha were prepared (10 mm diameter × 1 mm thick) and kept at 37 °C for 48 hours. Each sample was weighed in a balance of accuracy determining the initial mass. The specimens were immersed in methyl salicylate or xylene (control) for 5 minutes, rinsed in water for 30 minutes, dried and subsequently weighed in 24 hours intervals until the stabilization of weight (final mass). The solvent capacity was expressed by the difference between the final and initial mass. The data were analyzed by using ANOVA and Tukey test with significance level of 5%. Result: The results showed that the methyl salicylate was more effective on Resilon than on gutta-percha (p < 0.05). Methyl salicylate and xylene had similar solvent action on Resilon (p > 0.05). The xylene showed better performance on gutta-percha than methyl salicylate (p < 0.05). Conclusion: It was concluded that methyl salicylate did not show solvent action on gutta-percha, however it showed effectiveness in dissolution of Resilon. Thus methyl salicylate can be a possible alternative to the use of xylene during endodontic retreatment of teeth obturated with Resilon.
Keywords
Endodontics, gutta-percha, xylenes, dissolution.
Resumo
O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a ação do salicilato de metila na dissolução de Resilon e guta-percha. Material e método: Dez discos de Resilon, guta-percha (Alpha) e guta-percha (ProTaper) foram preparados (10 mm de diâmetro × 1 mm de espessura) e mantidos a 37 °C por 48 horas. Cada amostra foi pesada em uma balança de precisão, determinando a massa inicial. Os espécimes foram imersos em salicilato de metila ou xilol (controle) por 5 minutos, lavados em água por 30 minutos, secos e, posteriormente, pesados em intervalos de 24 horas, até a estabilização da massa (massa final). A capacidade solvente foi expressa pela diferença entre a massa final e a inicial. Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância e teste de Tukey, com nível de significância de 5%. Resultado: Os resultados mostraram que o salicilato de metila foi mais efetivo sobre o Resilon do que sobre a guta‑percha (p < 0,05). A capacidade solvente do salicilato de metila foi semelhante à do xilol sobre o Resilon (p > 0,05). O xilol mostrou melhor atuação sobre a guta-percha em comparação ao salicilato de metila (p < 0,05). Conclusão: Concluiu-se que o salicilato de metila não apresenta atuação solvente sobre guta-percha, sendo eficaz na dissolução do Resilon. O salicilato de metila demonstra ser alternativa ao uso do xilol durante o retratamento endodôntico de dentes obturados com Resilon.
Palavras-chave
Endodontia, guta-percha, xilenos, dissolução.
Referências
1. Ruddle CJ. Nonsurgical retreatment. J Endod. 2004; 30:827‑45. PMid:15564860. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000145033.15701.2d
2. de Oliveira DP, Barbizam JV, Trope M,Teixeira FB. Comparison between gutta-percha and Resilon removal using two different techniques in endodontic retreatment. J Endod. 2006; 32:362-4. PMid:16554213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.12.006
3. Economides N, Koulaouzidou EA, Gogos C, Kolokouris I, Beltes P, Antoniades D. Comparative study of the cytotoxic effect of Resilon against two cell lines. Braz Dent J. 2008; 19:291-5. PMid:19180316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402008000400001
4. Gorduysus MO, Tasman F, Tuncer S, Etikan I. Solubilizing efficiency of different gutta-percha solvents: a comparative study. J Nihon Univ Sch Dent. 1997; 39:133-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.2334/josnusd1959.39.133
5. Tanomaru-Filho M, Orlando TA, Bortoluzzi EA, Silva GF, Tanomaru JM. Solvent capacity of different substances on gutta‑percha and Resilon. Braz Dent J. 2010; 21:46‑9. PMid:20464320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103‑64402010000100007
6. Zarei M, Shahrami F, Vatanpour M. Comparison between gutta‑percha and Resilon retreatment. J Oral Sci. 2009; 51:181‑5. PMid:19550084. http://dx.doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.51.181
7. Bodrumlu E, Uzun O, Topuz O, Semiz M. Efficacy of 3 techniques in removing root canal filling material. J Can Dent Assoc. 2008; 74:721. PMid:18845062.
