Efeito do desafio ácido nas propriedades superficiais das camadas externa e interna de dentes acrílicos reforçados
Effect of acid challenge on the surface properties of external and internal layers of cross-linked acrylic teeth
Pedro César Garcia de OLIVEIRA, Mariana Pisinato FERREIRA, Alcides Oliveira de MELO, Andréa Lemos Falcão PROCÓPIO, Carolina Yoshi Campos SUGIO, Karin Hermana NEPPELENBROEK
Abstract
Introduction: Artificial acrylic teeth must be resistant to acids for ensure the maintenance of their properties throughout their useful life. However, there are no studies available in the literature about the surface properties of hardness and roughness of the different layers of acrylic resin that make up the artificial teeth submitted to simulated erosion tests. Objective: To evaluate the surface hardness and roughness of external and internal layers of artificial cross-linked acrylic teeth submitted to acid challenge. Methodology: First molars (SR Postaris and Trilux) transversely sectioned had its Vickers hardness and roughness initially evaluated. These tests were repeated after half of the tooth samples (n=10) be immersed into distilled water (control) and half in vinegar during 15 min/day for 28 days. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Result: The initial external layers hardness of both was not significantly altered by acid challenge (p> 0.05) and the immersion in vinegar caused no deleterious effect on the initial internal layers hardness of the two tested teeth (p>0.05). After 28 days, the initial roughness of both teeth evaluated for the two layers was not affected by water or vinegar (p>0.05). Conclusion: The reinforced acrylic teeth were resistant to acid challenge since its internal and external layers showed no significant change in hardness and surface roughness
Keywords
Resumo
Introdução: Os dentes acrílicos artificiais devem apresentar característica de resistência aos ácidos, a fim de assegurar a manutenção de suas propriedades, ao longo de sua vida útil. Entretanto, não há estudos disponíveis na literatura pertinente sobre as propriedades superficiais de dureza e rugosidade das diferentes camadas de resina acrílica que compõem os dentes artificiais submetidos a ensaios de erosão simulada. Objetivo: Avaliar a dureza e rugosidade superficiais das camadas externa e interna de dentes artificiais acrílicos reforçados submetidos a desafio ácido. Metodologia: Molares (SR Postaris e Trilux) seccionados transversalmente foram avaliados inicialmente quanto à dureza Vickers e rugosidade. Esses ensaios foram repetidos após metade das amostras de cada tipo de dente (n=10) ser imersa em água destilada (controle) e outra metade em vinagre durante 15 min/dia por 28 dias. Os resultados foram analisados por ANOVA 2-critérios e teste de Tukey (α=0,05). Resultado: A dureza inicial da camada externa dos dois diferentes tipos de dente não sofreu alteração significativa pelo desafio ácido (p>0,05) e a imersão em vinagre não causou efeito deletério à dureza inicial da camada interna dos dois tipos de dentes avaliados (p>0,05). Após 28 dias, a rugosidade inicial de ambos os tipos de dentes estudados, para as duas camadas, não foi alterada com água ou vinagre (p>0,05). Conclusão: Os dentes acrílicos reforçados foram resistentes ao desafio ácido uma vez que suas camadas interna e externa não apresentaram alteração significativa de dureza e rugosidade superficiais.
Palavras-chave
References
2. Kawano F, Ohguri T, Ichikawa T, Mizuno I, Hasegawa A. Shock absorbability and hardness of commercially available denture teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 May-Jun;15(3):243-7. PMid:12066486.
3. Ghazal M, Albashaireh ZS, Kern M. Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Dec;100(6):441-8. PMid:19033028. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60262-0.
4. Ogle RE, David LJ, Ortman HR. Clinical wear study of a new tooth material: Part II. J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Jul;54(1):67-75. PMid:3894642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(85)80073-1.
5. Adams LP, JoosteCH, ThomasCJ, HarrisAM. Biostereometric quantification of clinical denture tooth wear.J Oral Rehabil. 1996 Oct;23(10):667-74. PMid:8933383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1996.d01-178.x.
6. Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig’s restorative dental materials. 12th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2006.
7. Gregorius WC, Kattadiyil MT, Goodacre CJ, Roggenkamp CL, Powers JM, Paravina RD. Effects of ageing and staining on color of acrylic resin denture teeth. J Dent. 2012 Dec;40(Suppl 2):e47-54. PMid:23007129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.009.
8. Suzuki S. In vitro wear of nano-composite denture teeth. J Prosthodont. 2004 Dec;13(4):238-43. PMid:15610545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04043.x.
9. Whitman DJ, McKinney JE, Hinman RW, Hesby RA, Pelleu GB Jr. In vitro wear rates of three types of commercial denture tooth materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1987 Feb;57(2):243-6. PMid:3470516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90154-5.
10. Telles D. Prótese total – convencional e sobre implantes. São Paulo: Santos; 2010.
11. Imfeld T. Dental erosion. Definition, classification and links. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996 Apr;104(2 Pt 2):151-5. PMid:8804882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00063.x.
12. EcclesJD. Dental erosion of nonindustrial origin. A clinical survey and classification. J Prosthet Dent. 1979 Dec;42(6):649-53. PMid:292776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90196-3.
13. Wu W, McKinney JE. Influence of chemicals on wear of dental composites.J Dent Res. 1982 Oct;61(10):1180-3. PMid:6214572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610101501.
14. Neppelenbroek KH, Kurokawa LA, Procópio AL, Pegoraro TA, Hotta J, Mello Lima JF, et al. Hardness and surface roughness of enamel and base layers of resin denture teeth after long-term repeated chemical disinfection. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Jan;16(1):54-60. PMid:25876951. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1635.
15. Pontefract H, Hughes J, Kemp K, Yates R, Newcombe RG, Addy M. The erosive effects of some mouthrinses on enamel. A study in situ. J Clin Periodontol. 2001 Apr;28(4):319-24. PMid:11314887. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028004319.x.
16. Mahoney E, Holt A, Swain M, Kilpatrick N. The hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary molar teeth: an ultra-micro-indentation study. J Dent. 2000 Nov;28(8):589-94. PMid:11082528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00043-9.
17. Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol. 1995 Jan;22(1):1-14. PMid:7706534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb01765.x.
18. Rahal JS, Mesquita MF, Henriques GE, Nobilo MA. Surface roughness of acrylic resins submitted to mechanical and chemical polishing. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Nov;31(11):1075-9. PMid:15525385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01344.x.
19. Loyaga-Rendon PG, Takahashi H, Hayakawa I, Iwasaki N. Compositional characteristics and hardness of acrylic and composite resin artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Aug;98(2):141-9. PMid:17692595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60047-X.
20. Vasconcelos LR, Consani RL, Mesquita MF, Sinhoreti MA. Effect of chemical and microwave disinfection on the surface microhardness of acrylic resin denture teeth. J Prosthodont. 2013 Jun;22(4):298-303. PMid:23387984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12009.
21. Satoh Y, Nagai E, Maejima K, Azaki M, Matsuzu R, Matsuzu M, et al. Wear of denture teeth by use of metal plates. Part 2: Abrasive wear of posterior teeth. J Nihon Univ Sch Dent. 1992 Mar;34(1):16-27. PMid:1588397. http://dx.doi.org/10.2334/josnusd1959.34.16.
22. Coffey JP, Goodkind RJ, DeLong R, Douglas WH. In vitro study of the wear characteristics of natural and artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1985 Aug;54(2):273-80. PMid:3863936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90304-X.
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email