Influência do diâmetro foraminal do canal radicular, do tipo e da penetração de agulha, e do fluxo da solução irrigadora na limpeza e na extrusão apical
Influence of apical foramen diameter, design and penetration depth of the needle and irrigating solution flow rate on cleaning and apical extrusion
Tanomaru-Filho, Mário; Loiola, Livia Etchebehere de; Miano, Lucas Martinati; Chavez-Andrade, Gissele Moraima; Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria
Resumo
Introdução: A irrigação do canal radicular visa a limpeza e desinfecção do sistema de canais radiculares, sem promover extrusão apical. Objetivo: Avaliar a influência do diâmetro foraminal do canal radicular, da penetração e do tipo de agulha, e do fluxo na limpeza e na extrusão apical da solução irrigadora. Material e método: Doze dentes incisivos inferiores humanos com canal único foram instrumentados e, após ampliação foraminal com diferentes diâmetros (LK #40 e 60), os canais radiculares foram preenchidos com solução de contraste radiológico espessada com propilenoglicol e óxido de zinco. Foram utilizados dois tipos de agulhas de irrigação 27G com diferentes designs (abertura apical ou lateral), dois fluxos correspondentes a 15 ou 25 mL/min, e com penetração das agulhas em duas profundidades (3 e 6 mm aquém do ápice). Antes e após irrigação, os dentes foram radiografados utilizando um sistema radiográfico digital. As áreas do canal radicular antes (preenchido pelo contraste) e após irrigação (remanescente do contraste) foram submetidas à subtração de imagens no programa Adobe Photoshop CS4 e mensuradas por meio do programa Image Tool 3.0, obtendo o percentual de limpeza e de extrusão. Os dados foram analisados por meio dos testes ANOVA e Tukey, com nível de significância de 5%. Resultado: Não houve diferença estatística entre o diâmetro foraminal, o tipo e a profundidade de penetração da agulha, e a velocidade do fluxo de irrigação nos parâmetros limpeza (acima de 97%) e extrusão apical (menor do que 0,38 mm2), com p>0,05. Conclusão: Todos os protocolos de irrigação avaliados proporcionaram limpeza do canal radicular e pequena extrusão apical da solução irrigadora.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Introduction: The root canal irrigation aims to clean and disinfect the root canal system, without causing apical extrusion. Objective: To evaluate the influence of apical foramen diameter, needle penetration depth and needle design, and the irrigating solution flow rate on the cleaning and apical extrusion. Material and method: Roots of human mandibular incisors with single-canal were instrumented and after enlarged with two different root apical sizes (40 and 60 K-files), the root canals were filled with contrast solution thickened with propylene glycol and zinc oxide. Two types of irrigation needles (27-gauge) with different designs (apical or lateral opening) were used, two flow rates corresponding to 15 or 25 mL/min and needle penetration at two depths (3 and 6 mm from the apex). Before and after irrigation, the teeth were radiographed using a digital radiographic system. Pre-irrigation (canals filled with contrast) and post-irrigation (canals with remaining contrast) images were submitted to digital subtraction using the Adobe Photoshop CS4 software and the areas were measured using the Image Tool 3.0 software, obtaining the percentage of cleaning and extrusion. Data obtained were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests with the significance level of 5%. Result: There was no statistical difference between the apical foramen diameter, needle penetration depth and needle design, and the irrigating solution flow rate on the cleaning results (more than 97%) and the level of apical extrusion (less than 0.38 mm2), (p>0,05). Conclusion: All irrigation protocols evaluated provided cleaning of the root canal and low apical extrusion of irrigating solution.
Keywords
References
1. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54(2):291-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cden.2009.12.001
2. Harrison JW. Irrigation of the root canal system. Dent Clin North Am. 1984;28(4):797-808.
3. Altundasar E, Nagas E, Uyanik O, Serper A. Debris and irrigant extrusion potential of 2 rotary systems and irrigation needles. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112(4):e31-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.03.044
4. Hsieh YD, Gau CH, Kung Wu SF, Shen EC, Hsu PW, Fu E. Dynamic recording of irrigating fluid distribution in root canals using thermal image analysis. Int Endod J. 2007;40(1):11-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01168.x
5. Psimma Z, Boutsioukis C, Kastrinakis E, Vasiliadis L. Effect of needle insertion depth and root canal curvature on irrigant extrusion ex vivo. J Endod. 2013;39(4):521-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.018
6. Mitchell RP, Baumgartner JC, Sedgley CM. Apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite using different root canal irrigation systems. J Endod. 2011;37(12):1677-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.09.004
7. Rodig T, Sedghi M, Konietschke F, Lange K, Ziebolz D, Hulsmann M. Efficacy of syringe irrigation, RinsEndo and passive ultrasonic irrigation in removing debris from irregularities in root canals with different apical sizes. Int Endod J. 2010;43(7):581-9. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01721.x
8. Bronnec F, Bouillaguet S, Machtou P. Ex vivo assessment of irrigant penetration and renewal during the cleaning and shaping of root canals: a digital subtraction radiographic study. Int Endod J. 2010;43(4):275-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01677.x
9. Camoes IC, Salles MR, Fernando MV, Freitas LF, Gomes CC. Relationship between the size of patency file and apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite. Indian J Dent Res. 2009;20(4):426-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.59443
10. Nguy D, Sedgley C. The influence of canal curvature on the mechanical efficacy of root canal irrigation in vitro using real-time imaging of bioluminescent bacteria. J Endod. 2006;32(11):1077-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.04.011
11. Gulabilava K, Patel B, Evans G, Ng YL. Effects of the mechanical and chemical procedures on root canal surfaces. Endod Top. 2005;10(103-122.