8. Lapczynski A, Jones L, McGinty D, Bhatia SP, Letizia CS, Api AM. Fragrance material review on methyl salicylate. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007; 45:S428–S452. PMid:18031908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.053
9. Schirrmeister JF, Meyer KM, Hermanns P, Altenburger MJ, Wrbas KT. Effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for removing a new synthetic polymer-based root canal obturation material (Epiphany) during retreatment. Int Endod J. 2006; 39:150-6. PMid:16454796. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01066.x
10. Venturi M, Prati C, Capelli G, Falconi M, Breschi L. A preliminary analysis of the morphology of lateral canals after root canal filling using a tooth-clearing technique. Int Endod J. 2003; 36:54-63. PMid:12656515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0143-2885.2003.00613.x
11. International Organization for Standardization. Dental root canal sealing materials. ISO 6876:2001.
12. Bodrumlu E, Er O, Kayaoglu G. Solubility of root canal sealers with different organic solvents. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 106:e67-9. PMid:18602299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.007
13. Whitworth JM, Boursin EM. Dissolution of root canal sealer cements in volatile solvents. Int Endod J. 2000; 33:19‑24. PMid:11307469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365‑2591.2000.00266.x
14. Schafer E, Zandbiglari T. A comparison of the effectiveness of chloroform and eucalyptus oil in dissolving root canal sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002; 93:611-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.121899
15. Martos J, Gastal MT, Sommer L, Lund RG, Del Pino FA, Osinaga PW. Dissolving efficacy of organic solvents on root canal sealers. Clin Oral Investig. 2006; 10:50-4. PMid:16317555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-005-0023-2
16. Magalhaes BS, Johann JE, Lund RG, Martos J, Del Pino FA. Dissolving efficacy of some organic solvents on gutta-percha. Braz Oral Res. 2007; 21:303-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242007000400004
17. Faria-Junior NB, Loiola LE, Guerreiro-Tanomaru J M, Berbert FL, Tanomaru-Filho M. Effectiveness of three solvents and two associations of solvents on gutta-percha and Resilon. Braz Dent J. 2011; 22:41-4. PMid:21519647.
18. Ezzie E, Fleury A, Solomon E, Spears R, He J. Efficacy of retreatment techniques for a resin-based root canal obturation material. J Endod. 2006; 32:341-4. PMid:16554208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.010
19. Oyama KO, Siqueira EL, Santos M. In vitro study of effect of solvent on root canal retreatment. Braz Dent J. 2002; 13:208‑11. PMid:12428599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402002000300014
20. Chutich MJ, Kaminski EJ, Miller DA, Lautenschlager EP. Risk assessment of the toxicity of solvents of gutta-percha used in endodontic retreatment. J Endod. 1998; 24:213-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80098-8
21. Higashi Y, Kiuchi T, Furuta K. Efficacy and safety profile of a topical methyl salicylate and menthol patch in adult patients with mild to moderate muscle strain: a randomized, double‑blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. Clin Ther. 2010; 32:34-43. PMid:20171409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.01.016
22. Zhang D, Liu R, Sun L, Huang C, Wang C, Zhang DM, et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of methyl salicylate glycosides isolated from Gaultheria yunnanensis (Franch.) Rehder. Molecules. 2011; 16:3875-84. PMid:21555977. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules16053875
23. Stoner GD, Shimkin MB, Kniazeff AJ, Weisburger JH, Weisburger EK, Gori G. B. Test for carcinogenicity of food additives and chemotherapeutic agents by the pulmonary tumor response in strain A mice. Cancer Res. 1973; 33:3069‑85. PMid:4202501.
24. Safety assessment of Salicylic Acid, Butyloctyl Salicylate, Calcium Salicylate, C12-15 Alkyl Salicylate, Capryloyl Salicylic Acid, Hexyldodecyl Salicylate, Isocetyl Salicylate, Isodecyl Salicylate, Magnesium Salicylate, MEA-Salicylate, Ethylhexyl Salicylate, Potassium Salicylate, Methyl Salicylate, Myristyl Salicylate, Sodium Salicylate, TEA-Salicylate, and Tridecyl Salicylate. Int J Toxicol. 2003; 22 (Suppl 3):1-108.
25. Daston GP, Rehnberg BF, Carver B, Rogers EH, Kavlock RJ. Functional teratogens of the rat kidney. I. Colchicine, dinoseb, and methyl salicylate. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1988; 11:381‑400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0272-0590(88)90104-2
26. Tanomaru Filho M, Jorge EG, Tanomaru JMG. Solvent capacity of eucalyptol and xylol on different endodontic sealers. Cienc Odontol Bras. 2006; 9:60-65.
27. Barbosa SV, Burkard DH, Spangberg LS. Cytotoxic effects of gutta-percha solvents. J Endod. 1994; 20:6-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0099-2399(06)80018-X
28. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ASTDR). Toxicological Profile for Xylene. 2007.
29. Musk ambrette and musk xylene. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 1996; 65:477-95. PMid:9097117.
30. Vajrabhaya LO, Suwannawong SK, Kamolroongwarakul R, Pewklieng L. Cytotoxicity evaluation of gutta-percha solvents: chloroform and GP-Solvent (limonene). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 98:756-9. PMid:15583552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. tripleo.2004.05.002
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email