Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
https://revodontolunesp.com.br/article/doi/10.1590/1807-2577.06717
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP
Original Article

Fluoride release and surface roughness of a new glass ionomer cement: glass carbomer

Liberação de flúor e rugosidade superficial de um novo cimento de ionômero de vidro: glass carbomer

Célia Maria Condeixa de França LOPES; Jessica GALVAN; Ana Claudia Rodrigues CHIBINSKI; Denise Stadler WAMBIER

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.06717 Rev. odontol. UNESP, vol.47, n1, p.1-6, 2018
PDF
Downloads: 1
Views: 1042

Abstract

Objective: This study analyzed the fluoride release/recharge and surface roughness of glass carbomer compared to other encapsulated glass ionomer cements (GICs).

Material and method: The GICs tested were Glass Fill® (GC-GCP Dental), Riva Self Cure® (RS-SDI), Riva Light Cure® (RL-SDI), Equia Fil® (EF-GC Europe). The composite resin Luna® (LU-SDI) was used as control. Five samples of each material were prepared and kept in a humidifier for 24 hours (37 °C, 100% relative humidity). Fluoride release was measured in two times: before (T1: days 1, 2, 7, 14) and after topical application of fluoride (T2: days 15, 16, 21 and 28). The surface roughness was also measured in both times (T1: days 1 and 14; T2: days 15 and 28). All samples were submitted to a single topical application of acidulated fluoride phosphate (Fluor Care - FGM). Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures and Tukey's post-test (p <0.05) were used in the statistical analysis.

Result: Equia Fil presented the highest fluoride release in both evaluation periods, with a higher release in T1 (p <0.05). The other materials tested, including glass carbomer presented similar release in both periods (T1 and T2). Regarding surface roughness, no significant differences were observed in the interaction between the material × time factors (T1 and T2) (p=0.966).

Conclusion: The GICs tested presented fluoride release and recharge ability and showed no surface roughness increase by topical application of fluoride.

Keywords

Glass ionomer cements, dental materials, fluoride

Resumo

Objetivo: Este estudo analisou a liberação/recarga de flúor e a rugosidade superficial do carbômero de vidro em comparação a outros cimentos de ionômero vidro (CIVs) encapsulados.

Material e método: Os CIVs testados foram o Glass Fill® (GC-GCP Dental), Riva Self Cure® (RS-SDI), Riva Light Cure® (RL-SDI), Equia Fil® (EF-GC Europe). A resina composta Luna® (LU-SDI) foi empregada como controle. Cinco amostras de cada material foram confeccionadas e mantidas em um umidificador durante 24h (37 °C, 100% de umidade relativa). A liberação de flúor foi aferida em dois tempos: antes (T1: dias 1, 2, 7 e 14) e após aplicação tópica de flúor (T2: dias 15, 16, 21 e 28). A rugosidade superficial também foi aferida nos dois tempos (T1: dias 1 e14; T2: dias 15 e 28). Todas as amostras foram submetidas a uma única aplicação tópica de flúor fosfato acidulado (Flúor Care - FGM). ANOVA dois fatores com medidas repetidas e pós-teste de Tukey (p<0,05) foram empregados na analise estatística.

Resultado: O Equia Fil apresentou a maior liberação de flúor em ambos os períodos de avaliação, com liberação maior no T1 (p<0,05). Os demais materiais testados, incluindo o carbômero de vidro, apresentaram liberação semelhante em ambos os períodos (T1 e T2). Em relação à rugosidade superficial não foram observadas diferenças significativas na interação entre os fatores material × tempo (T1 e T2) (p=0,966).

Conclusão: Os CIVs testados apresentaram capacidade de liberação e recarga de flúor e não mostraram aumento de rugosidade superfícial pela aplicação tópica de flúor.
 

Palavras-chave

Cimento de ionômero de vidro, materiais dentários, flúor

References

Lippert F, Hara AT, Martinez-Mier EA, Zero DT. In vitro caries lesion rehardening and enamel fluoride uptake from fluoride varnishes as a function of application mode. Am J Dent. 2013 Apr;26(2):81-5. PMid:24073530.

Smales RJ, Gao W. In vitro caries inhibition at the enamel margins of glass ionomer restoratives developed for the ART approach. J Dent. 2000 May;28(4):249-56. PMid:10722898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00071-8.

Markovic DL, Petrovic BB, Peric TO. Fluoride content and recharge ability of five glassionomer dental materials. BMC Oral Health. 2008 Jul;8(1):21. PMid:18655734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-8-21.

