Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
https://revodontolunesp.com.br/article/588017dc7f8c9d0a098b494a
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Original Article

Avaliação das alterações funcionais associadas ao período de adaptação de pacientes usuários de próteses totais

Evaluation of the functional changes associate to the adaptation period in complete denture wearers

Compagnoni, M.A.; Souza, R.F.; Leles, C.R.; Marra, J.; Pero, A.C.

Downloads: 1
Views: 1141

Resumo

A fase de adaptação funcional que ocorre nos pacientes após a instalação de próteses totais (PTs) é uma das mais críticas em relação à aceitação da prótese devido às dificuldades iniciais transitórias que o paciente enfrenta. O presente estudo teve como objetivo avaliar as possíveis alterações no padrão de movimentos mandibulares decorrentes da instalação de PTs em indivíduos edentados, durante o período de adaptação funcional das próteses. Foi empregado o sistema de diagnóstico cinesiográfico K6-I (Myotronics Research Inc., Seattle, WA) para a avaliação de 15 pacientes previamente tratados com confecção de PTs. Foram realizados registros da amplitude e da velocidade dos movimentos mandibulares de abertura e fechamento, do movimento da mandíbula entre a posição de repouso postural e a oclusão cêntrica e do movimento da mandíbula durante a mastigação e registro do limite de movimentos mandibulares de abertura e fechamento, lateralidade e protrusão. Foram realizadas seis sessões: I. no momento da instalação das PTs, após os ajustes necessários; II. 24 horas; III. 48 horas; IV. uma semana; V. 2 semanas; VI. 30 dias após instalação. Os dados obtidos foram tabulados e submetidos ao teste de Friedman (nível de significância 5%). Os resultados demonstraram que o padrão dos movimentos mandibulares pouco se altera em função do tempo de instalação estudado. Concluiu-se por meio de análise cinesiográfica, que a instalação de próteses totais não alterou o padrão de movimentos mandibulares em indivíduos edentados, durante um mês de acompanhamento.

Palavras-chave

Prótese total, instalação, cinesiografia

Abstract

After complete denture insertion, edentulous patients usually present transitory difficulties. This is one of the most critical stages of prosthetic treatment and it is strongly related to the prostheses acceptance. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential changes in the mandibular movement pattern related to insertion of the complete denture during the functional adaptation period. The Kinesiograph instrument K6-I (Myotronics Research Inc., Seattle, WA) was used to evaluate fifteen edentulous patients that received conventional complete denture treatment. Recordings of opening and closure movement limits, movement velocity, postural rest position, chewing cycle and limits of eccentric movements were performed. Each patient was evaluated in six different stages: I. immediately after insertion of the new dentures; II. 24 hours; III. 48 hours; IV. 1 week; V. 2 weeks and VI. 30 days after insertion of the dentures. The results showed that there were no remarkable changes in the mandibular motion patterns after insertion of the new dentures. It was suggested that the problems related to the process of utilization of the new dentures are not strictly associated to the mandibular movement. Therefore, the insertion of the complete denture did not modify the mandibular movement pattern in edentulous patients, by means of kinesiographic study, during one month of accompaniment.

Keywords

Complete denture, instalation, kinesiographic

References



1. Allen PF, McMillan AS, Locker D. An assessment of sensitivity to change of the Oral Health Impact Profile in a clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001; 29:175-82.

2. Allen PF, McMillan AS. A longitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14:173-9.

3. American Dental Association. Council on Scientific Affairs. Report on acceptance of TMD devices. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996; 127:1615-6.

4. Basker RM, Davenport JC, Tomlin HR. Prosthetic treatment for the edentulous patient. 3rd ed. London: McMillan; 1992.

5. Bates JF, Stafford GD, Harrison A. Masticatory function a review of the literature. 1. The form of the masticatory cycle. J Oral Rehabil. 1975; 2:281-301.

