Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
https://revodontolunesp.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/1807-2577.16316
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Original Article

Cytotoxicity of three light-cured resin cements on 3T3 fibroblasts

Citotoxicidade de três cimentos resinosos fotopolimerizáveis sobre fibroblastos 3T3

Daniela Bastos Tumscitz, Laisa Araujo Cortines Laxe, Aislan Cristina Rheder Fagundes Pascoal, Raphael Hirata Junior, Renata Ximenes Lins

Downloads: 3
Views: 1068

Abstract

Introduction: Light-cured resin cements are the first choice for the cementation of laminate veneers. Ideally, they should be biocompatible and offer minimum risks to patients. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the cytotoxicity of three resin cements: Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent (C1), Allcem Veneer, FGM (C2), and Rely X Veneer, 3M ESPE (C3). Material and method: Twenty four samples of each of the cements were fabricated in a standardized metal mold, light activated, and transferred to a 96-well cell plate with culture of fibroblasts. After 24, 48, and 72h of incubation, cytotoxicity was assessed and cell viability was calculated by the methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium (MTT) colorimetric assay. Absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a microplate spectrophotometer. Result: The following results were found: Variolink II presented viability of 72.24% (SD 6.80) after 24h, 83.92% (SD 5.26) after 48h, and 92.77% (SD 5.59) after 72h; Allcem Veneer exhibited viability of 70.46% (SD 12.91) after 24h, 85.03% (SD 21.4) after 48h, and 70.46% (SD 12.91) after 72h; Rely X Veneer showed viability of 5.06% (SD 0.88) after 24h, 5.84% (SD 1.18) after 48h, and 6.99% (SD 1.34) after 72h. Conclusion: Under these testing conditions, Rely X Veneer presented significantly higher cytotoxicity compared with those of the other light-cured resin cements assessed.

Keywords

Dental veneers; resin cements; cytotoxicity; composite resins; cell survival.

Resumo

Introdução: Cimentos resinosos fotopolimerizáveis são materiais de eleição para a cimentação de facetas laminadas. Devem ser biocompatíveis oferencendo riscos mínimos ao uso clínico em pacientes. Objetivo: O objetivo desse trabalho foi avaliar in vitro a citotoxicidade de três cimentos resinosos: Variolink II (Ivoclar Vivadent), Allcem Veneer, (FGM) e Rely X Veneer (3M ESPE). Material e método: Vinte e quatro corpos de prova de cada cimento foram confeccionados em matrizes metálicas padronizadas e inseridos em placa de cultura de células de noventa e seis poços contendo fibroblastos da linhagem 3T3. As células foram cultivadas em meio de cultivo celular RPMI 1640 com 5% de soro fetal bovino, com 0,1% de penicilina/estreptomicina em estufa a 37°C, em atmosfera úmida com 5% de CO2. O grau de citotoxicidade de cada cimento foi avaliado após os tempos de contato de 24h, 48h e 72h através do método MTT (3-(4,5-dimetiltiazol-2yl)-2,5- difenil brometo de tetrazolina), que avalia a viabilidade celular pela função mitocondrial. Após os tempos estabelecidos, as amostras foram removidas, tratadas e levadas ao espectofotômetro de microplaca para leitura da absorbância em 570nm. Resultado: O cimento Variolink apresentou em 24h viabilidade de 72,24% (±6,80), em 48h de 83,92% (± 5,26) e de 92,77% (±5,59) em 72h. Allcem Veneer apresentou viabilidade de 70,46% (± 12,91) em 24h; 85,03% (± 21,4) em 48h e 70,46% (± 12,91) em 72h. O RelyX Veneer demonstrou viabilidade de 5,06% (± 0,88) em 24h; 5,84% (± 1,18) em 48h e 6,99% (± 1,34) em 72h. Conclusão: Estes resultados demonstraram que o cimento Rely-X se apresentou significativamente mais citotóxico nas condições testadas.

Palavras-chave

Facetas dentárias; cimentos de resina; citotoxicidade; resinas compostas; sobrevivência celular.

References

1. Silami FDJ, Tonani R, Alandia-Román CC, Pires-de-Souza FCP. Influence of different types of resin luting agents on color stability of ceramic laminate veneers subjected to accelerated artificial aging. Braz Dent J. 2016 Feb;27(1):95-100. PMid:27007354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201600348.

2. Cunha LF, Pedroche LO, Gonzaga CC, FuruseAY. Esthetic, occlusal, and periodontal rehabilitation of anterior teeth with minimum thickness porcelain laminate veneer. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Dec;112(6):1315-8. PMid:25156092. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.028.

