Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
https://revodontolunesp.com.br/journal/rou/article/doi/10.1590/1807-2577.01416
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Original Article

Is pomegranate peels infusion effective for disinfection of toothbrushes?

A infusão de cascas de romã é efetiva na desinfecção de escovas dentais?

Freire, Priscila Lima de Luna; Campos, Priscila Hernández; Carvalho, Fabíola Galbiatti; Rodrigues, Jonas Almeida; Diniz, Michele Baffi

Downloads: 0
Views: 1040

Abstract

Introduction: Methods of decontamination or sanitization of toothbrushes have been questioned. Objective: This study assessed the effectiveness of pomegranate peels infusion as a disinfectant of toothbrushes against Streptococcus mutans. Material and method: A sample of 16 schoolchildren aged between 7 and 9 years performed brushing 5 days/week, with a careful brushing once a day. After each day of brushing, the toothbrushes were washed and sprayed with one disinfectant solution. This procedure was repeated for 4 weeks using one of the different solutions per week: distilled water (G1; negative control), pomegranate (Punica granatum Linn) peels infusion (G2), 1% sodium hypochlorite (G3) and 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate (G4). After the fifth day, toothbrushes were collected for laboratory analysis. Toothbrushes heads were subjected to agitation in saline dilution of 10–1, 10–2,10–3, and 25 μL of each dilution were seeded in mitis salivarius agar culture medium for S. mutans colony-forming unit (CFU) counting. One calibrated examiner (Kappa = 0.91) performed the CFU (mL–1 × 104) counts. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn Multiple Comparison tests were used at a significance level of 5%. Result: G1 presented the highest number of CFU (3.9 ± 8.4), followed by G2 (3.2 ± 4.0). No S. mutans growth was observed in G3 and G4. There was no statistically significant difference between G1 and G2 and between G3 and G4 (p>0.05). Conclusion: Pomegranate infusion was completely ineffective for the disinfection of toothbrushes against S. mutans when compared with 1% sodium hypochlorite and 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate solutions.

Keywords

Disinfection, toothbrushing, pomegranate, Streptococcus mutans.

Resumo

Introdução: Os métodos de descontaminação ou desinfecção de escovas dentais têm sido questionados. Objetivo: Este estudo avaliou a eficácia da infusão de cascas de romã como um desinfetante de escovas dentais contra Streptococcus mutans. Material e método: Uma amostra de 16 escolares com idade entre 7 e 9 anos realizou escovação dentária cuidadosa, uma vez ao dia por 5 dias/semana durante 4 semanas. Após cada dia de escovação, as escovas foram lavadas e pulverizadas com uma solução desinfetante. Este procedimento foi repetido por 4 semanas utilizando uma das diferentes soluções por semana: água destilada (G1; grupo controle), infusão de casca de romã (Punica granatum Linn) (G2), hipoclorito de sódio a 1% (G3) e digluconato de clorexidina a 0,12% (G4). Após o quinto dia, as escovas foram coletadas para análise laboratorial. As cabeças das escovas foram agitadas em solução salina diluída em 10–1, 10–2,10–3, e 25μL de cada diluição foi semeada em meio de cultura agar mitis salivarius para contagem de unidade formadora de colônias (UFC) de S. mutans. Um examinador calibrado (Kappa = 0,91) realizou a contagem de UFC mL–1 × 104. Os testes de Kruskal-Wallis e de Comparações Múltiplas de Dunn foram usados em um nível de significância de 5%. Resultado: G1 apresentou o maior número de UFC (3,9 ± 8,4), seguido de G2 (3,2 ± 4,0). Não foi observado crescimento de S. mutans em G3 e G4. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre G1 e G2 e entre G3 e G4 (p>0,05). Conclusão: A infusão de romã foi completamente ineficaz para a desinfecção de escovas dentais contra S. mutans quando comparada às soluções de hipoclorito de sódio a 1% e digluconato de clorexidina a 0,12%.

Palavras-chave

Desinfecção, escovação dentária, Punica granatum, Streptococcus mutans.

References

1. Sato S, Ito IY, Lara EH, Panzeri H, Albuquerque RF Jr, Pedrazzi V. Bacterial survival rate on toothbrushes and their decontamination with antimicrobial solutions. J Appl Oral Sci. 2004 Jun;12(2):99-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572004000200003. PMid:21365129.

2. Nelson-Filho P, Faria G, Silva RA, Rossi MA, Ito IY. Evaluation of the contamination and disinfection methods of toothbrushes used by 24- to 48 month-old children. J Dent Child (Chic). 2006 Sep-Dec;73(3):152-8. PMid:17367032.

3. Peker I, Akarslan Z, Basman A, Haciosmanoglu N. Knowledge and behavior of dentists in a dental school regarding toothbrush disinfection. Braz Oral Res. 2015;29(1):48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0048. PMid:25789506.

4. Spolidorio DM, Tardivo TA, Derceli JR, Neppelenbroek KH, Duque C, Spolidorio LC, et al. Evaluation of two alternative methods for disinfection of toothbrushes and tongue scrapers. Int J Dent Hyg. 2011 Nov;9(4):279-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2011.00503.x. PMid:21356033.

5. Chandrdas D, Jayakumar HL, Katodia L, Sreedevi A, Chandra M. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of garlic, tea tree oil, cetylpyridinium chloride, chlorhexidine, and ultraviolet sanitizing device in the decontamination of toothbrush. Indian J Dent. 2014 Oct;5(4):183-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.144718. PMid:25565751.

