Subjective assessment of adhesives usage by complete denture wearers in a Brazilian population
Avaliação subjetiva do uso de adesivos por portadores de próteses totais bimaxilares em uma população brasileira
Pero, Ana Carolina; Paleari, André Gustavo; Rodriguez, Larissa Santana; Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin; Roccia, Andréia Alonso; Compagnoni, Marco Antonio
Rev. odontol. UNESP, vol.41, n1, p.38-42, 2012
Abstract
Introduction: The information about the knowledge and usage of denture adhesives is still limited, particularly in Brazilian populations. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the aspects related to the use or nonuse of denture adhesives by complete denture wearers. Material and method: Questionnaires were applied to 100 bimaxillary complete denture wearers concerning their usage of denture adhesives. The survey was carried out according to three categories: those who had never tried adhesive, those who had tried adhesive at least once but no longer used it, and those who currently used it. Result: Of the 100 participants, 80% had never tried adhesives, 16% had tried at least once but no longer used it and 4% had used on a regular basis. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the results of this subjective assessment suggest that within the participants that had never tried adhesives, 77.5% inform that the adhesive is not needed, and all participants who regularly use it inform its efficiency.
Keywords
Denture, complete, adhesives, questionnaires.
Resumo
Introdução: Estudos subjetivos sobre o conhecimento e uso de adesivos para prótese ainda é limitado, especialmente em populações brasileiras. Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar os aspectos relacionados ao uso ou não de adesivos para prótese por usuários de próteses totais. Material e método: Foram aplicados a 100 usuários de próteses totais bimaxilares questionários relativos à utilização de adesivos para prótese. A pesquisa foi realizada de acordo com três categorias: aqueles que nunca tinham experimentado o adesivo, aqueles que já tinham utilizado o adesivo pelo menos uma vez e que já não utilizavam mais, e aqueles que utilizam regularmente. Resultado: Dos 100 participantes, 80% nunca haviam utilizados adesivos, 16% já haviam experimentado pelo menos uma vez, mas já não utilizavam mais e 4% utilizavam regularmente. Conclusão: Dentro das limitações deste estudo, os resultados desta avaliação subjetiva sugere que entre os participantes que nunca haviam experimentado adesivos, 77,5% informaram que o adesivo não era necessário, e todos os participantes que utilizam regularmente informaram a sua eficiência.
Palavras-chave
Prótese total, adesivos, questionários.
References
1. Moreira RAS, Nico LS, Tomita NE. Oral health conditions among the elderly in Southeastern São Paulo State. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17:170‑8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000300008
2. Carlsson GE, Omar R. The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation. A critical review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:143-56. PMid:20002536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02039.x
3. Celebić A, Knezović-Zlatarić D. A comparison of patient’s satisfaction between complete and partial removable denture wearers. J Dent. 2003;31:445-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00094-0
4. Berg E. Acceptance of full dentures. Int Dent J. 1993;43:299-306. PMid:8406961.
5. Mañes JF, Selva EJ, De-Barutell A, Bouazza K. Comparison of the retention strengths of three complete denture adhesives: an in vivo study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16:e132-6. PMid:20526270.
6. Kulak Y, Ozcan M, Arikan A. Subjective assessment by patients of the efficiency of two denture adhesive pastes. J Prosthodont. 2005;14:248‑52. PMid:16359481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00049.x
7. Emami E, Heydecke G, Rompré PH, de Grandmont P, Feine JS. Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:533-44. PMid:19515032.
8. Ellis JS, Pelekis ND, Thomason JM. Conventional rehabilitation of edentulous patients: the impact on oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction. J Prosthodont. 2007;16:37-42. PMid:17244306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00152.x
9. Pradíes G, Sanz I, Evans O, Martnez F, Sanz M. Clinical study comparing the efficacy of two denture adhesives in complete denture patients. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22:361-7. PMid:19639073.
10. Koronis S, Pizatos E, Polyzois G, Lagouvardos P. Clinical evaluation of three denture cushion adhesives by complete denture wearers. Gerodontology. 2010. Nov 17. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.436.x. [Epub ahead of print]. PMid:21083736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1741-2358.2010.436.x
11. Figueiral MH, Fonseca PA, Pereira-Leite C, Scully C. The effect of different adhesive materials on retention of maxillary complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24:175-7. PMid:21479288.
12. Grasso JE, Rendell J, Gay T. Effect of denture adhesive on the retention and stability of maxillary dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:399‑405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90560-6
13. Ekstrand K, Hensten-Pettersen A, Kullmann A. Denture adhesives: cytotoxicity, microbial contamination, and formaldehyde content. J Prosthet Dent.1993; 69:314-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90112-2
14. Felton D, Cooper L, Duqum I, Minsley G, Guckes A, Haug S, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the care and maintenance of complete dentures: a publication of the American College of Prosthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142:1S-20S. PMid:21282672.
15. Nicolas E, Veyrune JL, Lassauzay C. A six-month assessment of oral health-related quality of life of complete denture wearers using denture adhesive: a pilot study. J Prosthodont. 2010;19:443-8. PMid:20456031. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00601.x
16. Ozcan M, Kulak Y, de Baat C, Arikan A, Ucankale M. The effect of a new denture adhesive on bite force until denture dislodgement. J Prosthodont. 2005;14:122-6. PMid:16011623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00020.x
17. De Baat C, van’t Hof M, van Zeghbroeck L, Ozcan M, Kalk W. An international multicenter study on the effectiveness of a denture adhesive in maxillary dentures using disposable gnathometers. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11:237-43. PMid:17431692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00784-007-0109-0
18. Shay K. Denture adhesives. Choosing the right powders and pastes. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991;122:70-6.
19. Slaughter A, Katz RV, Grasso JE. Professional attitudes toward denture adhesives: A Delphi technique survey of academic prosthodontists. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:80-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70131-9
20. Fakhri H, Fayaz A, Faramarzi F, Javaheri HH. The knowledge and attitude of general dentists toward denture adhesives in Tehran. Indian J Dent Res. 2009;20:164-8. PMid:19553716. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.52892
21. Grasso JE. Denture adhesives: changing attitudes. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127:90-6. PMid:8568103.
22. Ozcan M, Kulak Y, Arikan A, Silahtar E. The attitude of complete denture wearers towards denture adhesives in Istanbul. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:131-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01224.x
23. Coates AJ. Usage of denture adhesives. J Dent. 2000;28:137-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00046-9
24. Douglass CW, Shih A, Ostry L. Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020? J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:5-8. PMid:11807476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.121203
25. Shigli K. Aftercare of the complete denture patient. J Prosthodont. 2009;18:688-93. PMid:19682212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532- 849X.2009.00500.x
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email