Desempenho de métodos baseados em indução de fluorescência na avaliação da remoção de dentina cariada
Performance of fluorescence-based methods in evaluating dentin caries removal
Boldieri, Thalita; Diniz, Michele Baffi; Sanabe, Mariane Emi; Rodrigues, Jonas Almeida; Cordeiro, Rita de Cássia Loiola
Resumo
Introdução: Critérios clínicos vêm sendo utilizados para determinação da presença de tecido cariado remanescente, mas geram dúvidas, tornando-se relevante a utilização de métodos que auxiliem na determinação da presença de cárie dentária remanescente. Objetivo: Avaliar in vitro a eficácia de métodos de indução de fluorescência no diagnóstico da remoção de tecido cariado artificial dentinário. Material e método: O esmalte oclusal de 94 terceiros molares humanos hígidos foi removido, expondo a dentina subjacente, para indução microbiológica de lesão de cárie artificial. Após a remoção do tecido cariado induzido, o remanescente dentinário foi avaliado por dois examinadores com DIAGNOdent, DIAGNOdent pen e Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence (QLF). Após todas as avaliações, secções dos dentes foram observadas e fotografadas em lupa estereoscópica com 30× de aumento por um examinador independente. As imagens foram analisadas no software Image J, permitindo a quantificação de tecido remanescente em milímetros quadrados. Foi calculada a reprodutibilidade interexaminador através de coeficiente intraclasse, sensibilidade, especificidade e área sob a curva ROC, e o teste de McNemar (p<0,05) foi aplicado para comparação dos diferentes métodos. Resultado: Dos 94 dentes, 51 (54,2%) apresentaram remanescente de tecido cariado. Os valores de sensibilidade, especificidade e área sobre a curva ROC foram semelhantes para os três grupos (p>0,05). Os valores de reprodutibilidade variaram entre 0,952 e 0,978. Conclusão: Dentre os métodos utilizados, o DIAGNOdent e o DIAGNOdent pen apresentaram melhor desempenho na avaliação da presença de cárie artificial remanescente quando comparados ao QLF.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical criteria have been used for the determination of the presence of residual caries, however in a subjective manner. Then the use of auxiliary methods that assist in determination of the remaining presence of caries can be considered for this purpose. Objective: Evaluate the in “in vitro” efficacy fluorescence induction methods in the diagnosis of removing artificial dentinal caries. Material and method: Ninety-four thirds sound human molars without occlusal enamel were used for microbiological artificial caries lesion induction. The decayed tissue was removed and the remaining dentin evaluated by two examiners with DIAGNOdent, DIAGNOdent pen and Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence - QLF. After all assessments, sections of the specimens were observed and photographed in stereoscopic lens with 30× increase by an independent examiner. These images were analyzed with Image J software, allowing quantitation of remaining caries tissue in mm2. The inter-examiner reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve was calculated and the McNemar test (p<0.05) was used to compare the different among methods. Result: Of the 94 teeth, 51 (54.2%) had residual caries. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve were similar for the three methods (p>0.05). The inter-examiner agreement ranged between 0.952 and 0.978. Conclusion: Among the methods used, the DIAGNOdent, DIAGNOdent pen showed better performance in residual caries detection after dentin caries removal when compared to QLF.
Keywords
References
1. Fusayama T. Two layers of carious dentin; diagnosis and treatment. Oper Dent. 1979;4(2):63-70. PMid:296808.
2. Thompson V, Craig RG, Curro FA, Green WS, Ship JA. Treatment of deep carious lesions by complete excavation or partial removal: a critical review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Jun;139(6):705-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0252. PMid:18519994.
3. Maltz M, Alves LS. Incomplete caries removal significantly reduces the risk of pulp exposure and post-operative pulpal symptoms. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2013 Sep;13(3):120-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2013.07.014. PMid:24011012.
4. Maltz M, Oliveira EF, Fontanella V, Carminatti G. Deep caries lesions after incomplete dentine caries removal: 40-month follow-up study. Caries Res. 2007;41(6):493-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000109349. PMid:17921671.
5. Souza JF, Boldieri T, Diniz MB, Rodrigues JA, Lussi A, Cordeiro RCL. Traditional and novel methods for occlusal caries detection: performance on primary teeth. Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Jan;28(1):287-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1154-8. PMid:22767324.
6. Diniz MB, Rodrigues JA, Paula AB, Cordeiro Rde C. In vivo evaluation of laser fluorescence performance using different cut-off limits for occlusal caries detection. Lasers Med Sci. 2009 May;24(3):295-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-008-0547-1. PMid:18311473.
7. Iwami Y, Shimizu A, Hayashi M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Relationship between colors of carious dentin and laser fluorescence evaluations in caries diagnosis. Dent Mater J. 2006 Sep;25(3):584-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.584. PMid:17076331.
8. Krause F, Braun A, Eberhard J, Jepsen S. Laser fluorescence measurements compared to electrical resistance of residual dentine in excavated cavities in vivo. Caries Res. 2007;41(2):135-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000098047. PMid:17284915.
9. Neves AA, Coutinho E, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Does DIAGNOdent provide a reliable caries-removal endpoint? J Dent. 2011 May;39(5):351-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.02.005. PMid:21334416.