6. Nascimento C, Trinca NN, Pita MS, Pedrazzi V. Genomic identification and quantification of microbial species adhering to toothbrush bristles after disinfection: a cross-over study. Arch Oral Biol. 2015 Jul;60(7):1039-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.03.012. PMid:25912552.

7. Nabar BM, Pawar PL. Effect of plant extracts formulated in different ointment bases on MDR strains. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2010 May;72(3):397-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.70494. PMid:21188057.

8. Devatkal SK, Jaiswal P, Jha SN, Bharadwaj R, Viswas KN. Antibacterial activity of aqueous extract of pomegranate peel against Pseudomonas stutzeri isolated from poultry meat. J Food Sci Technol. 2013 Jun;50(3):555-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0351-y. PMid:24425952.

9. Jurenka JS. Therapeutic applications of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.): a review. Altern Med Rev. 2008 Jun;13(2):128-44. PMid:18590349.

10. Viuda-Martos M, Fernández-López J, Pérez-Álvarez JA. Pomegranate and its many functional components as related to human health: a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2010 Nov;9(6):635-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00131.x.

11. Qabaha KI. Antimicrobial and free radical scavenging activities of five Palestinian medicinal plants. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2013 May 16;10(4):101-8. eCollection 2013. PMid: 24146509. PMCID: PMC3794399.

12. Abdollahzadeh S, Mashouf R, Mortazavi H, Moghaddam M, Roozbahani N, Vahedi M. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of punica granatum peel extracts against oral pathogens. J Dent (Tehran). 2011;8(1):1-6. PMid:21998800.

13. Vasconcelos LC, Sampaio FC, Sampaio MC, Pereira MS, Higino JS, Peixoto MH. Pereira M do S, Higino JS, Peixoto MH. Minimum inhibitory concentration of adherence of Punica granatum Linn (pomegranate) gel against S. mutans, S. mitis and C. albicans. Braz Dent J. 2006;17(3):223-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402006000300009. PMid:17262129.

14. Pereira JV, Pereira MSV, Sampaio FC, Sampaio MCC, Alves PM, Araújo CRF, et al. Efeito antibacteriano e antiaderente in vitro do extrato da Punica granatum Linn. sobre microrganismos do biofilme dental. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2006 Mar;16(1):88-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2006000100016.

15. Mehta VV, Rajesh G, Rao A, Shenoy R, Pai M. Antimicrobial efficacy of Punica granatum mesocarp, Nelumbo nucifera leaf, Psidium guajava leaf and Coffea Canephora extract on common oral pathogens: an in-vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jul;8(7):ZC65-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/9122.4629. PMid:25177642.

16. De Albuquerque UP, Monteiro JM, Ramos MA, Amorim EL. Medicinal and magic plants from a public Market in northeastern Brazil. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007 Mar;110(1):76-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2006.09.010. PMid:17056216.

17. Tenuta LMA, Lima JEO, Cardoso CL, Tabchoury CPM, Cury JA. Effect of plaque accumulation and salivary factors on enamel demineralization and plaque composition in situ. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003 Dec;17(4):326-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-74912003000400006. PMid:15107914.

18. Dean AG, Sullivan KM, Soe MM. OpenEpi: open source epidemiologic statistics for Public Health [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Feb 1]. Availble from: www.openepi.com

19. Efstratiou M, Papaioannou W, Nakou M, Ktenas E, Vrotsos IA, Panis V. Contamination of a toothbrush with antibacterial properties by oral microorganisms. J Dent. 2007 Apr;35(4):331-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.10.007. PMid:17118507.

20. Fawole OA, Makunga NP, Opara UL. Antibacterial, antioxidant and tyrosinase-inhibition activities of pomegranate fruit peel methanolic extract. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012 Oct;12(1):200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-200. PMid:23110485.

21. Su X, Howell AB, D’Souza DH. Antibacterial effects of plant-derived extracts on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2012 Jun;9(6):573-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2011.1046. PMid:22663188.

22. Nelson Filho P, Macari S, Faria G, Assed S, Ito IY. Microbial contamination of toothbrushes and their decontamination. Pediatr Dent. 2000 Sep-Oct;22(5):381-4. PMid:11048305.

23. Nelson-Filho P, Pereira MS, De Rossi A, Silva RA, Mesquita KS, Queiroz AM, et al. Children’s toothbrush contamination in day-care centers: how to solve this problem? Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Nov;18(8):1969-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1169-y. PMid:24366670.

24. Peker I, Akca G, Sarikir C, Alkurt MT, Celik I. Effectiveness of alternative methods for toothbrush disinfection: an in vitro study. Scientific World Journal. 2014;2014:726190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/726190. PMid: 24971388. PMCID: PMC4058182.

25. Sánchez-Ramírez CA, Larrosa-Haro A, Vásquez Garibay EM, Larios-Arceo F. Caustic ingestion and oesophageal damage in children: clinical spectrum and feeding practices. J Paediatr Child Health. 2011 Jun;47(6):378-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01984.x. PMid:21309879.

26. Jeansonne MJ, White RR. A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants. J Endod. 1994 Jun;20(6):276-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80815-0. PMid:7931023.

27. Nascimento AP, Faria G, Watanabe E, Ito IY. Efficacy of mouthrinse spray in inhibiting cariogenic biofilm formation on toothbrush bristles. Braz J Oral Sci. 2008 Jan-Mar;7(24):1489-92.

28. Komiyama EY, Back-Brito GN, Balducci I, Koga-Ito CY. Evaluation of alternative methods for the disinfection of toothbrushes. Braz Oral Res. 2010 Jan-Mar;24(1):28-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242010000100005. PMid:20339710.

588019e87f8c9d0a098b53c0 rou Articles
Links & Downloads

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Share this page
Page Sections