Efeito de diferentes soluções utilizadas como irrigante final na superfície dentinária: análise de rugosidade
Effect of different solutions used as final irrigant on dentin surface: roughness analysis
Prado, Maíra do; Assis, Danielle Ferreira de; Simão, Renata Antoun
Resumo
Introdução: O uso de irrigantes pode gerar alterações microestruturais na superfície dentinária, entre as quais alterações na rugosidade. Essas alterações podem influenciar o processo de união dos materiais obturadores à dentina. Objetivo: O objetivo do presente trabalho foi avaliar o efeito das soluções de EDTA, hipoclorito de sódio (NaOCl) e clorexidina, como irrigante final, na rugosidade da superfície dentinária. Material e método: Foram utilizadas raízes distais de seis terceiros molares inferiores, que foram planificadas com o auxílio de disco de lixa e cortadas em segmentos, totalizando 18 amostras. A análise inicial foi realizada utilizando-se o perfilômetro Dektak. Foram realizadas cinco varreduras por amostra. Em seguida, as amostras foram irrigadas com NaOCl para simular o preparo químico-mecânico e lavadas com água destilada. Foram então divididas em seis grupos de acordo com o protocolo de irrigação final: Água destilada; NaOCl 5,25%; clorexidina 2%; EDTA17%; EDTA 17% + NaOCl 5,25%, e EDTA 17% + clorexidina 2%. Novamente, em cada amostra, foram realizadas cinco varreduras, totalizando 15 varreduras por grupo. Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente pelos testes de Kruskal-Wallis e Mann‑Whitney (p<0,05). Resultado: Foi encontrada alteração significativa da rugosidade somente no grupo em que houve a combinação do agente quelante com o NaOCl. Conclusão: Os protocolos de irrigação final apresentam diferentes efeitos na rugosidade da superfície dentinária.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Introduction: The use of irrigators can create microstructural changes in the dentin surface, including changes in roughness. These changes may influence the bonding process of filling materials to dentin. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of EDTA, sodium hypochlorite or chlorhexidine, as final irrigant, in the roughness of the dentin surface. Material and method: Distal root of 6 mandibular molars were used. The roots were flatted with the aid of sandpaper and segmented, totaling 18 samples. The initial analysis was performed by using Dektak profilometer. Five areas were scanned per sample. Then, the samples were irrigated with NaOCl to simulate the chemomechanical preparation and washed with distilled water. The segments were divided into six groups according to the final flush protocol: Distilled water, 5.25% NaOCl, 2% chlorhexidine, 17% EDTA, 17% EDTA+ 5.25% NaOCl, 17% EDTA+ 2% chlorhexidine. Once again, in each sample, five areas were scanned, totaling 15 scans per group. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal - Wallis and Mann -Whitney tests (p<0.05). Result: Significant changes in roughness were found only in the association of the chelating agent with NaOCl. Conclusion: The final irrigation protocols have different effects on surface roughness of dentin.
Keywords
References
1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am. 1974;18(2): 269-96.
2. Lopes HP, Siqueira Jr JF. Endodontia. Biologia e técnica. Rio de Janeiro: MEDSI; 2004.
3. Cohen S, Burns RC. Caminhos da polpa. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2000.
4. Jungbluth H, Marending M, De-Deus G, Sener B, Zehnder M. Stabilizing sodium hypochlorite at high pH: effects on soft tissue and dentin. J Endod. 2011;37(5):693–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.019
5. Moreira DM, Almeida JFA, Ferraz CCR, Gomes BP, Line SR, Zaia AA. Structural Analysis of bovine root dentin after use of different endodontics auxiliary chemical substances. J Endod. 2009;35(7):1023–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.002
6. Prado M, Simão RA, Gomes BP. Effect of different irrigation protocols on resin sealer bond strength to dentin. J Endod. 2013;39(5):689-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.009
7. McComb D, Smith DC. A preliminary scanning electron microscopic study of root canals after endodontic procedures. J Endod. 1975;1(7):238-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80226-3
8. Torabinejad M, Handysides R, Khademi AA, Bakland LK. Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94(6):658–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.128962
9. Clark-Holke D, Drake D, Walton R, Rivera E, Guthmiller JM. Bacterial penetration through canals of endodontically treated teeth in the presence or absence of the smear layer. J Dent. 2003;31(4):275-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00032-0
10. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod. 2006;32(5):389–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.014
11. Prado M, Gusman H, Gomes BP, Simão RA. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the effectiveness of phosphoric acid in smear layer removal when compared with EDTA and citric acid. J Endod. 2011;37(2):255–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.011
12. Ferraz CC, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro assessment of the antimicrobial action and the mechanical ability of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant. J Endod. 2001;27(7):452–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200107000-00004
13. Prado M, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Almeida JF, Gomes BP. Effectiveness of 2% chlorhexidine as a final flush on root canal filling: a coronal microleakage study. J Endod. 2012; 38:e55.
14. de Assis DF, Prado M, Simão RA. Evaluation of the interaction between endodontic sealers and dentin treated with different irrigant solutions. J Endod. 2011; 37(11):1550–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.014
15. Farina AP, Cecchin D, Barbizam JV, Carlini-Júnior B. Influence of endodontic irrigants on bond strength of a self-etching adhesive. Aust Endod J. 2011;37(1):26-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00249.x
16. Coli P, Alaeddin S, Wennerberg A, Karlsson S. In vitro dentin pretreatment: surface roughness and adhesive shear bond strength. Eur J Oral Sci. 1999; 107: 400-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos107512.x
17. Wenzel RN. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem. 1936;28:988–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie50320a024
18. Rosales JI, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Watanabe LG, Toledano M, Cabrerizo MA, et al. Acid-etching and hydration influence on dentin roughness and wettability. J Dent Res. 1999;78(9):1554-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780091001
19. Armengol V, Laboux O, Weiss P, Jean A, Hamel H. Effects of Er:YAG and Nd:YAP laser irradiation on the surface roughness and free surface energy of enamel and dentin: an in vitro study. Oper Dent. 2003;28(1):67-74.
20. Pringle JH, Fletcher M. Influence of substratum wettability on attachment of freshwater bacteria to solid surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983;45:811–7.
21. Hu X, Ling J, Gao Y. Effects of irrigation solutions on dentin wettability and roughness. J Endod. 2010;36(6):1064-7. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.007
22. Ari H, Erdemir A, Belli S. Evaluation of the effect of endodontic irrigation solutions on the microhardness and the roughness of root canal dentin. J Endod. 2004;30(11):792-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000128747.89857.59
23. Eldeniz AU, Erdemir A, Belli S. Effect of EDTA and citric acid solutions on the microhardness and the roughness of human root canal dentin. J Endod. 2005;31(2):107-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000136212.53475.ad
24. Yilmaz Z, Basbag B, Buzoglu HD, Gümüsderelioglu M. Effect of low-surface-tension EDTA solutions on the wettability of root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111(1):109-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.08.008
25. de Assis DF, do Prado M, Simão RA. Effect of disinfection solutions on the adhesion force of root canal filling materials. J Endod. 2012;38(6):853-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.01.002
26. Prado M, de Assis DF, Gomes BP, Simão RA. Effect of disinfectant solutions on the surface free energy and wettability of filling material. J Endod. 2011;37(7):980-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.03.021
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email