Effect of additional hydrofobic layer on the microtensile bond strenght of all-in-one adhesive systems
Efeitos da aplicação de resina hidrofóbica sobre a resistência de união de adesivos autocondicionantes de frasco único
Bortolatto, Janaína Freitas; Takatsui, Fabiana; Oliveira Junior, Osmir Batista de; Andrade, Marcelo Ferrarezi de; Kuga, Milton Carlos; Campos, E.A.
Rev. odontol. UNESP, vol.40, n3, p.113-117, 2011
Abstract
Introduction: It is known that self-etching adhesive systems can act as semi-permeable membranes. Objective: Evaluate the effects of additional layer of hydrophobic resin on the microtensile bond strength of self-etching one‑bottle adhesives. Material and method: Sixty bovine incisors were used in this study. The facial enamel surfaces of the crowns were abraded with silicon carbide paper to expose flat, mid-coronal dentin surfaces. The following adhesives were used: Clearfil Tri S Bond (CTSB), AdheSE One (ADH) and One Coat 7.0 (OC). Each material was tested with and without applying an additional layer of hydrophobic material from the same manufacturer. Z-350 composite resin was inserted in three 1 mm increments. All adhesive restorative procedure was performed under simulated pulpal pressure and the microtensile test was performed immediately after curing the composite resin. Data were submitted to ANOVA and Tukey test (p < 0.05). Result: For all adhesives tested, the worst results were observed in groups which the additional layer of hydrophobic resin was not applied. Conclusion: The application of additional layer of hydrophobic material can improve the adhesion of self-etching all-in-one adhesive systems.
Keywords
Adhesive systems, bond strength, composite resins
Resumo
Introdução: Sabe-se que sistemas adesivos autocondicionantes podem atuar como membranas semipermeáveis, o que pode comprometer a adesão. Objetivo: Buscou-se avaliar os efeitos da aplicação adicional de resina hidrofóbica sobre a resistência de união à microtração de sistemas adesivos autocondicionantes de frasco único sobre dentina bovina. Material e método: Sessenta incisivos bovinos tiveram a face vestibular desgastada até se obter superfície dentinária plana. Foram utilizados os seguintes sistemas adesivos: Clearfil Tri S Bond (CTSB), AdheSE One (ADO) e One Coat 7.0 (OC). Os sistemas adesivos foram testados com (G4, G5, G6) e sem (G1, G2, G3) a aplicação de camada adicional de material hidrofóbico do mesmo fabricante (Clearfil SE Bond, AdheSE e One Coat SE, respectivamente), resultando em seis grupos experimentais (n = 10). Após o procedimento adesivo, resina composta Z-350 foi inserida em três incrementos de 1 mm. Todo o procedimento adesivo restaurador foi executado sob pressão pulpar simulada e o teste de microtração foi executado imediatamente após a polimerização da resina composta. Os dados obtidos foram submetidos à ANOVA e ao teste de Tukey (p < 0,05). Resultado: Para todos os adesivos testados, os piores resultados foram observados nos grupos em que a camada adicional de resina hidrofóbica não foi aplicada. Conclusão: A aplicação de camada adicional de material hidrofóbico pode melhorar a resistência de união de sistemas adesivos autocondicionantes de passo único.
Palavras-chave
Sistemas adesivos, resistência de união, resinas compostas.
References
1. Campos EA, Saad JRC, Oliveira Júnior OB, Porto Neto ST, Campos LA, Andrade MF. Efeito da inserção tardia de resina composta sobre a resistência de união de sistemas adesivos autocondicionantes. Rev Sul Bras Odontol. 2009;6:249-55.
2. Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, et al. Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self‑etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2005;84:183-8. PMid:15668338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400214
3. Ito S, Tay F, Hashimoto M, Yoshiyama M, Saito T, Brackett WW, et al. Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7:133-41. PMid:16052762.
4. Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent. 2002;30:83-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00002-7
5. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res. 1990;69:1652-8. PMid:2212209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690100501
6. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent. 2002;30:371-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00064-7
7. Cheong C, King NM, Pashley DH, Ferrari M, Toledano M, Tay FR. Incompatibility of self-etch adhesives with chemical/dual-cured composites: two-step vs one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2003;28:747-55. PMid:14653290.
8. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh B, Carvalho R, Miller M. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization, part I: bond strength and morphologic evidence. Am J Dent. 2004;17:271-8. PMid:15478490.
9. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Garcia-Godoy F, Yiu CK. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization, part II: silver tracer penetration evidence. Am J Dent.2004;17: 315-22. PMid:15575440.
10. Hashimoto M, Ito S, Tay FR, Svizero NR, Sano H, Kaga M, et al. Fluid movement across the resin-dentin interface during and after bonding. J Dent Res. 2004;83:843-8. PMid:15505233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154405910408301104
11. Itthagarum A, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Wefel JF, Garcia-Godoy F, Wei SH. Single step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization, part III: evidence from fluid conductance and artificial caries inhibition. Am J Dent. 2004;17: 394-400. PMid:15724748.
12. Brackett WW, Ito S, Tay FR, Haisch LD, Pashley DH. Microtensile dentin bond strength of self-etching resins: effect of a hydrophobic layer. Oper Dent. 2005;30:733-8. PMid:16382596.
13. King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Hashimoto M, Ito S, Brackett WW, et al. Conversion of one-step to two-step self-etch adhesives for improved efficacy and extended application. Am J Dent. 2005;18:126-34. PMid:15973833.
14. Nakaoki Y, Sasakawa W, Horiuchi S, Nagano F, Ikeda T, Tanaka T, et al. Effect of double-application of all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Dent. 2005;33:765-72. PMid:16199285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.02.007
15. De Silva AL, Lima DA, de Souza GM, dos Santos CT, Paulillo LA. Influence of additional adhesive application on the microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems. Oper Dent. 2006;31:562-8. PMid:17024944. http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/05-98
16. Nakamichi I, Iwako M, Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res. 1983 Oct;62:1076-81. PMid:6352757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620101501
17. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C, et al. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent. 2001;29:55-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00049-X
18. Ando S, Watanabe T, Tsubota K, Yoshida T, Irokawa A, Takamizawa T, et al. Effect of adhesive application methods on bond strength to bovine enamel. J Oral Sci. 2008;50:181-6. PMid:18587208. http://dx.doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.50.181
19. Asaka Y, Yamaguchi K, Inage H, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Rikuta A, et al. Effect of thermal cycling on bond strengths of single-step self-etch adhesives to bovine dentin. J Oral Sci. 2006;48:63-9. PMid:16858134. http://dx.doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.48.63
20. Campos EA, Correr GM, Leonardi DP, Barato Filho F, Gonzaga CC, Zielak JC. Chlorexidine diminishes the loss of bond strenght over time under simulated pulpal pressure and thermo-mechanical stressing. J Dent. 2009;37:108-14. PMid:19022552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jdent.2008.10.003
21. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater. 2008;24:90-101. PMid:17442386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.009
22. Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Sauro S, Tay FR, Di Lenarda R, Prati C, et al. Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:525-30. PMid:16324144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00251.x
23. Li H, Wang WM, Yu SL, Wen Q. Morphological and microtensile bond strength evaluation of three adhesive systems to cariesaffected human dentine with chemomechanical caries removal. J Dent. 2011;39:332-9. PMid:21333713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jdent.2011.02.004
24. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials: a study on fluid permeability using confocal fluorescence microscopy. J Dent Res. 1998;77:1749-59. PMid:9759672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345980770091101
25. Chersoni S, Suppa P, Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Yiu C, et al. In vivo and in vitro permeability of one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2004;83:459-64. PMid:15153452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300605
26. Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res. 2000;79:812-17. PMid:10765953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790030501
27. Koike T, Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Yukitani W, Yamashita T, Wakumoto S, et al. Effect of multiple application of a dentin adhesive on contraction gap width of a resin-based composite. Am J Dent. 2002;15:159-63. PMid:12469752.
28. Reis A, Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, Mattei G, Bauer JR, Grande RH, et al. Can the durability of one-step self-etch adhesives be improved by double application or by an extra layer of hydrophobic resin. J Dent. 2008;36:309-15. PMid:18353520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jdent.2008.01.018
29. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munk J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005;21:864-81. PMid:16009415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email