12. Zinelis S, Magnissalis EA, Margelos J, Lambrianidis T. Clinical relevance of standardization of endodontic files dimensions according to the ISO 3630-1 specification. J Endod. 2002;28(5):367-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200205000-00005
13. Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Vasiliadis L. Clinical relevance of standardization of endodontic irrigation needle dimensions according to the ISO 9,626:1991 and 9,626:1991/Amd 1:2001 specification. Int Endod J. 2007;40(9):700-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2591.2007.01280.x
14. Desai P, Himel V. Comparative safety of various intracanal irrigation systems. J Endod. 2009;35(4):545-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. joen.2009.01.011
15. Behrents KT, Speer ML, Noujeim M. Sodium hypochlorite accident with evaluation by cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2012;45(5):492-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.02009.x
16. Marins JS, Sassone LM, Fidel SR, Ribeiro DA. In vitro genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in murine fibroblasts exposed to EDTA, NaOCl, MTAD and citric acid. Braz Dent J. 2012;23(5):527-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000500010
17. Crincoli V, Scivetti M, Di Bisceglie MB, Pilolli GP, Favia G. Unusual case of adverse reaction in the use of sodium hypochlorite during endodontic treatment: a case report. Quintessence Int. 2008;39(2):e70-3.
18. Boutsioukis C, Lambrianidis T, Kastrinakis E. Irrigant flow within a prepared root canal using various flow rates: a Computational Fluid Dynamics study. Int Endod J. 2009;42(2):144-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01503.x
19. Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Loiola LE, Morgental RD, Leonardo Rde T, Tanomaru-Filho M. Efficacy of four irrigation needles in cleaning the apical third of root canals. Braz Dent J. 2013;24(1):21-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201302153
20. Tanomaru-Filho M, Bosso R, Sant’Anna-Júnior A, Berbert FLCV, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM. Effectiveness of gutta-percha and Resilon in filling lateral root canals using thermomechanical technique. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2013;42(1):37-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807- 25772013000100007
21. de Gregorio C, Estevez R, Cisneros R, Heilborn C, Cohenca N. Effect of EDTA, sonic, and ultrasonic activation on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2009;35(6):891-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.015
22. de Gregorio C, Estevez R, Cisneros R, Paranjpe A, Cohenca N. Efficacy of different irrigation and activation systems on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals and up to working length: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2010;36(7):1216-21. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.02.019
23. Kositbowornchai S, Hanwachirapong D, Somsopon R, Pirmsinthavee S, Sooksuntisakoonchai N. Ex vivo comparison of digital images with conventional radiographs for detection of simulated voids in root canal filling material. Int Endod J. 2006;39(4):287-92. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01087.x
24. Kullendorff B, Nilsson M, Rohlin M. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996;82(3):344-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80364-7
25. Pace SR, Habitante SM. Comparative analysis of the visualization of small files using digital and conventional radiography. J Appl Oral Sci. 2005;13(1):20-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572005000100005
26. Carvalho FB, Goncalves M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Tanomaru-Filho M. Evaluation of periapical changes following endodontic therapy: digital subtraction technique compared with computerized morphometric analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38(7):438-44. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/53304677
27. Mitchell RP, Yang SE, Baumgartner JC. Comparison of apical extrusion of NaOCl using the EndoVac or needle irrigation of root canals. J Endod. 2010;36(2):338-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.003
28. Shin SJ, Kim HK, Jung IY, Lee CY, Lee SJ, Kim E. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of a new apical negative pressure irrigating system with conventional irrigation needles in the root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109(3):479-84. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.050
29. Nadalin MR, Perez DE, Vansan LP, Paschoala C, Souza-Neto MD, Saquy PC. Effectiveness of different final irrigation protocols in removing debris in flattened root canals. Braz Dent J. 2009;20(3):211-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402009000300007
30. Tasdemir T, Er K, Celik D, Yildirim T. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation on apical extrusion of irrigating solution. Eur J Dent. 2008;2(3):198-203.
31. Psimma Z, Boutsioukis C, Vasiliadis L, Kastrinakis E. A new method for real-time quantification of irrigant extrusion during root canal irrigation ex vivo. Int Endod J. 2013;46(7):619-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iej.12036
32. Verhaagen B, Boutsioukis C, Heijnen GL, van der Sluis LWM, Versluis M. Role of the confinement of a root canal on jet impingement during endodontic irrigation. Exp Fluids. 2012;53(1841-53.
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email