Bertolini MJ, Zaghete MA, Gimenes R, Padovani GC, Cruz CA. Preparation and evaluation of an experimental luting glass ionomer cement to be used in dentistry. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009 Sep;20(9):1781-5. PMid:19415231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-009-3748-7.

Preston AJ, Higham SM, Agalamanyi EA, Mair LH. Fluoride recharge of aesthetic dental materials. J Oral Rehabil. 1999 Dec;26(12):936-40. PMid:10620157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00502.x.

Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials-fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007 Mar;23(3):343-62. PMid:16616773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022.

Cehreli ZC, Yazici R, García-Godoy F. Effect of 1.23 percent APF gel on fluoride-releasing restorative materials. ASDC J Dent Child. 2000 Sep-Oct;67(5):330-7, 302. PMid:11068665.

Arslanoglu Z, Altan H, Sahin O, Tekin MG, Adigüzel M. Evaluation of surface properties of four tooth-colored restorative materials. Acta Phys Pol A. 2015;128(2B):310-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-310.

Cehreli SB, Tirali RE, Yalcinkaya Z, Cehreli ZC. Microleakage of newly developed glass carbomer cement in primary teeth. Eur J Dent. 2013 Jan;7(1):15-21. PMid:23408469.

Lopes CMCF, Schubert EW, Reis A, Wambier DS. Análise da dureza de um novo material restaurador para ART: Glass Carbomer. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2016 Abr;45(2):65-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.10915.

Menne-Happ U, Ilie N. Effect of gloss and heat on the mechanical behaviour of a glass carbomer cement. J Dent. 2013 Mar;41(3):223-30. PMid:23174652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.005.

Chen X, Du MQ, Fan MW, Mulder J, Huysmans MCDNJM, Frencken JE. Caries preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years. Dent Mater. 2012 May;28(5):554-60. PMid:22300651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.01.001.

Koenraads H, Van der Kroon G, Frencken JE. Compressive strength of two newly developed glass-ionomer materials for use with the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach in class II cavities. Dent Mater. 2009 Apr;25(4):551-6. PMid:19211138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.12.008.

Woolford MJ, Grieve AR. Release of fluoride from glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement subjected to radiante heat. J Dent. 1995 Aug;23(4):233-7. PMid:7629328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)91188-S.

Dionysopoulos D, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Helvatzoglou-Antoniades M, Kotsanos N. Fluoride release and recharge abilities of contemporary fluoride-containing restorative materials and dental adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(2):296-304. PMid:23538766. http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2012-144.

Xu X, Burgess JO. Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials. Biomaterials. 2003 Jun;24(14):2451-61. PMid:12695072. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00638-5.

Kamatham R, Reddy SJ. Surface coatings on glass ionomer restorations in Pediatric dentistry-Worthy or not? J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2013 Oct-Dec;31(4):229-33. PMid:24262395. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.121818.

De Moor RJ, Verbeeck RM, De Maeyer EA. Fluoride release profiles of restorative glass ionomer formulations. Dent Mater. 1996 Mar;12(2):88-95. PMid:9002849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80074-1.

Han L, Edward C, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. A comparative study of fluoride-releasing adhesive resin materials. Dent Mater J. 2002 Mar;21(1):9-19. PMid:12046524. http://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.21.9.

Tiwari S, Nandlal B. Effect of nano- filled surface coating agent on fluoride release from conventional glass ionomer cement: an in vitro trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2013 Apr-Jun;31(2):91-5. PMid:23886719. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.115703.

Ozdemir-Ozenen D, Sungurtekin E, Issever H, Sandalli N. Surface roughness of fluoride-releasing restorative materials after topical fluoride application. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Mar;14(1):68-72. PMid:23597225.

Bala O, Arisu HD, Yikilgan I, Arslan S, Gullu A. Evaluation of surface roughness and hardness of different glass ionomer cements. Eur J Dent. 2012 Jan;6(1):79-86. PMid:22229011.

Bollenl CML, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness of bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997 Jul;13(4):258-69. PMid:11696906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3.

Hadley PC, Billington RW, Pearson GJ, Williams JA. Effect of monovalente ions in glass ionomer cements on their interaction with sodium fluoride solution. Biomaterials. 2000 Jan;21(1):97-102. PMid:10619683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00149-0.

De Witte AM, De Maeyer EA, Verbeeck RM. Surface roughening of glass ionomer cements by neutral NaF solutions. Biomaterials. 2003 May;24(11):1995-2000. PMid:12615490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00617-8.
 

5a96e1400e882521361db5c0 rou Articles
Links & Downloads
1807-2577 (Electronic)
Rev. odontol. UNESP ©2024 All rights reserved.

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Share this page
Page Sections