3. Schmid-Schwap M, Franz A, König F, Bristela M, Lucas T, Piehslinger E, et al. Citotoxicity of four categories of dental cements. Dent Mater. 2009 Mar;25(3):360-8. PMid:18849067. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.08.002.

4. Geurtsen W, Lehmann F, Spahl W, Leyhausen G. Cytotoxicity of 35 dental resin composite monomers / additives in permanent 3T3 and three human primary fibroblast cultures. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998 Sep;41(3):474-80. PMid:9659618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980905)41:3<474::AID-JBM18>3.0.CO;2-I.

5. Ladha K, Verma M. Conventional and contemporary luting cements: an overview. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010 Jun;10(2):79-88. PMid:21629449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13191-010-0022-0.

6. Kong N, Jiang T, Zhou Z, Fu J. Cytotoxicity of polymerized resin cements on human dental pulp cells in vitro. Dent Mater. 2009 Nov;25(11):1371-5. PMid:19615734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.008.

7. D’Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, Vadini M, D’Amario M. Clinical evaluation on porcelain laminate veneers bonded with light-cured composite: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Aug;16(4):1071-9. PMid:21773711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0593-0.

8. Arslan Malkoç M, Demir N, Şengün A, Bozkurt ŞB, Hakki SS. Cytotoxicity evaluation of luting resin cements on bovine dental pulp-derived cells (bDPCs) by real-time cell analysis. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(2):154-60. PMid:25736260. http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-167.

9. Delaviz Y, Finer Y, Santerre JP. Biodegradation of resin composites and adhesives by oral bacteria and saliva: a rationale for new material designs that consider the clinical environment and treatment challenges. Dent Mater. 2014 Jan;30(1):16-32. PMid:24113132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.201.

10. Gupta SK, Saxena P, Pant VA, PantAB. Release and toxicity of dental resin composite. Toxicol Int. 2012 Sep-Dec;19(3):225-34. PMid:23293458. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6580.103652.

11. Noronha JD Fo, Brandão NL, Poskus LT, Guimarães JGA, Silva EM. A critical analysis of the degree of conversion of resin-based luting cements. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Sep-Oct;18(5):442-6. PMid:21085798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000500003.

12. Yalcin M, Ahmetoglu F, Sisman R, Bozkurt BS, Hakki S. Cytotoxicity of low-shrink composites with new monomer technology onbovine dental pulp-derived cells. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2015 Jan;34(1):93-9. PMid:24854397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0960327113497773.

13. Fonseca Roberti Garcia L, Pontes EC, Basso FG, Hebling J, Souza Costa CA, Soares DG. Transdentinal cytotoxicity of resin-based luting cements to pulp cells. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Sep;20(7):1559-66. PMid:26481234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1630-1.

14. Yildirim-Bicer AZ, Ergun G, Egilmez F, Demirkoprulu H. In vitro cytotoxicity of indirect composite resins: Effect of storing in artificial saliva. Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):81-6. PMid:23852238. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.114962.

15. Ferracane JL. Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can’t predict? Dent Mater. 2013 Jan;29(1):51-8. PMid:22809582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.06.013.

16. De Deus G, Ximenes R, Gurgel-Filho ED, Plotkowski MC, Coutinho-Filho T. Cytotoxicity of MTA and Portland cement on human ECV 304 endothelial cells. Int Endod J. 2005 Sep;38(9):604-9. PMid:16104973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00987.x.

17. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983 Dec;65(1-2):55-63. PMid:6606682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4.

18. Trumpaite-Vanagiene R, Bukelskiene V, Aleksejuniene J, Puriene A, Baltriukiene D, Rutkunas V. Cytotoxicity of commonly used luting cements - an in vitro study. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(3):294-301. PMid:25904168. http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-185.

19. Hass V, Luque-Martinez IV, Gutierrez MF, Moreira CG, Gotti VB, Feitosa VP, et al. Collagen cross-linkers on dentin bonding: stability of the adhesive interfaces, degree of conversion of the adhesive, cytotoxicity and in situ MMP inhibition. Dent Mater. 2016 Jun;32(6):732-41. PMid:27087688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.008.

20. Mahasti S, Sattari M, Romoozi E, Akbar-Zadeh Baghban A. Cytotoxicity comparison of harvard zinc phosphate cement versus Panavia F2 and Rely X Plus resin cements on Rat L929-fibroblasts. Cell J. 2011;13(3):163-8. PMid:23508355.

59a7fbbd0e8825f53e79dc96 rou Articles
Links & Downloads

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Share this page
Page Sections