Associations between orbicularis oris thickness and skeletal and dental variables in mixed dentition
Associações entre espessura do orbicularis oris e variáveis esqueléticas e dentárias na dentição mista
Barbosa, Taís de Souza; Gavião, Maria Beatriz Duarte; Pupo, Luciana Silveira; Castelo, Paula Midori; Pereira, Luciano José
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-25772012000600006
Rev. odontol. UNESP, vol.41, n6, p.402-407, 2012
Abstract
To evaluate the association between orbicularis oris thickness and skeletal and dental variables in children with mixed dentition. Material and method: A convenience sample of 22 children, aged 7 to 12 years, with skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusion and subdivisions were selected. The upper and lower fascicles of the orbicularis oris thicknesses were measured using ultrasound (US) by one calibrated examiner, at rest and in the contracted state. Cephalometric radiograph measurements of the hard and soft tissues were calculated by one trained examiner. The results were analyzed by the Pearson and Spearman coefficients. Result: The upper and lower fascicles of the orbicularis oris in the contracted state showed a negative correlation with the distance between Ricketts’ E-line and the labrale superius (E ┴ Ls). There were positive correlations between the lower face height and the distance between the AB plane and the labrale superius (AB-Ls) and between the ANB angle and the distance between E ┴ Ls and Ricketts’ E-line and the labrale inferius (E ┴ Li). The lower-incisor distance from the N-Pg plane correlated positively with the distance between AB-Ls and the distance between the E ┴ Ls and E ┴ Li. Overbite and interincisal angle were negatively correlated with the distance between the pogonion and the soft tissue pogonion and the distance between E ┴ Li, respectively. Conclusion: Skeletal and dental variables were associated with upper and lower lip position and pogonion thickness, while the upper and lower fascicles of the orbicularis oris thicknesses in the contracted state were associated only with upper lip retrusion.
Keywords
Cephalometry, child, malocclusion, ultrasonography.
Resumo
Verificar a associação entre a espessura do orbicularis oris e as variáveis esqueléticas e dentárias em crianças com dentição mista. Material e método: Foi selecionada uma amostra de conveniência de 22 crianças, de 7 a 12 anos, com maloclusões Classe I e Classe II esqueléticas e subdivisões. As espessuras dos fascículos superior e inferior do orbicularis oris foram mensuradas, em repouso e em contração, por um examinador treinado utilizando ultrassom. As medidas cefalométricas dos tecidos duros e moles foram calculadas por um examinador treinado. Os resultados foram analisados pelos coeficientes de Pearson e Spearman. Resultado: Houve correlação negativa entre os fascículos superior e inferior do orbicularis oris em contração e a distância entre a linha E de Ricketts e o lábio superior (E ┴ Ls). Houve correlação positiva entre a altura inferior da face e a distância entre o plano AB e o lábio superior (AB-Ls) e entre o ângulo ANB e a distância entre E ┴ Ls e a linha E de Ricketts e o lábio inferior (E ┴ Li). A distância do incisivo inferior do plano N-Pg correlacionou-se positivamente com a distância entre AB-Ls e a distância entre E ┴ Ls e E ┴ Li. A sobremordida e o ângulo interincisal correlacionaram-se negativamente com a distância entre o pogônio e o pogônio mole e a distância entre E ┴ Li, respectivamente. Conclusão: As variáveis esqueléticas e dentárias estiveram associadas à posição dos lábios superior e inferior e a espessura do pogônio, enquanto que as espessuras dos fascículos superior e inferior do orbicularis oris em contração estiveram associadas à retrusão do lábio superior.
Palavras-chave
Cefalometria, criança, má oclusão, ultrassonografia.
References
1. Jung MH, Yang WS, Nahm DS. Effects of upper lip closing force on craniofacial structures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:58‑63. PMid:12532064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mod.2003.54
2. Zide BM. The mentalis action: an essential component of chin and lower lip position. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:1213-5. PMid:10724283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200003000-00061
3. Wolff J. Über die innere architectur der knochen und ihre bedeutung für die frage vom knochenwachshum. Virchow's Archiv. 1870;50:389‑450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01944490
4. Kitai N, Fujii Y, Murakami S, Furukawa S, Kreiborg S, Takada K. Human masticatory muscle volume and zygomatico-mandibular form in adults with mandibular prognathism. J Dent Res. 2002;81:752-6. PMid:12407089. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154405910208101106
5. Oliver BM. The influence of lip thickness and strain on upper lip response to incisor retraction. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:141-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90492-4
6. Wisth PJ. Soft tissue response to upper incisor retraction in boys. Br J Orthod. 1974;1:199-204. PMid:4532612.
7. Ikai M, Fukunaga T. A study on training effect on strength per unit cross-sectional area of muscle by means of ultrasonic measurement. Int Z Angew Physiol. 1970;28:173-80. PMid:5425330.
