Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
https://revodontolunesp.com.br/article/588018897f8c9d0a098b4cbe
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Review Article

Tratamento de superfície e cimentação adesiva de cerâmicas aluminizadas: revisão de literatura

Surface treatment and adhesive cementing of glass-infiltrated Alumina ceramic: review of the literature

Aras, W.M.F.; León, B.L.T.

Downloads: 10
Views: 1631

Abstract

Nas últimas décadas, as cerâmicas odontológicas, os sistemas adesivos e os agentes cimentantes têm sido estudados, objetivando encontrar novos mecanismos que permitam uma união mais efetiva e duradoura entre os tecidos dentários duros e a restauração indireta. Sabe-se que o procedimento de preparo para cerâmicas feldspáticas requer o condicionamento da sua superfície com ácido fluorídrico prévio à cimentação. Entretanto, para cerâmicas aluminizadas, em face das suas características estruturais, o condicionamento ácido não é indicado. Dessa maneira, a escolha do preparo de superfície e do sistema cimentante resinoso torna-se extremamente importante quando se almeja o sucesso do tratamento reabilitador. A presente revisão de literatura teve como objetivo buscar as bases científicas relativas às técnicas alternativas de tratamento superficial e aos agentes cimentantes para cerâmicas reforçadas. Para tanto, artigos publicados no período de 1998 a 2007 foram selecionados e analisados, permitindo aos autores concluírem que ainda não há consenso a respeito dos métodos alternativos de tratamento de superfície para os sistemas cerâmicos à base de alumina e da seleção de materiais cimentantes que, usados em conjunto, apresentem resistência de união plenamente satisfatória. Portanto, mais estudos são requeridos a fim de testar e compreender os mecanismos adesivos responsáveis pela estabilidade das restaurações indiretas a longo prazo.

Keywords

Cimentos dentários, porcelana dental, resistência à tração, resistência ao cisalhamento.

Resumo

In the last decades, the dental ceramics, the adhesive systems and luting agents have been studied, objectifying to find new mechanisms that allow to an a more effective and durable bond between the hard tissue dental and indirect restoration. It is known that the procedure of preparation for feldspathic ceramics requires the surface conditioning with hydrofluoric acid prior to cementing. Meanwhile alumina ceramics, in face of its structural features, the acid etching is not indicated. In this way, the choice of surface preparation and the resin luting system becomes extremely important when it seeks to successful rehabilitation treatment. The present review of literature had as objective to search cientific bases about alternative techniques of the surface treatment and luting agents for high-strength ceramics. For in such a way, articles published in the period 1998 to 2007 had been selected and analyzed, allowing to the authors to conclude that still there is not enough consensus and evidences, regarding the use of alternative methods of surface treatment for the ceramic-based alumina systems and the selection of luting materials that jointly present fully satisfactory strength bond. Therefore, further studies are required in order to test and to understand the responsible adhesive mechanisms by the stability of the indirect restorations in the long term.

Palavras-chave

Dental cements, dental porcelain, tensile strength, shear strength

References

 


1. Costa JLV, Lopes LG, Pedrosa Filho CF, Pedrosa SF, Coelho JCB, Costa AM, et al. O estágio atual das cerâmicas odontológicas. PCL. 2006;8(40):193-8.

2. Della Bona A. Characterizing ceramics and the interfacial adhesion to resin: II – the relationship of surface treatment, bond strength, interfacial toughness and fractography. J Appl Oral Sci. 2005;13:101-9.

3. Valandro LF, Mallmann A, Della Bona A, Bottino MA. Bonding to densely sintered Alumina and glass infiltrated aluminum/zirconium-based ceramics. J Appl Oral Sci. 2005;13:47-52.

4. Janda R, Roulet J-F, Wulf M, Tiller H-J. A new adhesive technology for all-ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003;19:567-73.

5. Stewart GP, Jain P, Hodges J. Shear bond strength of resin cements to both ceramic and dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:277-84.

6. Kato H, Matsumura H, Ide T, Atsuta M. Improved bonding of adhesive resin to sintered porcelain with combination of acid etching and a two-liquid silane conditioner. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:102-8.

7. Borges GA, Sophr AM, Góes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DCN. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:479-88.

8. Michida, SMA, Valandro LF, Yoshiga S, Andreatta Filho OD, Balducci I, Bottino MA. Efeito do tratamento de superfície de uma cerâmica aluminizada infiltrada de vidro sobre a resistência à microtração. J Appl Oral Sci. 2003;11:361-6.

9. Raposo CAM, Saito T. Influência do tratamento superficial da porcelana, do tipo de cimento resinoso e da termociclagem na resistência à tração da interface porcelana/ dentina. RPG. Rev Pos-Grad. 2000;7:240-4.

10. Özcan M. The use of chairside silica coating for different dental applications: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:469-72.

11. Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003;19:725-31.

12. Saygili G, Şahmali S. Effect of ceramic surface treatment on the shear bond strengths of two resin luting agents to All-Ceramic materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30:758-64.

13. Amaral R, Özcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater. 2006;22:283-90.

14. Della Bona A, Borba M, Benetti P, Cecchetti D. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of a zirconiareinforced ceramic to composite resin. Braz Oral Res. 2007;21:10-5.

15. Kussano CM, Bonfante G, Batista JG, Pinto JHN. Evaluation of shear bond strength of composite to porcelain according to surface treatment. Braz Dent J. 2003;14:132-5.

16. Begazo CC, Boer HD, Kleverlaan CJ, van Wass MAJ, Feilzer AJ. Shear bond strength of different types of luting cements to an aluminum oxide-reinforced glass ceramic core material. Dent Mater. 2004;20:901-7.

17. Thompson JY, Rapp MM, Parker AJ. Microscopic and energy dispersive X-ray analysis of surface adaptation of dental cements to dental ceramic surfaces. J Prosthetic Dent. 1998;79:378-83.

18. Prakki A, Carvalho RM. Cimentos resinosos Dual: características e considerações clínicas. PGR: Pós- Graduação em Revista. 2001;4:21-6.

19. De Munck J, Vargas M, van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrecchts P, van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an autoadhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater. 2004;20:963-71.

20. Piwowarczky A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:265-73.

21. Hikita K, van Meerbeek B, de Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater. 2007;23:71-80.

22. Madani M, Chu FCS, McDonald AV, Smales RJ. Effects of surface treatments on shear bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:644-7.

23. Kim BK, Bae HEK, Shim JS, Lee KW. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to All-Ceramic coping materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:357-62.

24. Isgrò G, Pallav P, van der Zel JM, Feilzer AJ. The influence of the veneering porcelain and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of a heatpressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:465-73.

25. Lu Y-C, Tseng H, Shih Y-H, Lee S-Y. Effects of surface treatments on bond strength of glass-infiltrated ceramic. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:805-13.

26. Della Bona A, Shen C, Anusavice KJ. Work of adhesion of resin on treated Lithia Disilicate-based ceramic. Dent Mater. 2004;20:338-44.

 

588018897f8c9d0a098b4cbe rou Articles
Links & Downloads

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Share this page
Page Sections