10. Gomez J, Pretty IA, Santarpia RP 3rd, Cantore B, Rege A, Petrou I, et al. Quantitative light-induced fluorescence to measure enamel remineralization in vitro. Caries Res. 2014;48(3):223-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000354655. PMid:24481051.
11. Pretty IA, Edgar WM, Higham SM. Detection of in vitro demineralization of primary teeth using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF). Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002 May;12(3):158-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263X.2002.00357.x. PMid:12028307.
12. Ando M, González-Cabezas C, Isaacs RL, Eckert GJ, Stookey GK. Evaluation of several techniques for the detection of secondary caries adjacent to amalgam restorations. Caries Res. 2004 Jul-Aug;38(4):350-6. PMid: 15181334.
13. Restrepo M, Bussaneli DG, Jeremias F, Cordeiro RCL, Magalhães AC, Spolidorio DMP, et al. Control of white spot lesion adjacent to orthodontic bracket with use of fluoride varnish or chlorhexidine gel. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/218452. PMid:25973442.
14. Diniz MB, Sciasci P, Rodrigues JA, Lussi A, Cordeiro RC. Influence of different professional prophylactic methods on fluorescence measurements for detection of occlusal caries. Caries Res. 2011;45(3):264-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000326110. PMid:21576958.
15. Francescut P, Zimmerli B, Lussi A. Influence of different storage methods on laser fluorescence values: a two-year study. Caries Res. 2006;40(3):181-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000092223. PMid:16707864.
16. Lenzi TL, Calvo AFB, Tedesco TK, Ricci HA, Hebling J, Raggio DP. Effect of method of caries induction on aged resin-dentin bond of primary teeth. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15(1):79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0049-z. PMid:26163387.
17. de Carvalho FG, Puppin-Rontani RM, Soares LE, Santo AM, Martin AA, Nociti-Junior FH. Mineral distribution and CLSM analysis of secondary caries inhibition by fluoride/MDPB-containing adhesive system after cariogenic challenges. J Dent. 2009 Apr;37(4):307-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.12.006. PMid:19168273.
18. Hosoya Y, Taguchi T, Tay FR. Evaluation of a new caries detecting dye for primary and permanent carious dentin. J Dent. 2007 Feb;35(2):137-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.06.004. PMid:16945461.
19. Bussaneli DG, Restrepo M, Boldieri T, Pretel H, Mancini MW, Santos-Pinto L, et al. Assessment of a new infrared laser transillumination technology (808 nm) for the detection of occlusal caries-an in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Sep;30(7):1873-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1704-3. PMid:25549960.
20. Alammari MR, Smith PW, de Josselin de Jong E, Higham SM. Quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF): a tool for early occlusal dental caries detection and supporting decision making in vivo. J Dent. 2013 Feb;41(2):127-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.013. PMid:22940557.
21. Diniz MB, Leme AF, Cardoso KS, Rodrigues Jde A, Cordeiro Rde C. The efficacy of laser fluorescence to detect in vitro demineralization and remineralization of smooth enamel surfaces. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009 Feb;27(1):57-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pho.2007.2230. PMid:19182974.
22. Diniz MB, Boldieri T, Rodrigues JA, Santos-Pinto L, Lussi A, Cordeiro RC. The performance of conventional and fluorescence-based methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vivo study with histologic validation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Apr;143(4):339-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0176. PMid:22467694.
23. Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Diniz MB, Lussi A. Performance of fluorescence methods, radiographic examination and ICDAS II on occlusal surfaces in vitro. Caries Res. 2008;42(4):297-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000148162. PMid:18663299.
24. Rodrigues JA, Diniz MB, Josgrilberg EB, Cordeiro RC. In vitro comparison of laser fluorescence performance with visual examination for detection of occlusal caries in permanent and primary molars. Lasers Med Sci. 2009 Jul;24(4):501-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-008-0552-4. PMid:18373155.
25. Rodrigues JA, Neuhaus KW, Diniz MB, Hug I, Stich H, Karlsson L, et al. Comparison among gold standard techniques used for the validation of methods for occlusal caries detection. Microsc Res Tech. 2012 May;75(5):605-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jemt.21097. PMid:22021193.
26. Iwami Y, Yamamoto H, Hayashi M, Ebisu S. Relationship between laser fluorescence and bacterial invasion in arrested dentinal carious lesions. Lasers Med Sci. 2011 Jul;26(4):439-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0798-5. PMid:20535516.
27. Unlu N, Ermis RB, Sener S, Kucukyilmaz E, Cetin AR. An in vitro comparison of different diagnostic methods in detection of residual dentinal caries. Int J Dent. 2010;2010:864935. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/864935.
28. Yazici AR, Baseren M, Gokalp S. The in vitro performance of laser fluorescence and caries-detector dye for detecting residual carious dentin during tooth preparation. Quintessence Int. 2005 Jun;36(6):417-22. PMid:15954247.
29. Mattos J, Soares GM, Ribeiro AA. Current status of conservative treatment of deep carious lesions. Dent Update. 2014 Jun;41(5):452-4, 456. PMid:25073228.
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email