6. Berg E. A 2-year follow-up study of patient satisfaction with new complete dentures. J Dent. 1988; 16:160-5.

7. Berg E, Johnsen TB, Ingebretsen R. Social variables and patient acceptance of complete dentures. A study of patients attending a dental school. Acta Odontol Scand. 1985; 43:199-203.

8. Bergman B, Carlsson G. Clinical long-term study of complete denture wearers. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53:56-61.

9. Brill N, Tryde G, Schübeler S. The role of learning in denture retention. J Prosthet Dent. 1960; 10:468-75.

10. Carlsson GE, Otterland A, Wennstrom A. Patient factors in appreciation of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1967; 17:322-8.

11. Chaney SA, Moller KT, Goodkind RJ. Effects of immediate dentures on certain structural and perceptual parameters of speech. J Prosthet Dent. 1978; 40:8-12.

12. Compagnoni MA, Souza RF, Leles CR. Kinesiographic study of complete denture movement related to mucosa displacement in edentulous patients. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003; 17:356-61.

13. Jankelson B, Swain CW, Crane PF, Radke JC. Kinesiometric instrumentation: a new technology. J Am Dent Assoc. 1975; 90:834-40.

14. Jankelson B. Measurement accuracy of the mandibular kinesiograph – a computerized study. J Prosthet Dent. 1980; 44:656-66.

15. Leles CR, Compagnoni MA, Souza RF, Barbosa DB. Kinesiographic study of mandibular movements during functional adaptation to complete dentures. J Appl Oral Sci. 2003; 11:311-8.

16. Manly RS, Pfaffman C, Lathrop DD, Keyser J. Oral sensory thresholds of persons with natural and artificial dentitions. J Dent Res. 1952; 31:305-12.

17. Manns A, Miralles R, Guerrero F. The changes in electrical activity of the postural muscles of the mandible upon varying the vertical dimension. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 45:438-45.

18. Michelotti A, Farella M, Vollaro S, Martina R. Mandibular rest position and electrical activity of the masticatory muscles. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78:48-53.

19. Michman J, Langer A. Clinical and electromyographic observations during adjustment to complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1968; 19:252-62.

20. Michman J, Langer A. Postinsertion changes in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1975; 34:125-34.

21. Mohl ND. Neuromuscular mechanisms in mandibular function. Dent Clin North Am. 1978; 22:63-71.

22. Morstad A, Petersen A. Postinsertion denture problems. J Prosthet Dent. 1968; 19:126-32.

23. Myotronics Research. K6-I Diagnostic system – user’s guide. Seattle: Myotronics Research; 1997.

24. Nishigawa K, Nakano M, Bando E, Clark GT. Effect of altered occlusal guidance on lateral border movement of the mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68:965-9.

25. Rendell J, Grasso JE, Gay T. Retention and stability of the maxillary denture during function. J Prosthet Dent. 1995; 73:344-7.

26. Rugh J, Drago C. Vertical dimension: a study of clinical rest position and jaw muscle activity. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 45:670-5.

27. Russi S, Lombardo JG, Compagnoni MA, Nogueira SS. Prótese total clínica. Araraquara: Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara; 1982.

28. Shi CS, Ouyang G, Guo TW. A comparative study of mastication between complete denture wearers and dentate subjects. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 66:505-9.

29. Tallgren A. Changes in adult face height due to aging, wear and loss of teeth and prosthetic treatment. Acta Odontol Scand. 1957; 15:1-122.

30. Tallgren A, Lang BR, Walker GF, Ash MM Jr. Changes in jaw relations, hyoid position, and head posture in complete denture wearers. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 50:148-56.

31. Tallgren A, Mizutani H, Tryde G. A two-year kinesiographic study of mandibular movement patterns in denture wearers. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62:594-600.

32. Usumez A, Usumez S, Orhan M. Effect of complete dentures on dynamic measurement of changing head position: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90:394-400.

33. Wood WW, Gelfant H, Hannam AG. Effect of occlusal reconstruction on the reproducibility of chewing movements. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 46:181-4.
588017dc7f8c9d0a098b494a rou Articles
Links & Downloads

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Share this page
Page Sections