8. Bakke M, Tuxen A, Vilmann P, Jensen BR, Vilmann A, Toft M. Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors. Scand J Dent Res. 1992;100:164-71. PMid:1631486.
9. Martin RA, Hunter V, Neufeld-Kaiser W, Flodman P, Spence MA, Furnas D et al. Ultrasonographic detection of orbicularis oris defects in first degree relatives of isolated cleft lip patients. Am J Med Genet. 2000;90:155-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(20000117)90:2<155::AID-AJMG13>3.0.CO;2-V
10. Kumar TV, Kuriakose S. Ultrasonographic evaluation of effectiveness of circumoral muscle exercises in adenotonsillectomized children. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2004;29:49-55. PMid:15554404.
11. van Hees NJ, Thijssen JM, Huyskens RW, Weijers G, Nillesen MM, de Korte CL, et al. Quantitative ultrasound imaging of healthy and reconstructed cleft lip: a feasibility study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007;44:261-8. PMid:17477756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/06-051
12. Kilic N. Associations between upper lip activity and incisor position. Aust Orthod J. 2010;26:56-60. PMid:20575201.
13. Rasheed SA, Munshi AK. Electromyographic and ultrasonographic evaluation of the circum-oral musculature in children. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1996;20:305-11. PMid:9151623.
14. Castelo PM, Gavião MB, Pereira LJ, Bonjardim LR. Masticatory muscle thickness, bite force, and occlusal contacts in young children with unilateral posterior crossbite. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:149-56. PMid:17317862. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjl089
15. Andrade AS, Gavião MB, Derossi M, Gameiro GH. Electromyographic activity and thickness of masticatory muscles in children with unilateral posterior crossbite. Clin Anat. 2009;22:200-6. PMid:19031391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.20726
16. Akyalçin S, Hazar S, Güneri P, Gögüs S, Erdinç AM. Extraction versus non-extraction: evaluation by digital subtraction radiography. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:639-47. PMid:17906308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm075
17. Khan M, Fida M. Soft tissue profile response in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010;20:454-9. PMid:20642945.
18. Battagel JM. Profile changes in Class II, division 1 malocclusions: a comparison of the effects of Edgewise and Fränkel appliance therapy. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11:243-53. PMid:2792214.
19. Zierhut EC, Joondeph DR, Artun J, Little RM. Long-term profile changes associated with successfully treated extraction and nonextraction Class II Division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:208-19. PMid:10926430.
20. Sodagar A, Borujeni DG, Amini G. Prediction of soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic retraction of incisors in Iranian girls. World J Orthod. 2010;11:262-8. PMid:20877736.
21. Blanchette ME, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Ghosh J, Nanda SK. A longitudinal cephalometric study of the soft tissue profile of short- and long-face syndromes from 7 to 17 years. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:116-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70172-5
22. Boneco C, Jardim L. Estudo da morfologia labial em pacientes com padrão facial vertical alterado. Rev Port Estom Med Dent Cir Maxilofac. 2005;46:69-80.
23. Tsang WM, Cheung LK, Samman N. Cephalometric characteristics of anterior open bite in a southern Chinese population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:165-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70288-4
24. Anić Miloević S, laj M, Lapter Varga M. Osnovna načela snimanja ekstraoralnih fotografija (Basic Principles for Taking Extraoral Photographs). Acta Stomatologica Croatica. 2005; 39:195-205.
25. Kasai K. Soft tissue adaptability to hard tissues in facial profiles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:674-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70228-8
26. Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR, Zaher AR. Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107:28-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70154-0
27. Ambrosio AR, Trevilatto PC, Sakima T, Ignácio SA, Shimizu RH. Correlation between morphology and function of the upper lip: a longitudinal evaluation. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31:306-13. PMid:19289538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn112
28. Capaccioli L, Antonini A, Franchi L, Tollaro I, Zecchi Orlandini S, Stecco A, Villari N. The correlations between the echographic aspect of the perioral and masticatory muscles and dento-skeletal characteristics. Radiol Med. 1998;95:567-72.
29. Simpson MM. Lip incompetence and its relationship to skeletal and dental morphology - an electromyographic investigation. Br J Orthod. 1976;3:177-9. PMid:1067870.
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email